No. That would be ridiculous, and possibly sanctioning more dangerous ways of censoring speech.
"Sensitive" (older generation) people frowning about swearwords, is a situation where one might want to choose to avoid them so as not to offend when the solution is so simple (don't swear). But once you get into actual censoring in schools, offices, and media, then you are in a very dangerous situation.
Has anyone else realized what it means when words can be censored?(illegalized, in totalitarian/fascist enough countries) WORDS!?! How can we talk about free speech when we, even on just a social level, don't allow people to use certain words?
Look, I barely swear at all. But most of the swearwords I hear have no effect on me (Religious ones mean nothing, and the toilet/sex ones might have been intriguing when I was young and didn't fully understand, but are now equally powerless in offending me). And none of the people from my generation seem bothered by them either. But they are a great way to vent frustration (now you don't have to add a fist-sized hole to the wall. yay!).
So the people who have to swear at least once every sentence are annoying, but they are only annoying in the way people who have to say "like" at least once every sentence. These words used to mean something, now they have become more of a linguistic tool to show anger, frustration, panic, etc. They can still be used to offend people, but then it's usually directed at a specific person(s), and no-one else is meant to be offended (and shouldn't feel offended).