I don't really care for multiplayer. I'll make a thread explaining why some other time. Right now, I just want to know if I'm in a tiny minority of gamers that have no real interest in it or if many gamers don't.
Because spending more than a minute learning to play would be such a drain on your obviously powerful intellect..robert632 said:i'm inbetween cos some games can have fun multiplayer that almost anyone can pick-up and understand how to play(l4d is a very easy game to understand, for example.), but then others( for me it's halo 3.) that i always die within 1 minute of re-spawning, so i end up rage quitting.
have you heard of what a hyperbole is? cos if you haven't you better look it up before this turns into a flame war.Cyenwulf said:Because spending more than a minute learning to play would be such a drain on your obviously powerful intellect..robert632 said:i'm inbetween cos some games can have fun multiplayer that almost anyone can pick-up and understand how to play(l4d is a very easy game to understand, for example.), but then others( for me it's halo 3.) that i always die within 1 minute of re-spawning, so i end up rage quitting.
You've been given no reason to insult him. Keep these forums a happy place bro.Cyenwulf said:Because spending more than a minute learning to play would be such a drain on your obviously powerful intellect..robert632 said:i'm inbetween cos some games can have fun multiplayer that almost anyone can pick-up and understand how to play(l4d is a very easy game to understand, for example.), but then others( for me it's halo 3.) that i always die within 1 minute of re-spawning, so i end up rage quitting.
My thoughts exactly although Halo 3 is an exception to the PC rule which is generally true.xmetatr0nx said:While i prefer local multiplayer and usually stick with that, i dont mind it. It has its good moments, which generally out weighs the bad, specially on the PC.