aint no problem with that dude, u don't have to be straight to be romantic, but i think you already know that.lSHaDoW-FoXl said:Gay. Just came out year ago. By far? Hopeless =(.
Not really... that's me in a nutshell too. I'm just too damned shy to do much about it.Indigo_Dingo said:What I care about is being the everything for someone, and knowing that they can mean everything to me. I want to listen to her problems, and just hold her til she feels better. God I'm alone....
maybe i can't give u a reason why u should but maybe ill just run this by youdalek sec said:I've given up on trying my luck at dating in general because to me the rewards don't even come close to risk's one has to take now a days. You might be able for a few days but in time like most things it'll go bad and turn to dust with enough time. The one main thing that drives me insane is that none of my friends or people I talk online with have been able to give me a real reason as to why I shouldn't give up about this stuff and why is it so important that I try it out or why I shouldn't just pack it up and become a shut in.
Pratchett, once again, chooses just the right words.Lord Krunk said:I'm a romantic!
To quote Rincewind; "Just because I'm bad at it doesn't change the fact that I am one"..
No, my double standard analogy does not make me a worthier human being. But frankly, no, smiling at me just because I was polite is not equal, especially considering that you are already expected to smile and as I'm holding the door for you, I am smiling myself. What, you think I'm going to hold the door for you and scowl as your walk past?JMeganSnow said:So not cussing and opening the occasional door consists of "going out of your way" and somehow makes you a worthier human being, but a woman taking time out of *her* day to express appreciation *doesn't*? Do you see the double standard THERE?ninjablu said:So let me get this straight. You think that I should, on a usual basis, hold the door open for you and be sensitive to the fact that you are a woman when talking to you in the office, and that you think I should go out of my way to treat you better (like, say, not cussing with) than just a guy I share a cubicle with, but then when it comes promotion time you and I should be equal, although the only thing you've done to reciprocate me going out of my way is a smile here and there.
Do you see the double standard yet?
And I am so confused by your second paragraph. When did personal economics become a job as a firefighter?
Idiot. No wonder you're having such a tough time comprehending my firefighter analogy. One of the areas where women of the feminist type complain most stringently about "discrimination" against women is in tough physical jobs where most women just aren't up to the work. (The women who CAN do the work generally aren't interested in it.) So instead of accepting that there are always going to be a lot more male firefighters, they demand that women be held to lower standards than men in hiring practices until "parity" is achieved.
How this is going to help someone trapped inside a burning building I do not know, but a woman will Have A Job and apparently that's all that matters to feminists. Since most personal economics consist of having a job, the analogy is pretty damn apt.
ninja im gunna have to disagree with you there, it just takes the right type of woman (physically i mean), its like how some men can't play football. I have seen women do some amazing things before, that perhaps a man couldn't do. For example the woman who picked up a car to save her child, i think we have all heard of that one, so im not gunna bother digging around the internet looking for proof.ninjablu said:No, my double standard analogy does not make me a worthier human being. But frankly, no, smiling at me just because I was polite is not equal, especially considering that you are already expected to smile and as I'm holding the door for you, I am smiling myself. What, you think I'm going to hold the door for you and scowl as your walk past?JMeganSnow said:So not cussing and opening the occasional door consists of "going out of your way" and somehow makes you a worthier human being, but a woman taking time out of *her* day to express appreciation *doesn't*? Do you see the double standard THERE?ninjablu said:So let me get this straight. You think that I should, on a usual basis, hold the door open for you and be sensitive to the fact that you are a woman when talking to you in the office, and that you think I should go out of my way to treat you better (like, say, not cussing with) than just a guy I share a cubicle with, but then when it comes promotion time you and I should be equal, although the only thing you've done to reciprocate me going out of my way is a smile here and there.
Do you see the double standard yet?
And I am so confused by your second paragraph. When did personal economics become a job as a firefighter?
Idiot. No wonder you're having such a tough time comprehending my firefighter analogy. One of the areas where women of the feminist type complain most stringently about "discrimination" against women is in tough physical jobs where most women just aren't up to the work. (The women who CAN do the work generally aren't interested in it.) So instead of accepting that there are always going to be a lot more male firefighters, they demand that women be held to lower standards than men in hiring practices until "parity" is achieved.
How this is going to help someone trapped inside a burning building I do not know, but a woman will Have A Job and apparently that's all that matters to feminists. Since most personal economics consist of having a job, the analogy is pretty damn apt.
Let me try this with out incurring a flame war, since that's what I'm trying to not do.
If I, as a human being, make space for another, different type of human being, on a regular basis, but it is not expected that this other human being do anything notable to make space for myself as a human being, but then this other human being also expects that when the time comes, they will be held on the same pane as myself, even though I am put under more constraints as to what I should do than this other human being is. They expect that the only manner by which they are judged is by work, and certainly if they work harder for it then they deserve the promotion/pay raise/whatever, but if we are equal in our outputs, and I am the one going out and doing extra to accommodate other human beings while not being compensated by any sort of politeness nor expecting any compensation in return, then no, I don't feel like there is an equality there.
If one worker has a partner who is mentally disabled, and the worker has to constantly aid the second one in movement although the second person is good at his job, then the first one is doing more and should be regarded in a more favorable light.
If one worker is consistently polite to the other worker, follows an explicit set of rules that the other one is not really bound by, and they both do well at their job, then they can not be judged on the same level because they do not operate on the same level.
Does that make a little more sense?
Does it show the double standard or expecting, and then expecting again rather than giving?
Certainly some males do this too, but I'm going to guess these are the minority.
And as far as your Fireman's analogy goes, I agree with you. It's the same reason women are kept out of combat infantry in the armies. They just can't push themselves as far or as fast as men can. I'd almost argue that women should be kept to more desk-type jobs in police departments too, except I know one and I'm fairly certain she could kick my ass from here to Helsinki and not break a sweat.
Okay, I'll agree that there are SOME women who can actually do things men can't do. In general, and by that I mean 99.9999% of all women out there, average women are not able to do the things average men can do, and average firefighters are stronger and more built than average men. Some on the whole, women can not physically do the things soldiers have to do on a regular basis either. Hell, most men can't either. You ever taken a 26 mile forced march?jockslap said:ninja im gunna have to disagree with you there, it just takes the right type of woman (physically i mean), its like how some men can't play football. I have seen women do some amazing things before, that perhaps a man couldn't do. For example the woman who picked up a car to save her child, i think we have all heard of that one, so im not gunna bother digging around the internet looking for proof.
Oh, I see, you took smiling as an attempt to reward a guy for opening a door. That's not what I meant. Women should smile at men or give them *some* special treatment/acknowledgment on principle, just as men occasionally do nice things for women on principle, just because they're women. It's just how you occasionally treat your friends to an ice cream cone or whatever without sitting down and hashing out exactly how they're going to repay you--the general give and take of the relationship more or less balances out and it's a wash. That's how it ought to work.ninjablu said:No, my double standard analogy does not make me a worthier human being. But frankly, no, smiling at me just because I was polite is not equal, especially considering that you are already expected to smile and as I'm holding the door for you, I am smiling myself. What, you think I'm going to hold the door for you and scowl as your walk past?
Somewhat but it really doesn't answer my questions about it.jockslap said:maybe i can't give u a reason why u should but maybe ill just run this by youdalek sec said:I've given up on trying my luck at dating in general because to me the rewards don't even come close to risk's one has to take now a days. You might be able for a few days but in time like most things it'll go bad and turn to dust with enough time. The one main thing that drives me insane is that none of my friends or people I talk online with have been able to give me a real reason as to why I shouldn't give up about this stuff and why is it so important that I try it out or why I shouldn't just pack it up and become a shut in.
perhaps love doesn't have to last forever, maybe if it's something that no matter how short u still wouldn't trade away that time for anything else in the world?
(i know the wording in there sucked hard, but i think i got my point across)
Okay, I'll buy that. I'll buy that later in life (considering I'm on the young side) that it will work that way, and having interned in a corporation it was more as you described it than I am.JMeganSnow said:Oh, I see, you took smiling as an attempt to reward a guy for opening a door. That's not what I meant. Women should smile at men or give them *some* special treatment/acknowledgment on principle, just as men occasionally do nice things for women on principle, just because they're women. It's just how you occasionally treat your friends to an ice cream cone or whatever without sitting down and hashing out exactly how they're going to repay you--the general give and take of the relationship more or less balances out and it's a wash. That's how it ought to work.ninjablu said:No, my double standard analogy does not make me a worthier human being. But frankly, no, smiling at me just because I was polite is not equal, especially considering that you are already expected to smile and as I'm holding the door for you, I am smiling myself. What, you think I'm going to hold the door for you and scowl as your walk past?
Men generally aren't aware of just how many concessions women give them because they don't often see how women act when there are no men around. From what I've seen, women are *slightly* more conscious of what men do, but only slightly. I'm usually not, I'm the type of girl who pulls out a chair and sits in it even if the waiter in the restaurant has already pulled one out for me--not because I refuse to be "treated", but because I didn't want to sit in that chair and I didn't notice what he was doing. My housemate LAUGHED at me for that one.
AS far as being a shut in goes, being grounded to her house for a summer with nothing to do, and no ability to contact the outside, is what caused my ex to almost commit suicide. I'm not saying you'll commit suicide if you become a shut in, but you do realize there will be a psychological effect from the loneliness, correct?dalek sec said:Somewhat but it really doesn't answer my questions about it.jockslap said:maybe i can't give u a reason why u should but maybe ill just run this by youdalek sec said:I've given up on trying my luck at dating in general because to me the rewards don't even come close to risk's one has to take now a days. You might be able for a few days but in time like most things it'll go bad and turn to dust with enough time. The one main thing that drives me insane is that none of my friends or people I talk online with have been able to give me a real reason as to why I shouldn't give up about this stuff and why is it so important that I try it out or why I shouldn't just pack it up and become a shut in.
perhaps love doesn't have to last forever, maybe if it's something that no matter how short u still wouldn't trade away that time for anything else in the world?
(i know the wording in there sucked hard, but i think i got my point across)
Hyzenthlay said:Haha..My boyfriends one of the awkward guys. I think that example conversation is almost an exact replica of our first conversation. If you get to know someone well it stops being a social situation and you don't need to think about what you say as you dont need to impress them...I used to be that awkward to.