As I said, it wasn't a bad movie, it just went into a direction and turned the Alien into something I didn't quite care for.Teoes said:Fair enough your opinion and all, but I think you've missed the point of Aliens by a long shot. This is the same reason Alien games have missed the mark - because they're treating the alien as a cannon fodder space bug. Aliens doesn't do this at all - it's a Vietnam war movie in space (and other things, like motherhood, as well). In Aliens you've got your "bad-ass" marines, full of machismo and confidence in their technological edge and overwhelming firepower.. and they get completely taken apart by a largely unseen, technologically-inferior foe that the marines were totally unprepared for.Casual Shinji said:Aliens turned the Alien into a space bug whose only purpose was cannon fodder. None of the eerie mystique of the original creature, the Derelict, or the Space Jockey was left.
Not saying Aliens was a bad movie (except for the extended edition, that one sucked), but it really isn't for me.
Granted, Aliens does focus less on the mystique of the creature, the derelict spaceship, the Space Jockey, etc. (although it does instead bring in plenty of a different kind of lore, expanding the humans' side of the universe with so many iconic ideas.) as you say - but I disagree that the creature was there simply as cannon fodder. If anything the marines were the cannon fodder.
It was also loaded with little annoyances; I hated Newt. Burke being the standard corperate asshole even in the face of certain doom. Ripley suddenly having some long lost daughter syndrome. Given that one was only added in the later version, but everyone basically counts it as cannon now. And I fucking hate it.
Both the Alien and Aliens director's cut/extended edition just butcher both movies.