Hammeroj said:
TheBear17 said:
Istvan said:
Unless you hold a belief for a rational reason which can be debated sensibly there's really no way to argue with it.
who gets to define rational
People? Who gets to define anything?
Rational thinking is the use of reason to form your thoughts/beliefs/etc. "It makes me feel better" is not a reason
of any sort to make a truth claim.
Alar said:
Jodah said:
Not until I make up my own mind at least. I'm an agnostic so I can't very well change someone's mind if I can't make up my own.
I don't think agnosticism is a lack of making a decision... saying that it can't be proven either way is a decision in and of itself.
'I don't know' is not a decision nor an opinion. And saying something can't be proven nor disproven is giving a baseless hypothesis too much credit. You do realise that there's almost literally an infinity of potential hypotheses that can neither be proven nor disproven? You can think of millions (given the time) right there on the spot. Unless you're ready to give the same benefit of the doubt to a guy who believes in unicorns, it's being severely hypocritical to give religions a free pass.
I don't really view agnosticism as much of a religion, either. Religions tend to be ordered things with specific belief systems, culture, traditions, and practices revolving around them. Agnosticism only falls partly under a specific belief system, typically being, "I don't believe in a god, but I can't prove that there is or isn't one."
I believe that there is intelligent life on other planets, but that doesn't mean I can prove it. It also doesn't mean it can be disproved, because at the time being we don't have the technology to do so. Does that mean that evidence of god or aliens could be proven or dis-proven at some point in the future? I think so, yes.
And yeah, I'm more than willing to say that people who believe in a god have a chance to be right. Does that mean I'll believe him just because he has an ancient magic book that says so? No.
And coming to the conclusion of, "It could be, it could also not be, there's no way you can prove it either way." does require a lot of thought. I spent the better half of my life coming to decide upon that after lots of introspective thought and studying various religions from around the world, as well as practicing one of them up until I was fourteen. I didn't just go, "Hrmm, I'm hungry, better eat." The fact that you equate the two together would be insulting if I cared more about it. I spent months and months reading and asking questions and finding out everything I could until I finally accepted what I believe in.
So, sure. We can disagree. I think that deciding upon agnosticism is a big decision. Are there people out there who are just too lazy to make up their mind and choose it? I have little doubt in that, but there are also people like me who actually take these things seriously and put in a lot of time and effort to come to what they feel is the right conclusion.
It is a decision. It is an opinion. Get over it.