Ok, this is odd, I'm surprised I'm in the minority here.
Someone comes in, holds someone hostage, or what have you, then someone else comes in and shoots the man with the illegal gun, having saved the say, he's now charged with carrying a firearm illegally? That's just plain stupid. There's no evidence to suggest the man with the gun would've had or if he did, use the gun without the instigator causing the problem, by him having the gun he potentially saved lives, let him go, he did nothing wrong.
Someone comes in, holds someone hostage, or what have you, then someone else comes in and shoots the man with the illegal gun, having saved the say, he's now charged with carrying a firearm illegally? That's just plain stupid. There's no evidence to suggest the man with the gun would've had or if he did, use the gun without the instigator causing the problem, by him having the gun he potentially saved lives, let him go, he did nothing wrong.