War costs money, time, and huge amounts of resources. You'd have to be nuking entire countries.Charli said:Human controlled? No. Thats War.
War costs money, time, and huge amounts of resources. You'd have to be nuking entire countries.Charli said:Human controlled? No. Thats War.
I'm pretty sure plenty of people get flu vaccinations.CuddlyCombine said:Ah. Remember, you'd have to distribute your fertility killer. How do you imagine you can force vaccinations on hundreds of thousands of people?Glerken said:Eh, putting something in a flu vaccine that makes you sterile.
Sounds like an easy way to cut off on the worlds population.
you could try that but it wouldnt fool the religious crazies, they already stopped us from eliminating one disease (a topic Im too lazy too look up at the moment) by telling people it would sterilize themCuddlyCombine said:Ah. Remember, you'd have to distribute your fertility killer. How do you imagine you can force vaccinations on hundreds of thousands of people?Glerken said:Eh, putting something in a flu vaccine that makes you sterile.
Sounds like an easy way to cut off on the worlds population.
A couple million at the most, I'd imagine. It would be interesting to find numbers for that.Glerken said:I'm pretty sure plenty of people get flu vaccinations.
*Bang* Oooh too bad, missed my point entirely. Try again.CuddlyCombine said:War costs money, time, and huge amounts of resources. You'd have to be nuking entire countries.Charli said:Human controlled? No. Thats War.
In that case, no, I don't see war as population control at all. People may die in it, but not even anywhere close to making a dent in the overall number. War has never been fought to control population, and it's never had that effect. If I'm missing your point again that's because I have no idea what it is (or I assume this is it).Charli said:I didn't say people go to war whenever they feel like it I meant it was a human controlled aspect of population control and guess what mass amounts of people die in wars. Does it solve the problem in it's enitrety? PSH hell no, but it's as OPPOSED to the Nature version of control which is disease, genetic disfunctions. etc.
OP, it sounds like you want this to happen by the way you defend the existence of overpopulation as a real threat to the human race at every turn. Overpopulation is only an issue when the government does not properly take advantage of land. With the proper planning you could fit the population of China or India in a much smaller area.CuddlyCombine said:We're way past the carrying capacity of the earth. Give us a hundred years and we'll be screwed.matnatz said:There's no real need for population control.
I said this something like 4 years ago, but yeah, I certainly think it's a possibility.CuddlyCombine said:What if the government instilled this plan as an effort to cut down population? As I said, the people affected most are the uneducated.
Answer truthfully, do you want to live in an area where your home is stacked upon another home? An entire country that's built like a hive?matnatz said:OP, it sounds like you want this to happen by the way you defend the existence of overpopulation as a real threat to the human race at every turn. Overpopulation is only an issue when the government does not properly take advantage of land. With the proper planning you could fit the population of China or India in a much smaller area.
Currently I live in a small terraced house along a main road, it's pretty much an apartment complex but on it's side. So I doubt I'd see much difference. Anyway, building up isn't even a large step from building out, except more stairs and less traffic noise. And that's only if it's really bad. What about tall (Three floors), but narrow houses for families. Every inch you save on one building get's multiplied by however many buildings of that type their are in your town. But that's talking about the western world, where overpopulation is not a problem and will not be a problem.I III II X4 said:Answer truthfully, do you want to live in an area where your home is stacked upon another home? An entire country that's built like a hive?matnatz said:OP, it sounds like you want this to happen by the way you defend the existence of overpopulation as a real threat to the human race at every turn. Overpopulation is only an issue when the government does not properly take advantage of land. With the proper planning you could fit the population of China or India in a much smaller area.
It culls the culturally ignorant: Africans that don't like being told by foreigner whites how to have safe sex. Everywhere else, too, but I just finished watching an AIDS documentary focused on Africa =p.CuddlyCombine said:What you're about to read (if you have the attention span) is a viewpoint that I do not share. I mean, I thought of it, but I don't believe it; while not impossible, it is highly improbable, and I'm just trying to stir discussion. Poll included if you don't have time to spit out some words.
First, let's look at it; AIDS is a deviously evil disease. Symptoms don't appear for years after you get infected, leaving you to have sexual relations with anyone who doesn't suspect you of having AIDS and doesn't ask you to get tested. It takes a long time to become lethal, but once it is, nothing short of a complete bone marrow transplant can save you. In the end, you die. If you have children, they'll die. Whoever you've had sexual contact with will die.
Now, in the developed world, AIDS isn't as prevalent among the general populace, given increased awareness, condom usage, and preventive measures taken. However, in third-world countries, where rape and unsafe sex are as common as air molecules, it spreads like wildfire. Given the high birth rate in said countries, entire generations are being born only to die.
What if the government instilled this plan as an effort to cut down population? As I said, the people affected most are the uneducated, 'useless' ones in Africa and other impoverished locales. The rich upper class are much less likely to get the virus, which is perfect, considering they are the ruling caste. This way, the leadership of the world continues to live on, while the poor eventually all die out.
Sounds ridiculous, dun' it? Whatever, let's just talk possibilities and what the implications would be. Oh, and yes, I know that AIDS originated from chimps.