Picture the stereotypical racist, the hypothetical George Studdard of rural Georgia: white, 51 years-old, high-school educated, lower middle-class. George was born into a racist household, raised by racist parents, and grew up in a predominantly racist community. The word "n****r" was said casually around his house. Growing up, George rarely saw minorities except on TV. His neighbors talk disparagingly about the migrant "s***s" who pick vegetables on nearby farms. His classmates, and later co-workers, make jokes about blacks, Muslims, and Jews on a regular basis. More than half of the religious leaders and authority figures in his town are widely known to hold prejudiced personal beliefs.
So is it really a surprise that George became a racist? Is he not simply a product of his environment? Isn't he really a victim of a primitive, prejudiced upbringing that he could not control? Sure, people can later realize the error of their ways, but one's formative years can be the most critical in forming political, social, and religious opinions. Few people make radical changes in their values and beliefs later in life.
Even if this doesn't justify his behavior and speech, is not George as much a victim as those he hates?
Btw, these aren't necessarily my personal views, but I think this is an interesting topic of discussion.
So is it really a surprise that George became a racist? Is he not simply a product of his environment? Isn't he really a victim of a primitive, prejudiced upbringing that he could not control? Sure, people can later realize the error of their ways, but one's formative years can be the most critical in forming political, social, and religious opinions. Few people make radical changes in their values and beliefs later in life.
Even if this doesn't justify his behavior and speech, is not George as much a victim as those he hates?
Btw, these aren't necessarily my personal views, but I think this is an interesting topic of discussion.