Poll: Breastfeeding in public

Recommended Videos

WolfThomas

Man must have a code.
Dec 21, 2007
5,291
0
0
Well I personaly don't believe getting your breasts out in public should be a crime, even if not breastfeeding. Any situation where it's appropriate for a man to be topless, a woman should be able to be if she wants.

As for breast-feeding, I've got nothing wrong with that being done in public, it's an important part of child-raising and completely natural. That said I personally object to the minority of mothers who think it's acceptable to change a nappy/diaper in a public place, especially a restaurant. That's a health and safety issue, right there. Plus it's gross.
 

Johnnyallstar

New member
Feb 22, 2009
2,928
0
0
Amazing how something natural like that can be so reviled by people. It also amazes me how many people are so aghast at nudity. Of course, we are almost infantile about nudity anyways, because the vast majority of people anymore cannot appreciate nudity in art, but see it as only a means of perversion, not beauty.

I just wish people could be more mature about such things.
 

TheEldestScroll

New member
Feb 20, 2011
131
0
0
i'm for it. i mean why not?
its not like its a super common issue anyways.

but if i were a woman, i probably wouldn't want to expose my boobies in public, but thats just me. i've never been offended by boobies, so again, why not?
 

Rayne870

New member
Nov 28, 2010
1,250
0
0
it just bothers me because i dont know how to react to it. when we were more primitive and less prudish it wasnt a problem but now breasts are overly sexuallized and we dont know how to react to a woman pulling them out for a non sexual purpose.

if its someone a few tables away or something like that i can deal with it and just not look at it, i mean its not my business and staring at a woman without her boob out is awkward enough. i have had some experiences where it was extended family members during conversations and just pop out comes the boob up comes the baby and they keep talking like its nothing. i get it you're comfortable with breast feeding but i'm not really comfortable with it and i feel rude no matter what i do.

ive matured a lot lately with a lot of different perspectives on issues and this one still just sort of sits there smacking me in the back of the head.

tbh i think i just need to be told by the person how i should feel about it and i would probably be fine. and i guess im mostly scared about having a wandering eye or something.
 

Rayne870

New member
Nov 28, 2010
1,250
0
0
Marik2 said:
Well I dont know, Ive never seen a woman breastfeed in public so I cant really say if I would be against or for it.

You should put a I dont know option btw.

Edit: Ah heres a good vid on the subject
hey thanks for that video, it introduced me to a great series and i learned a lot about myself and, i think im a better person for having watched those experiments.
 

The Apothecarry

New member
Mar 6, 2011
1,051
0
0
While it's not exactly courteous to breastfeed in public, a crying child isn't pleasant to listen to either.

I suppose it depends on location. At a park, I could care less but if a woman is breastfeeding in a restaurant, I'll kindly look the other way but I won't deny feeling awkward about it.
 

iamthe1

New member
Mar 16, 2011
71
0
0
UUUUUUUUHHHHHHHHH............ get the fuck over it, dude.

Seriously? This is the most mind-fuckingly stupid thing I have ever read on this site. I think I just shat myself reading that.

How does this have 393 replies?
 

Womplord

New member
Feb 14, 2010
390
0
0
I don't see the big deal about breast feeding in public. You can't even see the nipple for a start, and it's perfectly natural (okay, I know a penis is perfectly natural, but it isn't necessary to pull it out and it's necessary to eat).
 

robincb

New member
Apr 23, 2008
54
0
0
Bakuryukun said:
also breastfeeding is shown to help the mother-child bonding process, if people have a problem with it, maybe THEY should leave. Also I don't really think breastfeeding counts as "public nudity" seeing as there's a large baby head in the way.
Yeah im going to wave my schlong around in your face, it has been proven to increase my masculinity, if someone has a problem with it maybe THEY should leave. i don't really think it counts as public nudity seeing as your face is in the way.


Carry on.
 

jack_hectic

New member
Dec 24, 2008
30
0
0
Galliam said:
I understand the desire to be free to feed your child, but I don't understand why Im such a terrible person for thinking that it should be a more private action.
i don't think you are such a terrible person. most people cannot tolerate those who disagree. it is a means of (re)enforcing their reality tunnel.

that being said, i think it is an awful pity that it happens around you so often that it affects your public dining experience, and an awful pity that you are unable to visually shrug it off.

DID YOU KNOW?
...that the human ear and audio processing centers of the brain are able to tune in and tune out audio? you are mentally able to mix the audio you are hearing. basically, if you don't like what you are hearing, and there is some other sound present, you can focus so completely on the second (less unpleasant) sound, that you become completely (consciously) unaware of that first, (more unpleasant) sound.

your ears and brain are set up to do this naturally! BUT you can also enhance this ability by training your mind.

you are essentially doing the same thing with your eyes when you stare at your food! maybe you can train your visual mind as well?
 

jack_hectic

New member
Dec 24, 2008
30
0
0
Caligulas.dog said:
Does anyone who's not an American actually give a damn about this topic? I am from Germany, have been to most countries in Europe, and I never ever found someone who was actually offended. But then again, on most of our beaches its allowed to take down your bra to sunbathe. Americans are strange.
i guess i am taking the European view on this "issue."

in public, i do look away from bare-breasts in general, simply for the courtesy; in this land, the "proud patriotic," "morally upstanding," "deeply faithful," and "tremendously thick" are still organized and (somehow) esteemed enough to have a voice in our government. so nudity is frowned upon, and if something like a gust of wind blows up a woman's skirt, it is also frowned upon to leer at them like they're a cheeseburger and you're a fatso (...yet if attractive young guys take off their shirts in public, i fully expect housewives and spinsters to blush, and start gossiping to close-by friends breathlessly, the stereotype goes). the whole attitude is generally of AVOIDANCE. "problems may arise with naked people around. so lets just nip them problems in the bud, mkay?"

if i remember correctly, in this country, the "7 deadly words you cannot say on television" were originally started because of an alabama PREACHER who wrote to his radio station to COMPLAIN because he did not like CERTAIN WORDS in the radio broadcast.

do take note, freedom of religion and freedom of speech were protected in the same amendment. maybe the infant government of this country perceived that attacks on speech would be made by religions, and decided to put them both in the same amendment so to attack one would shoot yourself in the foot.

did he own that radio station?

this is the whole point i am getting at. this preacher could have changed the station; took matters of what he was going to listen to on his radio into his own hands. but maybe im wrong! maybe every station was full of loud, profane, raunchy homosexual relations and jazz, and this guy had a long day of dealing with his parish' comparatively pale problems while he's wresting with things like "is it homophobia or latent homosexuality?" maybe it was raining out, and his candles got wet, so he could neither go for a walk nor read in silence. maybe his only choice for any kind of entertainment that evening besides silent meditation was the radio. and maybe that area had only one station, i bet radio was expensive back than.

but couldn't he just turn it off and go to bed early?

in any case im getting away from the issue and what i wanted to ask. i generally feel like most of american attitudes to sexuality and nudity are rather restrictive and sheltered. and yet, going to the beach i am still uncomfortable being naked around other people. for some reason its like theres less of their bodily fluids getting into the water as well when theyre clothed. and that nothing else in the ocean defecates and urinates and ejaculates in the water. theres lots of nonsensical beliefs like this in our stupid culture. so why couldnt i strip nude and hang out in water with a bunch of other nude primates?

that i dont know. wish i did. BUT, german fellow! question!

in your country, is it impolite to take a girl to the beach for a date? say you've only dated about a week, and you'd want to see her nude. or do you guys have that attitude to nudity? for that matter, whats your side of the world's attitude to pornography? would the girl just tell you to fuck off if you suggested a beach-date that early in the relationship? would she feel socially obligated to go since its only swimming, and not fucking?

i actually want to know the answers to this, if you feel you can provide them?
 

awesomeClaw

New member
Aug 17, 2009
1,831
0
0
Well, i agree with what others said.

If a women needs to feed her kid in public(If it´s private then she can whip out her boob as much as she likes), extract some milk into a bottle and do it like that.
If that´s not an option, do it somewhere private, like the bathroom or such. If that´s not an option, then fine, go ahead, do it in public, but try to be subtle and cover it up with a bit of cloth or the like.

Frankly, i´m offended by people who say "grow up". I´m personally not inconvenienced by a woman breastfeeding in public, like most swedes, i don´t give a fuck. But you know what? I´m inconvenienced and disgusted by insects and the like. Should i "grow up"? Should i "mature" and stop being annoyed? Because i can´t. So why should i expect anyone else to do so in another matter?
 

Rylingo

New member
Aug 13, 2008
397
0
0
Jumplion said:
27CDruid said:
Has anyone died of second-hand smoking? I would like to know, never heard of anyone dieing of second-hand lung cancer or whatever.
Yes. Do a quick search and you'll find plenty of statistics associated with second hand smoke related deaths.
Just saying, when you're in a discussion, you're the one who usually gives the evidence, the discussion-er shouldn't have to. Just saying, not trying to sound pompous or anything.

But anyway, I've looked up a few sites, anything ranging from "3,000 people a year" to "53,000 a year" to "none a year, it's all bullshit you were told in grade school". You're thinking of my example as if people would be in a secluded room with only the smoker/breast-feeder, when it would be more likely to occur at an open park or non-conspicuously in a smallish restaurant. Regardless of whether or not second-hand smoking kills, I hope my original point came across.. People should enjoy their freedoms, but shouldn't be allowed to infringe on other people's rights of being comfortable. Just common courtesy, I think.
The problem with smoking is that people in general jump to either extreme making up figures to support their point.

The best source I could find was the "Scientific Committee on Tobacco and Health" and they concluded that:
Exposure to second-hand smoke is a cause of lung cancer and, in those with long-term exposure, the increased risk is 20-30%.

I could do further searching if you really want, but honestly, id rather be lazy!
 

Jumplion

New member
Mar 10, 2008
7,873
0
0
27CDruid said:
Jumplion said:
27CDruid said:
Has anyone died of second-hand smoking? I would like to know, never heard of anyone dieing of second-hand lung cancer or whatever.
Yes. Do a quick search and you'll find plenty of statistics associated with second hand smoke related deaths.
Just saying, when you're in a discussion, you're the one who usually gives the evidence, the discussion-er shouldn't have to. Just saying, not trying to sound pompous or anything.

But anyway, I've looked up a few sites, anything ranging from "3,000 people a year" to "53,000 a year" to "none a year, it's all bullshit you were told in grade school". You're thinking of my example as if people would be in a secluded room with only the smoker/breast-feeder, when it would be more likely to occur at an open park or non-conspicuously in a smallish restaurant. Regardless of whether or not second-hand smoking kills, I hope my original point came across.. People should enjoy their freedoms, but shouldn't be allowed to infringe on other people's rights of being comfortable. Just common courtesy, I think.
The problem with smoking is that people in general jump to either extreme making up figures to support their point.

The best source I could find was the "Scientific Committee on Tobacco and Health" and they concluded that:
Exposure to second-hand smoke is a cause of lung cancer and, in those with long-term exposure, the increased risk is 20-30%.

I could do further searching if you really want, but honestly, id rather be lazy!
See, I wasn't talking about long-term exposure. You expose anyone to anything for a long time they're bound to get something from it. Unless you live in the world's smokiest city, I don't think it would matter much if the guy (or gal) lit one up next to you unless you politely ask them to snuff it out. Like I said, common courtesy.
 

the_green_dragon

New member
Nov 18, 2009
660
0
0
Spy_Guy said:
Breastfeeding is legal, nay, protected by the law. (in most places, for places that are not, different story)

Your comparing setting off smoke bombs, flashing and playing stupidiy loud music are silly.
For one, the activities you are talking about are, for the most part, illegal. Public nusiance I think they fall under....
 

Cyberwulf

New member
Sep 24, 2008
23
0
0
Dude. You have a neck. Turn it.

I do like the idea that expecting women to breastfeed in a germ-ridden toilet is perfectly reasonable, yet the reverse situation (changing a shitty nappy on a restaurant table) is greeted with disgust.

Of course what this is really about is the fact that there's a naked boob but it's Not For You, it's for Baby. And how dare there be tits that aren't there for men to ogle.
 

fenrizz

New member
Feb 7, 2009
2,788
0
0
Bakuryukun said:
If the baby is hungry then it's hungry. Everyone should just get over it imo. It's really not that bad, it's not like you see anything anyways, Babies have big heads you see.
Quoted for truth.

What is the big deal?
It's not like you can see anything anyway.
 

Cyberwulf

New member
Sep 24, 2008
23
0
0
Flare Phoenix said:
IceStar100 said:
I wonder to those who are fine with it. Is it ok for me to wolf call and hoot at her. If she does not care if she make other uncomfortable should I have to care about her wants.
Yeah I think that's the thing that gets to me. If you pull them out in public, you got to be prepared for some people (especially young boys) to be like "Wow! What the hell are those?!". It's kind of like the whole "just because I dress like a slut, doesn't make me a slut" argument some women use for how they dress.
TornadoADV said:
If they do it, I reserve the right to call my boys in and we can have a school circle pow-wow around her and watch intently. If she makes a fuss, it becomes indecent exposure and she goes to jail and we get a free show.
Yeah! Sexually harass those dumb bitches till they do what YOU want!

Are you serious?
 

Flare Phoenix

New member
Dec 18, 2009
418
0
0
Cyberwulf said:
Flare Phoenix said:
IceStar100 said:
I wonder to those who are fine with it. Is it ok for me to wolf call and hoot at her. If she does not care if she make other uncomfortable should I have to care about her wants.
Yeah I think that's the thing that gets to me. If you pull them out in public, you got to be prepared for some people (especially young boys) to be like "Wow! What the hell are those?!". It's kind of like the whole "just because I dress like a slut, doesn't make me a slut" argument some women use for how they dress.
TornadoADV said:
If they do it, I reserve the right to call my boys in and we can have a school circle pow-wow around her and watch intently. If she makes a fuss, it becomes indecent exposure and she goes to jail and we get a free show.
Yeah! Sexually harass those dumb bitches till they do what YOU want!

Are you serious?
Better than making bogus claims of sexual harrassment in order to cover for the fact you have absolutely no valuable input in the matter.