Poll: COD:WAW or Killzone 2
- Thread starter tmo99
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Both are terrible in my view, but it depends on what you like not others.
If you like WW2 shooters, go with COD:WaW
Sci-fi then Killzone 2
If you like WW2 shooters, go with COD:WaW
Sci-fi then Killzone 2
How about you buy Call of Duty 4? Its probably cheaper than World at War, and WAW took a few segments from it.
Go with Killzone, better multiplayer. The single player? Flip a coin. I think WaW has co-op though, which is a plus.
if it wasnt for the fact that all the helghast have british accents, i'd say killzone 2. as it stands, go for world at war
Well, considering you have friends that own CoD:WaW. I would say, pick it up, and start some co-op sessions with your buddies, not to mention, that you have a superb MP experience that you can enjoy with your comrades.
Killzone 2, while being a decent game (although I haven't played it yet, it's pretty obvious the game is on par with CoD), the sci-fi settings is much more interesting than the overdone WW2 game.
But someone did say "bros before hoes", so go with CoD:WaW.
Killzone 2, while being a decent game (although I haven't played it yet, it's pretty obvious the game is on par with CoD), the sci-fi settings is much more interesting than the overdone WW2 game.
But someone did say "bros before hoes", so go with CoD:WaW.
Single player, they are both good. Multiplayer, KZ2 wins hands-down. No other shooter I've played has as inventive game modes nor rewards teamwork as much.
KZ2 control takes some getting used to, tho.
KZ2 control takes some getting used to, tho.
Well I haven't played Killzone 2 yet, but I want it. And CoD:WaW was terrible, so naturally I voted for Killzone 2. Mainly because even if Killzone is bad, there are very few games that are worse then CoD:WaW in my pinion.
I would say Killzone 2
Although I haven't played WaW and there is no way I am ever going to buy it, mainly because I wouldn't be able to play it online on my internet.
Killzone 2 at least supports bots that provide some replay value, and its not one of the many WW2 games.
Or just get COD4 if you don't have it.
Although I haven't played WaW and there is no way I am ever going to buy it, mainly because I wouldn't be able to play it online on my internet.
Killzone 2 at least supports bots that provide some replay value, and its not one of the many WW2 games.
Or just get COD4 if you don't have it.
Don't get the WaW hate here...
I've not had a chance to play Killzone 2. I have however had a chance to play through a lot of World at War on the PS3, and I just recently got it for my PC, and I was satisfied. Not anything to cause an epiphany, but the multiplayer is great and the campaign, while taking a lot of mechanics from Modern Warfare, and even copy-pastes a few of the missions in some parts, is good enough to keep my personal interest in the game.
So, from my biased standpoint, I would suggest World at War, simply because it's the only one I've played.
I've not had a chance to play Killzone 2. I have however had a chance to play through a lot of World at War on the PS3, and I just recently got it for my PC, and I was satisfied. Not anything to cause an epiphany, but the multiplayer is great and the campaign, while taking a lot of mechanics from Modern Warfare, and even copy-pastes a few of the missions in some parts, is good enough to keep my personal interest in the game.
So, from my biased standpoint, I would suggest World at War, simply because it's the only one I've played.
I'd rather see a lot more multiformat games. It's nice to know some developers don't favour a single console fanbase.y8c616 said:
Of course, I wouldn't want to see too many PC only games becoming console games... But between consoles, especially between PS3 and 360, there should be more crossover.