I was a bit harsh sorry, just comparing it to AA or calling it perfect seems ridiculous to me300lb. Samoan said:Don't spoiler tag it. If you don't have the sack to insult me without concealing how immature you are, then you have no business saying anything at all.AndyFromMonday said:Don't open the spoiler tag below if you don't enjoy being insulted.
I'm a retard, disregard my opinion.
I wouldn't call it mediocre, I had a great time with it and it has at least two aspects that are better than Arkham Asylum: the writing doesn't rely on comic book cliches, and it's rendered much cleaner. All the highlights shining off of Batman's gloves and everyone's faces are pretty ugly. But AA does control much better and has a universal appeal - everybody loves Batman.Zing said:I hope you mean ACII. The first Assassin's Creed is a very mediocre game. AA is much better.
At the end of the day, though, AC is my idea of a perfect game design. Plenty to explore, beautiful vistas and a very engaging story. Just beat it 15 minutes ago, looking forward to playing the sequel now. Not counting on ever understanding that weak ending though...
Graphics wise it's a very pretty game for 2007(a bit dated now), but the gameplay ruined it a bit, it's so repetitive and it has too many flaws to be considered perfect. But hey, if you hold AC in that high of a regard you will consider ACII absolutely amazing. So enjoy that!