Ah, I do like me some Douglas Adams alright. I haven't read those books in years actually, I should get around to it again. And of course he's infinitely quotable...
My main problem with Douglas Adams is the eternal "There's no God" point throughout his work but I've always felt it is him presenting his opinion as if it is fact because he says it.molesgallus said:What?manythings said:My sentiments exactly. Atheism is all well and good but I don't see why a person's opinion is treated as proof of no God.Spinozaad said:A brilliant guy, but he's no Pratchett.
I agree that he is presenting a biased point of view but I found some of his comments quite tongue-in-cheek and lighthearted. And it's never integral to the books, just random stuff he threw in everywhere. Like thismanythings said:My main problem with Douglas Adams is the eternal "There's no God" point throughout his work but I've always felt it is him presenting his opinion as if it is fact because he says it.
Douglas Adams' stuff can get a bit hard to follow at times, but if ever i try to read more than 1 discworld book at a time, i lose track of what im reading. They are a tad repetative, you have to admit.Simriel said:I can only read so much Adams at a time. His books are entirely based on not making any real sense. With Pratchett, there is sense. A special internal sense that exists only for Discworld, but still sense.molesgallus said:I'd say they were at least on par. I'm a big fan of both; couldn't think of favouring one over the other. Both have different qualities and weaknesses, but both are/were brilliant.Simriel said:Not quite Pratchett, but an amazing, entertaining, hilarious read. 'Sorry for the inconvenience'