Poll: Brute Force or Lethal Efficiency?

Recommended Videos

Skorpyo

Average Person Extraordinaire!
May 2, 2010
2,284
0
0
Why not do both?


OT: Efficiency. Ever since the first FPS, efficient shooters have always won against spray-n'-pray-ers.
 

Diserasta

New member
Jul 13, 2009
38
0
0
Surgical Precision.
The ability to remove a man's finger from 700 yards just feels soooo good.
 

EternalFenix

New member
Sep 23, 2010
32
0
0
I try to be all-around lethal whenever I play games like that. A combination of long-range support, mid-range precision strikes, and close-quarters overwhelming might. So Im not sure what that makes me.
 

RatRace123

Elite Member
Dec 1, 2009
6,649
0
41
Efficiency, there is nothing cooler than dropping an unsuspecting guy with one shot.

Though I don't play COD or any shooters like that, I'm assuming this question can also be applied to life.
 

gigastar

Insert one-liner here.
Sep 13, 2010
4,418
0
0
Well NOT refering to any fps where bullet spam is the best all round tactic. Before i continue, Snipers lining up for that perfect one shot kill? you target just stepped back around that corner he came out of, and theres someone behind you with a shotgun and doesnt look too friendly.

Back to my point, this is more easily applied to RTS games where the brute force is a about 50 late game tanks or equivalent, and fine percison is a commando unit and maybe a few supports snuck in on an APC through a hole in your foes defecnes.

Ive seen and pulled off both of the above and theyre both equally satisfying, but fine percision is much easier to start with mostly because you can make the units quicker and it costs much less. The brute force method is a more absolute method but it takes alot of time and cash to biuld up the tanks and theres a fair chance your foe will find out and do something about it, probably with a well placed nuke.

Best is usually a combo of both, have the brute force on an attack move into your victims base, his attention will be focused there now, punch a hole in his defences on another side then add some specialised anti-biulding units and take down the base while hes distracted.
 

emeraldrafael

New member
Jul 17, 2010
8,585
0
0
Both really. I always carry a sniper rifle for when i need to pick off an enemey from farther away to save a mate, but pack a machine gun wtih a scope so that if it comes down to it i can spray the motherf-ker that dared to get close enough to me with enough bullets to make him paste.
 

Traun

New member
Jan 31, 2009
657
0
0
I love shotguns and explosives, both of which are pure brute force.
However you must be delusional if you think that you can use them to bruteforce your way in, they require tactics (hint: when you are using a shotgun, don't engage in a hallway).
 

HT_Black

New member
May 1, 2009
2,845
0
0
There's only one shot that counts, and it's the one that paints the wall with their brains.

So I've always been a fan of precision.
 

The Heik

King of the Nael
Oct 12, 2008
1,568
0
0
Buchholz101 said:
When you play games like Call of Duty or Battlefield or even Medal of Honor, do you prefer weapons with overwhelming force, or surgical precision?

We're assuming that Sniper rifles do not represent "Brute Force".
Depends on who or what I'm facing. If it's close quarters, then brute force. But if it's range or clear avenues of sight, then I go for surgical precision
 

Alar

The Stormbringer
Dec 1, 2009
1,355
0
0
I think it really depends on the weapon you're using. Something automated is designed to use a fair deal of ammunition, not just to hit the target but to ensure its destruction.

Likewise, a sniper rifle is designed to kill in a single shot. You have to know how to use every weapon, and adjust your firing style to suit.
 

ffxfriek

New member
Apr 3, 2008
2,068
0
0
a bit of both. it depends on my mood. but lethal efficiancy is more fun when not using noob tubes and such
 

Redlin5_v1legacy

Better Red than Dead
Aug 5, 2009
48,834
0
0
Accuracy whenever possible with a crazy brute force SMG or two in reserve (if I'm allowed). Quite frankly on most online maps you might as well get the weapon that will put down a man quickly and has a large fast firing cartridge seeing as that is what everyone else is doing.

I actually used to be a Shotgun only kind of guy but I got tired of getting cut down when I need to rush to get in firing range.
 
May 5, 2010
4,829
0
0
Somewhere in between. Although if given a choice between a sniper and a shotgun, I'll usually pick the sniper. But I really prefer a good old assault rifle.
 

Gethsemani_v1legacy

New member
Oct 1, 2009
2,551
0
0
Before I joined the army I was all about "Lethal Efficiency". But if there was one thing the army taught me it was that brute force is the name of the game. Aim, double tap (or burst fire which is usually more efficient in FPS games), repeat until the enemy dies and prosper. Close quarters map? Full Auto fire is your friend.

Brute Force also goes will with my playstyle of constant movement. You don't have time to line up a perfect shot when you advance on your enemies position.
 

Ekonk

New member
Apr 21, 2009
3,120
0
0
Depends. Most of the time it's efficiency, but sometimes it's just fun to burst in guns blazin'.