I'm definitely thinkin' yes. The timing and the overall political and economic state of the world, how many people are just pissed off and... well, crazy.
It'll probably happen.
It'll probably happen.
You're misusing the term "personal" to mean "intense feeling" as in western world personal issues do tend to be more intense than politics, but that's not definitive. That's just fortunate for us.Ryotknife said:ehhhhTreblaine said:Yes, killed by his POLITICAL OPPOSITION! It wan't personal. He was killed for his politics.Elementary - Dear Watson said:Quoted for truth...Treblaine said:Yes. We already have. Gadaffi.
Assassination: "Alternatively, assassination may be defined as "the act of deliberately killing someone, especially a public figure, usually for hire or for political reasons.""
So, that is what we saw in Libya when Qadaffi was murdered by his opposition...
By your own definition he was assassinated.
it probably got pretty personal towards the end due to all of the bombing, shelling, and whatnot.
Yeah, then there was that story of that poor old mustachioed man who was driven to suicide along with his girlfriend in some sort of bunker... oh what was his name? Hilters? Atler?zumbledum said:we already did, just a year or so ago that leader , Father of two and loving husband was shot on his knees in his own home in front of his family by a government owned murder squad.
osama something? os was it saddam i cant remember
Kind of true, her assassination was the main thing that pushed certain stupid people to vote for her husband(other voters were bought and paid for and some were brainwashed. But this guy has also served jail time and he boasts about it. In fact most of the top members of the ruling Pakistan People's Party have spent time in jail and boast about it claiming it was "their sacrifice for democracy".Uber Evil said:People like that don't deserve to die. Maybe get ousted and kicked out the country, but killing them would not really solve anything.Arif_Sohaib said:Her name was Benizer Bhutto. She was one of the most corrupt politicians in the country and her husband and our current president Asif Ali Zardari is much much worse. Our Prime Minister was just ousted yesterday by our Chief Justice for defying Supreme Court orders to write a letter to the Swiss to continue investigation of Zardari's corruption and the next guy Zardari proposed for Prime Minister just received an arrest warrant for involvement in narcotics(he was our health minister).LooK iTz Jinjo said:You can have our opposition leader... No seriously, please take him!
[http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/521/tonyabbott.jpg/]![]()
Didn't the Pakistani opposition leader get shot and killed a few years ago? She was someone of importance at least, if not the opposition leader.
The Balochistan Chief Minister and another one of Zardari's supporters has said "a degree is a degree weather real or fake", he said this when the educational degrees of several ministers were under scrutiny for being fake(and several were found to be fake).
Don't tell me these kind of people don't deserve to be assassinated.
It's an average, which isn't taking into account the actual assassinations aren't spread nicely. My point mostly was to illustrate that when it comes to major events we live quite a while longer than our collective memory typically lasts.Joseph Harrison said:You seem to forget that three of those assassinations occurred in a fifty year period (Lincoln, Garfield, McKinley). Don't estimate that there will be an assassination because there hasn't been one an awhile.Kargathia said:A fact often overlooked in this era with the collective memory of a goldfish is that "our lifetime" is quite a while.
In the US already it's hitting a rough average of an assassination every 50 years (4 assassinated presidents, 200 years existence). Throw all the other developed nations into the mix, and I would be genuinely surprised if I don't get to see one.
I do agree that we will probably see one in our lifetime, the world is vast and none here is probably older than 40, but since the tumultuous 60's, 70's and 80's, assassinations and assassination attempts have died down. I think that terrorism is the new way of striking fear into peoples hearts nowadays.
The white man leaves the black man a country in such poor shape that if the black man so much as sneezes next to it it will fall over... and people are screaming for President Obama's blood?Terminate421 said:I wouldn't be surprised if Obama was shot as he was re-elected again.
I'm not saying I want him to be but considering the damage he's caused and people are wanting him out of office who knows what could happen.
Sympathise? no thats too far but empathise , easily but thats a whole different thread.Treblaine said:Yeah, then there was that story of that poor old mustachioed man who was driven to suicide along with his girlfriend in some sort of bunker... oh what was his name? Hilters? Atler?zumbledum said:we already did, just a year or so ago that leader , Father of two and loving husband was shot on his knees in his own home in front of his family by a government owned murder squad.
osama something? os was it saddam i cant remember
Or that poor black man endlessly pursued through the jungles of Central Africa just for "taking" so many orphaned children. Jack Kony? John Kony? It was J-something Kony.
[/sarc]
Oh yeah, you might want to put that "[/sarc]" mark where you are being facetious and erroneous or people might make the mistaken belief you actually sympathise with that malicious gleefully mass murdering terrorists and are defending him and his evil cause with deception.
While all his close lieutenants wore suicide belts 24/7 and the SEALs learned quickly that trying to take them alive only leads to more people dying, finding him clothed and standing ON HIS FEET (not on his knees) you absolutely cannot take any chance except to shoot him immediately. They can't claim ignorance, they know when the SEALs come if they want to live they must strip naked to prove they don't have an incredibly lethal weapon of mass killing that they practically pioneered.
"Murdered on knees" vs "shot while standing" is not a matter of perspective. It's a matter of deception.zumbledum said:Sympathise? no thats too far but empathise , easily but thats a whole different thread.
it wasnt sarcasm it was a different pov to yours. and i know they found him on his feet i said they murdered him on his knees. there never were any WMD's thats been proven and admitted to in court. infact it was a total and complete lie a fabrication used to justify an imperialist war of ideology and conquest. America pioneed wmd's , Hiroshima , nagasaki , 2 civilian centres nuked! not military targets but civilian! the idea to win through terror using WMD's.
In my country the police dispense justice and the army fight wars. for us to go after someone they have to be proven guilty, theres a whole big greek think about it arrestes and all that lot , quite a few civilised countries adopted rule of law over the years.
Its what seperates cold bloodied murder from justice.
Well Saddam was executed, not assassinated, and Gaddafi could be argued either way.Sylveria said:Don't Qaddafi and Saddam count?
It was clear from square one they weren't getting out of anything alive, might as well have been assassinations.DJjaffacake said:Well Saddam was executed, not assassinated, and Gaddafi could be argued either way.Sylveria said:Don't Qaddafi and Saddam count?
Still not assassination though, Saddam's execution was inevitable, but still legal.Vegosiux said:It was clear from square one they weren't getting out of anything alive, might as well have been assassinations.DJjaffacake said:Well Saddam was executed, not assassinated, and Gaddafi could be argued either way.Sylveria said:Don't Qaddafi and Saddam count?
I do recall a Swedish minister getting stabbed to death a few years ago tho. How "major" that is, up to debate, of course, but the definition of "major" seems rather askew sometimes.