Sakurazaki1023 said:
I have always wondered why Macs are considered to be the more artistic computers and have a large following of people who consider themselves indie and experimental with their computing.
Even as a Mac user, I have never understood the "Macs are artsy" crap. Most of the decent or widely-used music software is used on Windows and you are limited to Garageband and a few other things on a Mac. Photoshop is not exclusive to Apple computers. Windows has more advanced video-editing tools and a wider selection to choose from. And it's not like Mac had such things first or had them before anyone else for years because such applications have been around FOREVER. Sure, early on Apple might have had better tools, but a lot of them were produced by 3rd party companies.
Honestly, it would be more logical to market them as a computer for those who surf the web with reckless abandon, as there are significant less viruses and trojans made for the OS in comparison to Windows (partly due to Macs being unable to read or use exe files), since it certainly isn't a gaming console due to licensing issues over DirectX.
There are some cons about Macs which Apple is completely guilty of such as being upgrade-unfriendly (you can get Windows 7 on an old piece of shit laptop if you have enough Ram, but you need to buy a new computer to get Snow Leopard if you're still using a iBook G4 such as myself) and difficult or impossible to add in new hardware to allow for such upgrades because of near-sighted thinking, and there are others that they can't help such as specific types of hardware which Microsoft has the rights to (ie. a lot of shit they acquired in the 90s), meaning they have to manufacture their own shit, which is extremely expensive, meaning higher prices to break even.