I think it will stick around until something better comes along. Most franchises do...except Nintendo's.
Well the reason a lot of people hate its popularity is because a lot of other developers try to emulate COD by adding COD elements into their FPSs. As a result the FPS market becomes more and more homogenized and over-saturated with COD clones. One of the reasons a lot of Battlefield series veterans were unsatisfied with Battlefield 3 was because it added COD elements to the game.Vigormortis said:I would have preferred a: "Hard to say yet how popular Call of Duty will be going forward into the new gen, or how long it will retain that popularity."
Or, even better: "Does it matter either way?"
I don't get it. I'm not really a fan of the series now-a-days either but to honestly believe, as many in here seem to, that it is somehow a cancer on the gaming industry is ludicrous at best.
Honestly sit back and reassess your perspectives on the industry. You'll quickly realize that Call of Duty, as it is today, isn't the disease plaguing the industry. It's a symptom. A small piece of a much, much larger, systemic issue.
I fixed it for you. On topic I don't think it will die. It is a popular franchise and they always continue.Mr.K. said:Justin Beiber
Zachary amaranths answer said a lot of what i wanted to say. Copy cats chasing success is an issue wth the industry that killing cod wont fix. Id also add there were plenty of shooters knocking around long before cod4 arrived, admittedly the console proliferation came later than on the PC. So i guess we disagree. I put it down to it being cool to hate cod.immortalfrieza said:That's the problem, it DOES affect everyone. Due to COD's success, every video game developer out there is trying to emulate COD's formula in an attempt to grab it's audience, and as a result otherwise great games are being turned into bland brown shooters. The reason why COD dying out would be good for the industry is that developers would STOP DOING THAT! COD is ruining the quality of countless games throughout the industry just by existing, Mario, Madden, Fifa, Street Fighter, and other games that have been the same over and over with every release haven't done this, and that's why they get a pass. It doesn't hurt that each of them actually deviate from their formulas once in a while either.bjj hero said:There is a lot of hate here. Why would people come out and say they want a game to flop. Lots of people enjoy it and plenty of people would lose their job if it bombed. If you dont like it then dont play it. It wont affect you.
It's not really COD that is the problem, it is the underlying attitude that is leading so many companies to try and emulate it. Triple A gaming is expensive, and developers are constantly looking for blockbusters to rake in the profits. COD is the current "top dog" so that is the game they are all trying to clone. Just like when WOW was at it's peak it caused MMO's to become saturated with "WOW killers".Zachary Amaranth said:You're talking about treating the symptoms to cure the underlying cause. While they're following CoD, the problem is they're following something, and that's been an issue since the beginning of gaming. Pong Clones, Donkey Kong Clones, Super Mario Clones, Twin Hitler Clones, etc. etc etc etc. The industry is always looking for something to follow. If CoD dies, it will look for something else. This is not a good thing, nor is it healthy. It means that there is an endemic problem underlying the brown shooter patches on the surface.
I just covered how that's not true, so let's move on....immortalfrieza said:1. Everybody and his mother hasn't been copying Mario or those other games, while EVERYBODY wants a piece of the COD pie, even people that aren't even making shooters are aiming for COD's audience and
Could you rephrase that into something intelligible? Too many commas make for confusion. You even look like you contradict yourself.2. the clones have IMPROVED AND INNOVATED on those game's formula, while with COD everybody is just cut and pasting COD's look, controls, and atmosphere straight for the most part, and those few that don't do that don't deviate from that formula that much and don't get the recognition they need to make a difference in the industry as a whole anyway.
Of course, the knockoff mentality was a large contributing factor in the 80s video game crash, but it was largely positive.Mario, Metroid, Pong, etc., copying those had largely positive impact on the video game industry, but copying COD hasn't, and that's why the former gets a pass.
No downside except a possible diminished investment in gaming as a whole because it no longer looks like a tenable market. You left that part out, and it's rather important. Your expectations are unrealistic and speak more to your "optimism" than any realistic understanding of the corporate mindset.If COD were to die out, it would not only send a message to at least a few developers and publishers that it's probably a bad idea to just blindly copy the next big thing, the industry would switch to emulating some other popular game franchise, and maybe they'd actually put some effort into making those games worthwhile, and if not, well, the industry would be no worse off than it already was. At worst, COD dying would cause things to barely change, and at best it would result in a complete about face in the practices of the video game industry, there's really no downside.
Basically what I thought too. At some point we will cease to be interested, but who knows when this will happen? They do deliver good games if you like the kind of game they do deliver (not interested in it myself), but it wont last forever. Nothing does.Zhukov said:Eh, nothing lasts forever. Just ask the Romans. Or Blizzard.
It's not going to die any time soon though. I'd say it's got at least another five years of, at the very least, even sales.
It will be a slow sputtering downturn though, not a sudden crash.