Squid94 said:
We're recognised within the intrernet and the technology community but in general, we're not. Think news, outside world....
Certainly agree with this, and it is, unfortunately, a problem of our own making- I think we were a bit too quick to identify the internet as the highly effective news-and-information (and discussion, and for want of a better word, multiplayer) dissemination tool, and that's cost us more 'visible' representation like print, broadcasting and physical locations.
While I'm not going so far as to suggest that the reason games have had such a hard time getting onto TV is because online coverage is so much better (I am firmly of the belief that it's the other way around- the reason we're all on the internet is because television refuses to cater for us in any non-tokenistic manner), it does exacerbate the situation- the same way that the games magazine market is disintegrating and the uptake of online multiplayer has made the idea of a LAN cafe that didn't go under long ago some kind of bizarre fantasy. This makes us look like the "kids in their bedrooms" D4zZ brings up, and means that we struggle to get any known faces to act as ambassadors, or at least build a brand someone faceless can stand next to.
That's not to say that this is the only problem, game content does need to broaden in all directions (and indeed, so does game coverage- 99% of consumer online content is either boring dry reviews, or humour videos that equate to little more than "here is something, it is shit, lol") and because of that we don't deserve as much rep as perhaps we think we do.
But we do certainly deserve more than we get.