If you think about it, it doesn't make much sense... people don't usually have fur, do they (Unless they're werewolves)? So yes, a furry is basically a sexualized anthropomorphic animal fetish figure... you can partly thank Sally Acorn for that 0.ozehydra said:Actually, I thought Furries were people, not the characters they idolize.Adrian Madhog said:WRONG! The furries ARE the objects of sexualization you refer to, and the second group are perverts, aka people who are into furries.zehydra said:The first is a group of people constantly having to defend their enjoyment of anthropomorphic animals because of a fetish, yet still demand to be called by the same name.Adrian Madhog said:Do you know the difference between furries and people who are INTO furries?Biodeamon said:I believe your thinking of furries, not nerds....
The latter are almost always members of the first group anyway.
The More You Know.
Don't forget Sally Acorn, my friend... she's the quintessial furry fetish.thiosk said:There is nothing a single, middle aged woman needs more than yet more cats!
Wait, what? OH.
Cheetara: single-handedly creating an entire generation of furries.
Wasnt sally a child of the 90s? Cheetara is squarely rooted in the 80s.Adrian Madhog said:Don't forget Sally Acorn, my friend... she's the quintessial furry fetish.
Yes, exactly! And when did the whole furry craze begin?thiosk said:Wasnt sally a child of the 90s? Cheetara is squarely rooted in the 80s.Adrian Madhog said:Don't forget Sally Acorn, my friend... she's the quintessial furry fetish.