What you say makes a lot of sense and my friends have said similar things I am tempted to give it another go because they do occasionally do some great deals.NightHawk21 said:I would say give it another try and keep an open mind. Most of the problems you list are problems with modern PC gaming (and even somewhat distant past PC gaming) rather than just steam.Maximum Bert said:*snip*
The account issue is true, but you really only have to sign in once, then you can set steam to remember your credentials and its really just 1 extra button click to access your games. This still works even if you don't have it to start up on boot (which is something I would never recommend for any program).
Steam also has an offline mode. You simply have to be online to get the game and do any updates. I believe GOG uses a similar model where you have to download the game then you never need to go online again.
As for the performance issue, I would suggest you try again. I don't know what laptop you're using or when you tried it, but steam doesn't have too big an impact. For reference my laptop was like $500 at bestbuy 2 years ago and I don't notice any performance drops.
The fact that they could take all your games away, I total agree with, but I feel that's not exactly a problem with steam, but more with modern gaming in general. Nowadays with most games having an online component, companies can almost remotely shut off the whole or at least a significant portion of the game. Going back to GOG, it is possible too that they do the same thing as well. Envision a scenario where they don't meet profit margins and have to shut down. What happens to all the games you purchased? In all likelihood you would probably have a small window of time to download as many as possible before they become permanently unavailable. I believe steam said at one point they would do the same sort of thing, where they would open up all the games in your account for download, but that may have been a rumor as I didn't read an original credible source on that.
PC games not being able to trade in is right, back when SWAT 3 was brand new the trade in price was 2 dollars Solder of Fortune: $5, so if you consider that trading in at any sort of value then that's you. With games like Warcraft 3 you would break the EULA and they could ban your account ending the ability for you to play. There is a note at the bottom stating the info is subject to change and it's dated so not sure what else you want to be done there.klaynexas3 said:I'm not a fan of that image, one of the parts about the Xbone(paying full price for a used game) isn't totally confirmed yet, and PC games never being capable of trade is a crock of shit, because back in the days when it was primarily disc based, you could trade them like you can with current consoles. Only when the online stores came along and the use of buying physical copies of PC games became obsolete did we lose the ability to trade our PC games with other people.Snotnarok said:snip
If the Xbone was entirely digital, while it still would need some tweaks, it would be a hell of a lot more acceptable. Allowing other people to play games on your library is an amazing feature(for a digital store) that I would love online stores like steam to implement. However, because it is still a physically based console(you still use discs for your games, though that's dropped somewhat as a requirement thanks to the last generation), these are faults for it. The console was supposed to be for the accessibility, now the Xbone is losing that accessibility. If the gaming community can stamp that our here, we'll still keep consoles the way they are, allowing for it to be great on its own.
How are the two in any way comparable? As has been stated many times, the only similarity is that both are DRM, but are handled so differently that you really can't draw parallels with them. Steam constantly puts games on sale, allows offline access for practically forever, and is completely free. Xbone requires a purchase to grant "features" (such as used game lending) that are usually expected of a gaming console.FreedomofInformation said:All this Xbox fiasco has proven with regards to Steam, is that a large proportion of PC gamers are utter raging hypocrites.
They...both distribute games? Yeah, That is findamentally the same. On a similar note, a monkey and a dog are also fundamentally they same. Because by "minor details" you seem to mean stuff like market share. How many people using a PC use Steam? Well, a lot, obviously - there is a large userbase, but "a lot" suffeces for now. Compare it with the market share of Xbox One on the Xbox platform. That's not "a lot", that's going to be 100%. Literally. But apparently that's a minor detail. Same with the dog being a canine and the monkey not - just something we shouldn't concern ourselves with.FreedomofInformation said:Aside from the minor details, the fundamentals of the Xbox and Steam problem are the same.