I'm not allowed in the UK currently because of travel and autoimmune issues. I f I could I would a number of my friends do, but they say its a bit of a ***** to organise the appointment to donate the blood, NHS magic 
I would, but I can't do it again until January or February because I gave back in September. As soon as they send me a text asking me, I shall make an appointment.marcooos said:So any chance I can convince anyone on here to go blood doning soon? Regardless of country donor levels are pretty low at the moment and it's becoming a pretty bad issue.
You do know you can go on the internet and look up where blood donations are taking place near you.Mistermixmaster said:Never have donated blood, probably never will. Not like A+ is hard to come by anyway. I guess it's partially because I dunno where I'd go to donate blood in my area.
Now now don't get unnecessarily hateful here. The chance of acquiring AIDS from male-to-male intercourse is several orders of magnitude higher than for any other demographic (if I remember correctly, around 46 times higher). Now this wouldn't be a problem with blood testing except for the fact that there is a 2 months period (after infection) in which HIV cannot be detected. So there is a reason why it tends to be rejected (though the life ban is silly, should be around 12 to 18 months to guarantee no approximate infection).The Almighty Grigard said:Nah, It's not the "gay blood" that is the problem. It is the "risk of infection". They blatantly disregard safety precautions, roles of either partner and what you actually did. But they do issue a blanket statement. "If you are male and have had a sexual encounter with another male you are not allowed to donate blood." Just like that. Nevermind that they test every single bag of donated blood with nearly perfect accuracy. Sure, let some poor 0negative bastard bleed out because of a 0,00001% chance. Makes sense!Bhaalspawn said:I bet they're afraid that "gay blood" will "infect" patients and turn them gay. Which kinda makes me laugh just a little bit...thaluikhain said:Yeah, we have that in Australia as well, or rather a 12 month ban after having male/male sex, because anal sex increases risk of infection for the person whose anus it is. Nothing about male/female anal sex, of course, nor what role the person played in male/male sex.The Almighty Grigard said:Huh I have a tragic little story about this little thing. See I am blood type 0 Rh negative. Which basically means I could give more or less anyone. I have no blood carried diseases or anything as well. I have never even tried drugs or tobacco, so I haven't ever been at risk of an infected needle. I could go on forever detailing the very good reasons why our hospitals would love to get their hands on my blood. I want to donate blood to help people.
But there's one problem. Because of one tiny tiny thing they absolutely refuse to even draw and test my blood, no discussion or argument, just fuck right off and never come back. Because I am male attracted to other males.
I'm not shitting you.
OT: I donate blood whenever I'm permitted to. The minimum time has been changing frequently over the last couple of years. And being AB-, they never seem to have much of it.
You have to fill out a form. If I would lie then I would be breaking the law. (breaking the law)Zhukov said:Wait... did they actually ask if you were gay during testing or something?The Almighty Grigard said:snip
If you were really eager to donate, couldn't you just go to a clinic where they don't know you?
...
OT: I should and I probably would. However I won't because I will have completely forgotten about it within half an hour of making this post.
Come to think of it, I don't even know my blood type.
I'm not really interested in doing that.
I haven't actually gone and gotten checked by them but I read the quick guide on their website that gives you rough advice on when it's time to go an donate. On the page about sexlife it says in plain text. "[If you] Are male and have [ever] had sexual contact with another man. You can not donate blood." Plain and simple. I've also read in the local newspaper of perfectly healty would be donors not even being allowed to fill out the form, because their same sex boyfriend came with them and they casually mentioned that they were in a relationship.
http://geblod.nu/bli-blodgivare/kan-du-ge-blod/
Google translate is your friend.
Edit:
I just found something even more hilariously outdated borderline racist.
Stämmer detta på dig?
Då är chansen stor att du kan bli blodgivare.
* Är 18-60 år (18-60 years old)
* Är frisk (are healty)
* Väger minst 50 kilo (weighs at least 50 kilos]
* Har giltig ID-handling (have a valid ID)
* Förstår och talar svenska (understand and speak swedish)
* Har svenskt personnummer
The fuck? So if a perfectly healthy newly moved in German, that has been made a proper Swedish citizen, wants to donate blood, he is not allowed because he hasn't learned Swedish yet? What kind of bullshit is that?
This is a very common misconception about giving blood. Everyone seems to think that 0- is the best kind because you can give to everyone and that AB+ are lucky bastards who can get from anyone. The truth is that the most common blood types (A+ and O+)n are the ones that are most desired by the blood banks because they are more common. When a blood type is common it means that more people need that.Mistermixmaster said:Never have donated blood, probably never will. Not like A+ is hard to come by anyway. I guess it's partially because I dunno where I'd go to donate blood in my area.
It's not the male/male sex. It's the unprotected anal sex with the hilariously dangerous levels of blood contact. If they changed their policy to "wait 18 months after anal sex" I would be perfectly happy with that. Or even "Wait X months after male/male anal sex" I would have been satisfied. Their policy strictly states ANY sexual contact EVER between men means prohibited for LIFE. No mention of what you actually DID with your partner or how long ago it was. There are some really specific examples regarding straight sex like "You had sex with a person that has been at risk of infection for blood borne diseases and there was a risk that you had blood contact with that person... Wait 12 months." "Touched a mans penis? GET THE FUCK OUT HOMO!"icaritos said:Now now don't get unnecessarily hateful here. The chance of acquiring AIDS from male-to-male intercourse is several orders of magnitude higher than for any other demographic (if I remember correctly, around 46 times higher). Now this wouldn't be a problem with blood testing except for the fact that there is a 2 months period (after infection) in which HIV cannot be detected. So there is a reason why it tends to be rejected (though the life ban is silly, should be around 12 to 18 months to guarantee no approximate infection).The Almighty Grigard said:Nah, It's not the "gay blood" that is the problem. It is the "risk of infection". They blatantly disregard safety precautions, roles of either partner and what you actually did. But they do issue a blanket statement. "If you are male and have had a sexual encounter with another male you are not allowed to donate blood." Just like that. Nevermind that they test every single bag of donated blood with nearly perfect accuracy. Sure, let some poor 0negative bastard bleed out because of a 0,00001% chance. Makes sense!Bhaalspawn said:I bet they're afraid that "gay blood" will "infect" patients and turn them gay. Which kinda makes me laugh just a little bit...thaluikhain said:Yeah, we have that in Australia as well, or rather a 12 month ban after having male/male sex, because anal sex increases risk of infection for the person whose anus it is. Nothing about male/female anal sex, of course, nor what role the person played in male/male sex.The Almighty Grigard said:Huh I have a tragic little story about this little thing. See I am blood type 0 Rh negative. Which basically means I could give more or less anyone. I have no blood carried diseases or anything as well. I have never even tried drugs or tobacco, so I haven't ever been at risk of an infected needle. I could go on forever detailing the very good reasons why our hospitals would love to get their hands on my blood. I want to donate blood to help people.
But there's one problem. Because of one tiny tiny thing they absolutely refuse to even draw and test my blood, no discussion or argument, just fuck right off and never come back. Because I am male attracted to other males.
I'm not shitting you.
OT: I donate blood whenever I'm permitted to. The minimum time has been changing frequently over the last couple of years. And being AB-, they never seem to have much of it.
You have to fill out a form. If I would lie then I would be breaking the law. (breaking the law)Zhukov said:Wait... did they actually ask if you were gay during testing or something?The Almighty Grigard said:snip
If you were really eager to donate, couldn't you just go to a clinic where they don't know you?
...
OT: I should and I probably would. However I won't because I will have completely forgotten about it within half an hour of making this post.
Come to think of it, I don't even know my blood type.
I'm not really interested in doing that.
I haven't actually gone and gotten checked by them but I read the quick guide on their website that gives you rough advice on when it's time to go an donate. On the page about sexlife it says in plain text. "[If you] Are male and have [ever] had sexual contact with another man. You can not donate blood." Plain and simple. I've also read in the local newspaper of perfectly healty would be donors not even being allowed to fill out the form, because their same sex boyfriend came with them and they casually mentioned that they were in a relationship.
http://geblod.nu/bli-blodgivare/kan-du-ge-blod/
Google translate is your friend.
Edit:
I just found something even more hilariously outdated borderline racist.
Stämmer detta på dig?
Då är chansen stor att du kan bli blodgivare.
* Är 18-60 år (18-60 years old)
* Är frisk (are healty)
* Väger minst 50 kilo (weighs at least 50 kilos]
* Har giltig ID-handling (have a valid ID)
* Förstår och talar svenska (understand and speak swedish)
* Har svenskt personnummer
The fuck? So if a perfectly healthy newly moved in German, that has been made a proper Swedish citizen, wants to donate blood, he is not allowed because he hasn't learned Swedish yet? What kind of bullshit is that?
Can't believe it took this long for someone to say this.Shocksplicer said:Doning isn't a real word dude...