I watch him and still like him, not for opinions but for the inherent charm in listening to an angry British person rant.
Things I really disagree with him on.
1: The idea that web-swinging around an open world is the only reason to really play a Spider-Man game. He claims he likes how they treat web-swinging like an extreme sports game. The problem with that? If I wanted to play an extreme sports game, I'd play an extreme sports game. I play a superhero game to beat people up. He suggests for Spider-man 2 it would be wise to get through the story missions and just play in the huge open world. I did this, and I got real bored real fast.
2. He spreads the idea the idea that the early Monkey Island games are inherently better then the later Monkey Island games. The early games aren't worse, but they aren't that much better.
3. His complaints about Nintendo's general business strategy. He complains that new Mario, new Zelda, new Metroid, and others come out too often. I say it is not Nintendo itself that has the fans but Nintendo's franchises that has the fans. To reword what Yahtzee has complained about, Nintendo has created several gaming franchises that sell like crazy each time new installments come out, and hes upset about them every once in awhile coming out with new installments. Of course Ninetendo is going to do this! Congratulations man, you're complaining about Nintendo not being business morons. The way things are now, some gamers are somewhat upset at Nintendo, claiming Nintendo is holding gaming back as a medium, but if Nintendo stopped doing this, the fans who actually regularly make them money would be majorly pissed off. There could be more then on average two games per console, and It's not like Nintendo doesn't try new stuff occasionally, (Creating Pikmin, Publishing Eternal Darkness) but when they do it is always a gamble on whether or not they will sell. (Eternal Darkness sold way less then it should have.)