Same here. This would make me watch the film for sure. (It may be crude but it sure as hell will get people to watch it.EspirituExterminatus said:
Poll: Emma Watson and Daniel Radcliffe to have nude scene in final Harry Potter films?
- Thread starter Caligulove
- Start date
I really, really don't care
Don't get me wrong, I used to love the books when I was a kid. And I loved how it "grew up" with me, rather than staying a kid's book whilst I moved on, I thought that was cool
But I read the last book
Pisspoor, deus ex machiana, rambling and based off the plot of a poor JRPG (Travel the land to find the magical items to defeat the loosely-explained forcefield surrounding the big boss!)
Oh...and with a Ernst Hemingway level of passion and emotion in the dialouge
And that bit where
That was such a weak part of the book, it was all too pathetic for me to contemplate
Don't get me wrong, I used to love the books when I was a kid. And I loved how it "grew up" with me, rather than staying a kid's book whilst I moved on, I thought that was cool
But I read the last book
Pisspoor, deus ex machiana, rambling and based off the plot of a poor JRPG (Travel the land to find the magical items to defeat the loosely-explained forcefield surrounding the big boss!)
Oh...and with a Ernst Hemingway level of passion and emotion in the dialouge
And that bit where
Voldermort "kills" Harry, but rather than walk TEN FEET just to make sure that, oh, I don't know: the one person on earth that was a danger to him WAS DEAD, he sends the one person in his posse at the time who clearly had reasons to betray voldemort (Draco was kinda being tortured/imprisoned into voldemort's ideology) when he could have sent his undyingly loyal hot goth chick instead, who would have not only checked if Harry was alive, but used the killing curse on him again regardless, for fun
That was such a weak part of the book, it was all too pathetic for me to contemplate
I think some of you are forgetting the point, that this scene is actually in the book. It's not like they had these two actors and were like "LOL, what if we put them naked together?"
And like someone else said, It will probably be mostly concealed, probably similar to the effect used for Lord of the Rings when frodo wears the ring, but conveniently placed to hide anything that would make it particularly explicit.
And like someone else said, It will probably be mostly concealed, probably similar to the effect used for Lord of the Rings when frodo wears the ring, but conveniently placed to hide anything that would make it particularly explicit.
There's no 'I don't care' option, I assume, because the creator of this thread wouldn't think people that didn't like Harry Potter would come here, let alone comment with something that doesn't contribute to the discussion at all. But let me get this straight I'm not saying that you should care, I'm just saying that you shouldn't have commented.Dark knifer said:
SInce I see the films as abominations compared to the books I couldn't give two shits if they nude up or not but comgrats too the ones that do enjoy the movies.
This fills me with effeminate fury!
I'm a die hard, I view any change as being poison to the roots. I really, really don't want to see it done, especially since from what I hear it's being substituted for a scene which represents the tortured internal struggle of Ron's romantic feelings combined with his camraderie with Harry, and replaces it with sexualisation of the first order.
Bad form.
I'm a die hard, I view any change as being poison to the roots. I really, really don't want to see it done, especially since from what I hear it's being substituted for a scene which represents the tortured internal struggle of Ron's romantic feelings combined with his camraderie with Harry, and replaces it with sexualisation of the first order.
Bad form.
Just give me an Emma Watson sex tape (hottest famous chick on Earth IMO) and im good!
Daniel Radcliffe? Naked??? NO!!! Hes got a gay voice, hes better off in a homo scene with Ron.
Emma Watson naked? WHERE DO I SIGN!!! (already voted YES in the poll)
It should make the last 2 movies bearable to watch to say the least. The last book was so bad I think it gave me cancer...I am very disappointed with the final Harry Potter book and I think that it shouldnt even exist
Daniel Radcliffe? Naked??? NO!!! Hes got a gay voice, hes better off in a homo scene with Ron.
Emma Watson naked? WHERE DO I SIGN!!! (already voted YES in the poll)
It should make the last 2 movies bearable to watch to say the least. The last book was so bad I think it gave me cancer...I am very disappointed with the final Harry Potter book and I think that it shouldnt even exist
Voldemort dies in like 2 lines?? They spend 7 whole books building up how powerful Voldemort is and he dies in 2 FUCKING LINES!? Pathetic, absolutely pathetic!
We have a culture which constantly states that breasts are sexual things. They're coveted, fetishistic. It follows that any breasts on show are there to be looked at as sexual objects for the sake of gaining attention. 'Course, no-one ever stops to think that a similar attraction might exist for the male body but hey, since when is -that- new?xplay3r said:
Not everything to do with breasts is to please men. There are such things as attractive male bodies and women who, if you will, get horny. Not every display of flesh is sexual. If only everyone got over it like that.
To do with the breasts on show thing, it pisses me off that women can't take their shirts off on a hot day, for example. It's illegal actually, indecent exposure. The thing is that if I was to go shirtless I wouldn't want everyone around going "Ohhh! Breasts!" I'd want them to treat it as no different to a guy taking his shirt off and strolling around ie. perfectly ordinary and acceptable.
Eh, get over it, I say. Who cares, it's just nudity. Although Emma Watson nude would be very hot.
I can understand the anger over that, but culture takes a long ass time to change, especially when the vast vast majority see no reason to change. It's a self-feeding condition - women don't bare their breasts because it's just not something women do. And men yearn for bare breasts because it's not something women do UNLESS there is a sexual element involved.Labyrinth said:
You know all that, you're smart, but it's not something that will change easily or quickly... My thought on the matter is.. you do your best to keep your breasts where you want them to be, and I, personally, will make a whole hearted effort to attempt to apply proper context to them, and that's really all each individual can hope to do. Hopefully one day enough will follow and see others following that the cultural taboo will go away.
Interesting Side Note - In the US, it IS legal to bear your breasts.. but only to protest that it's illegal for you to bear your breasts. If you bear them in protest, they're a constitutionally protected symbol. It's a really fucked up system once you realize that.
I forgot about that bit. But you're avsolutely right.Amethyst Wind said:
It's the bit where Ron stabs the Locket, right?
We'll never hear the end of that one. Maybe if they put more stuff into the 6th one they might not have to spend the first part of the double film explaining everything they missed out.imahobbit4062 said:
But I've read the books so I must see them unfortunately.
