Poll: Discussing Cryptozoology

Recommended Videos

Gentleman_Reptile

New member
Jan 25, 2010
865
0
0
Bigfoot, The Loch Ness Monster, El Chupacabre, Gods mercy......

Unless you live in a cave on one of the moons of Jupiter, then you have heard the stories of these mythical creatures. Countless sightings, witness testimonials, shaky footage and blurry photographs have given birth to some pretty incredible monster legends that at times can be quite compelling, and other times insultingly stupid.

But one cannot deny, that this is one of the more interesting subjects to sit and ponder about. But rather than sitting and pondering, share your views and your rationalisations here.

If I were voting on this poll, I would be choosing option two. When you think about it, alot of these animals make sound, biological sense. Take Bigfoot for instance. The legend paints him as the missing link. A half-man half-ape creature of above average size and strength that shyly keeps to itself in the most remote habitats possible.

Now on paper, that sounds like an entirely feasable life form, to me at least. Humans and apes are very closely related so it wouldnt be a stretch for mother nature to have crossed them over at some point, or for that offshoot to cross paths with us. The thing is, it's just extremely UNLIKELY for something so rare to survive. It is however, not impossible. (I know thats a pretty flaky thing to say but I'm not here to prove or disprove anything or to change your beleifs)

I'd like to draw your attention to an old news report from (I think) 2008.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtoQGeeTUAg

As far as I am concerned, that animal IS the Chupacabre. A mis-shapen canine hybrid that has devloped an odd body type due to continued breeding of largely incompatibal Cyotes and domestic dogs in a harsh environment, which has then started to breed a few dozen more. Goat Sucker? No, but a strange animal? Most certainly. I honestly believe that the Chupacabre is a real animal. It's just an anticlimactic canine hybrid that takes marginally different forms from area to area, and has been labelled as a creature of myth due to its odd appearance and limited sightings. That just makes sense to me.

An evolutionary misstep is not unreasonable, and it's even more likely that an unfortunate animal spawned from bad genes would be quite rare, and thus create a legend.

As far as creatures like Nessie go however, I'm not as optimistic. A modern day plesiosaur living in a lake is just too good of a story to be real. Yeah the Loch connects to the ocean so you could argue that the animal barely even spends any time there, and yeah it's possible in the same sense that anything in the universe is theoretically possible, but no, I dont think we will be hauling any massive aquatic lizards out of the Loch any time soon. I'd LOVE to believe we would be though....

Well I've given my keyboard enough of a beating for now, vote and discuss your views and stories on Cryptozoology. And whether or not I'm making sense to talking absolute gooseberries.
 

Hero in a half shell

It's not easy being green
Dec 30, 2009
4,285
0
0
One thing I am certain of is that Bigfoot is a hoax. If you do some research on his origins then you find it was made up by a a manager at a logger company, who was getting tools and equipment stolen from his site by thieves after dark, so he made some giant footprint sandals and ran about in the mud, to scare them off. It went further than he expected it to, making headlines, but because it did the job of scaring the vandals away he wasn't going to come clean and risk the looters coming back. Since then there have been a long line of hoaxers keeping it in the headlines, virtually all of which have been proven false. Any anecdotal sightings can be explained as bears, or other animals.
 

The Salty Vulcan

New member
Jun 28, 2009
2,441
0
0
Taipan700 said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtoQGeeTUAg

As far as I am concerned, that animal IS the Chupacabre. A mis-shapen canine hybrid that has devloped an odd body type due to continued breeding of largely incompatibal Cyotes and domestic dogs in a harsh environment, which has then started to breed a few dozen more. Goat Sucker? No, but a strange animal? Most certainly. I honestly believe that the Chupacabre is a real animal. It's just an anticlimactic canine hybrid that takes marginally different forms from area to area, and has been labelled as a creature of myth due to its odd appearance and limited sightings. That just makes sense to me.
I would have to agree. It;s just the most logical conclusion, and it makes more sense than a government conspiracy or extra-terrestrial visit. What's that old saying? The most baffling problems always have the simplist solutions?



Taipan700 said:
As far as creatures like Nessie go however, I'm not as optimistic. A modern day plesiosaur living in a lake is just too good of a story to be real. Yeah the Loch connects to the ocean so you could argue that the animal barely even spends any time there, and yeah it's possible in the same sense that anything in the universe is theoretically possible, but no, I dont think we will be hauling any massive aquatic lizards out of the Loch any time soon. I'd LOVE to believe we would be though....
See, that's where you and I differ on our views Amigo. I would like to remind y'all that scientists know more about the content of Space than they do about our own oceans. Several new species are being discovered each year within the darkest depths of the sea. Now that doesn't mean I believe a living dinosaur is swimming round, but it does seem more plausible (to me at least) than say Bigfoot.

Speaking of Bigfoot, theres simply no way a creature like this could possibly exist and not have any sufficient evidence other than say a footprint or some shakey camera work. You can't possible tell me that in all the years the US has been inhabited, no-one ever bagged themselves a Sasquatch. Just like our friend the Jackolope...



I'm chalking our hairy friend to circumstance and misunderstanding. To me, the legend of Bigfoot originated from a bear, and the legend simply grew and grew the more ears it reached. Just my thoughts so I'm afraid I have no evidence to support this theory. Hmmm. Seems to be a running gag with this guy ain't it?

By the way, for those wondering bout the Jackalope, here's your culprit.



Poor furry bastard. He's suffering from Shope papilloma virus. A rather nasty condition that causes horn-like facial tumours on rabbits. As you can see, it doesn't take that big a step of the imagination to see how the legend of a horned rabbit could emerge.

Hero in a half shell said:
One thing I am certain of is that Bigfoot is a hoax. If you do some research on his origins then you find it was made up by a a manager at a logger company, who was getting tools and equipment stolen from his site by thieves after dark, so he made some giant footprint sandals and ran about in the mud, to scare them off. It went further than he expected it to, making headlines, but because it did the job of scaring the vandals away he wasn't going to come clean and risk the looters coming back. Since then there have been a long line of hoaxers keeping it in the headlines, virtually all of which have been proven false. Any anecdotal sightings can be explained as bears, or other animals.
Gah! Ninja'd. But see, if that makes more sense than some ape-man ninja stalking the wilderness.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
20,105
4,493
118
There are all sorts of cryptids out there, but I seriously doubt any of them are big, distinctive apex predators that nobody has ever found evidence for.

Captcha: presene itheout
 

Bakuryukun

New member
Jul 12, 2010
392
0
0
Taipan700 said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtoQGeeTUAg
Fox News. The most reliable source of all.

Well at least it turned out the Kraken was realish.

The problem with cryptozoology, is that it's very unnecessary, even if these things are real then they would easily fall within the realm of explainable biology and it's other scientific ilk, pretty much leaving Cryptozoologists with nothing left but to look for these things, and while searching and studying are sometimes the same thing in science, in cases with animals with little to no actual documentation other than hearsay and postulation, it just becomes a big wild goose chase based on pre-conceived notions.