Arfonious said:
I never stated that all soliders are mass murderers, only that their job allows them to and really is about murder.
A soliders role is to destroy the countrys enemies. You can't deny that their job isn't about violence.
The police are different, their role is to protect the people.[/quote]
Actually, all you stated (after someone said that not all soldiers are mass murders) is "So the majority of soliders aren't trained for battle?" This implied that it was their training made them mass murderers, but I imagine this wasn't what you wanted to get across so we'll just pop that aside for now.
Is a soldier's role to destroy the country's enemies? What about soldiers who work in their home country, who are they 'destroying'? You could just as easily say that the police exist to murder while skipping over the parts where they do things not directly involved with shooting people.
The soldier's role could be argued to 'protect the people' and I'm sure someone could find a good argument to suggest that the police doing things such as arresting drunks and breaking up large groups of 'loiterers' aren't doing much in the way of protecting people.
. Someone in the military is necessarily a front-line soldier and engineers, catering staff, medical staff, hell even officers filing paperwork are probably less likely to end up shooting someone than a police officer working in the slums.
I don't deny the job is about violence: I just have a great distaste for generalisations.
Sweeping statements are very easy to make, very hard to back up.