Poll: Do you buy DLC?

Recommended Videos

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,855
15
43
oh I WOULD but I cant

especially for Mass Effect where I really feel like Im missing out
 

Fusioncode9

New member
Sep 23, 2010
663
0
0
Only if it's something lengthy and for a game I love, ME2's Shadow Broker, RDR's Undead Nightmare, and Fallout 3's Broken Steel just to name a few. A lot of DLC can be cash ins but some of them are really high quality products.
 

yohlazy

New member
Jul 1, 2011
85
0
0
I buy DLC for games that I both like and have played I also look to see exactly what I am getting
 

KaizokuouHasu

New member
May 19, 2011
186
0
0
King Toasty said:
KaizokuouHasu said:
No. If the developers felt that their DLC wasn't important enough to put into the main game, then I don't think it is important enough to pay additional money for.

This mindset is going to kill me if they release an amazing expansion for Skyrim. ¬_¬
Expansion =/= DLC. Expansions are much bigger, generally worth the price, and usually come on a disc.
Bloodmoon... *drools* I wonder if we'll get something like that again.
 

InfectedStar

New member
Jul 7, 2011
177
0
0
I try not to buy too many DLCs now but I would, only if they benefit the story of a game not so much the multiplayer (i.e. Closing gaps, lengthing the game, or altering the ending.) Games that I have found to do this are more or less RPG games without a multiplayer setting to them so most are long enough to begin with like Fallout, Dragon Age, Mass Effect, and Fable.
 

devotedsniper

New member
Dec 28, 2010
752
0
0
Depends on the game, if its things like knights of the nine for oblivion or awakening for dragon age origins then yes if it's short and pointless like most of dragon age stuff then no.
 

King Toasty

New member
Oct 2, 2010
1,527
0
0
KaizokuouHasu said:
King Toasty said:
KaizokuouHasu said:
No. If the developers felt that their DLC wasn't important enough to put into the main game, then I don't think it is important enough to pay additional money for.

This mindset is going to kill me if they release an amazing expansion for Skyrim. ¬_¬
Expansion =/= DLC. Expansions are much bigger, generally worth the price, and usually come on a disc.
Bloodmoon... *drools* I wonder if we'll get something like that again.
*sigh* If only. At least we won't get the Horse Armour DLC for Skyrim.
 

Iwata

New member
Feb 25, 2010
3,326
0
0
If the DLC is appealing, and the price is right, then yes, I buy DLC. I mean, it gave me the opportunity for Force-kick Ewoks in TFUII, so why not?

Others, like the mini-campaigns for Bioshock 2, Red Dead Redemption and Borderlands are great value for money, and a non-multiplayer-based extension of the original's gameplay.

There are exceptions. I bought Dead Money, the first DLC for New Vegas, but I think I'll hold out on the others until the inevitable GotY edition comes out. And I never, ever, EVER buy map packs.
 

Ascarus

New member
Feb 5, 2010
605
0
0
to some degree. i have purchased DLC for DA:Origins and ME2. but that is it.

i will only purchase DLC for games that have impressed me enough that i want to see more of the world in which they take place.
 

FoolKiller

New member
Feb 8, 2008
2,409
0
0
NickCaligo42 said:
FoolKiller said:
Music for rock band and anything that significantly enriches the story.
That can't really be any DLC, though, can it? If it were significant, I'd figure that it'd be in the finished game.
A lot of the Dragon Age stuff was pretty good. Especially things like Leliana's Song... The extra stuff for Resident Evil 5 is another good example.
 

OriginZero

New member
Jun 15, 2011
12
0
0
I bought map packs before for Halo games and Call of Duty. But then I never really played those games. Outside of shooters, now that I think about it, I haven't really bought any DLC. I'm not really for that, we'll add missions to games you can buy later; which is the LA Noire method.

After watching an Extra Credits episode; though, I see that it seems that many of these companies do it to get profits lost due to used game sales. Obviously, that's only a small reason, but I can kinda understand that situation; I honestly just never thought of that before.

I still don't love the concept of DLC.

Edit: Let me clarify, I don't like how DLC is done now with a single thing at a time. I wouldn't be terribly opposed to the idea of expansions for games (PC games have done it for years). Why not just create far more than one thing or separate things to get it all at once?
 

Electric Alpaca

What's on the menu?
May 2, 2011
388
0
0
All the time. I'm sensible and don't squander my money on flavour of the moment games, making informed decisions and purchasing games that I know I will enjoy.

That results in me wanting to extend the game time in the world I enjoy by any means I can, and as long as £1 = 1 hour I really can't complain.
 

KaizokuouHasu

New member
May 19, 2011
186
0
0
King Toasty said:
KaizokuouHasu said:
King Toasty said:
KaizokuouHasu said:
No. If the developers felt that their DLC wasn't important enough to put into the main game, then I don't think it is important enough to pay additional money for.

This mindset is going to kill me if they release an amazing expansion for Skyrim. ¬_¬
Expansion =/= DLC. Expansions are much bigger, generally worth the price, and usually come on a disc.
Bloodmoon... *drools* I wonder if we'll get something like that again.
*sigh* If only. At least we won't get the Horse Armour DLC for Skyrim.
At least let us revisit Solstheim. I seem to remember leaving a pretty neat estate on Raven Rock. That's where I kept all my legendary items and shiz. And by George did I decorate that place neatly!
 

LordLundar

New member
Apr 6, 2004
962
0
0
Depends on the game and DLC. If I think a game is crap and/or the DLC is overpriced or just plain not worth the price (see Railworks or Any of the Valve DLC) then it won't happen. Stuff like the DLC for Magicka though is a steal at double the price as far as I'm concerned.