You can refuse to use the term all you wan't, and I understand why, but that's what they're called.bobknowsall said:You see, here in Ireland we refuse to use the term "British Isles" in the Dail. It's considered something of an insult, for reasons I'm sure you can understand.
Well, I did specifically say "in the Dail". That's not a linguistic tic, btw. It's our National Assembly.scumofsociety said:You can refuse to use the term all you wan't, and I understand why, but that's what they're called.bobknowsall said:You see, here in Ireland we refuse to use the term "British Isles" in the Dail. It's considered something of an insult, for reasons I'm sure you can understand.
Why would I do that? They've been the British Isles since the Romans were around.bobknowsall said:And, you see, that's where we run into a little problem. You could call them "England and Ireland", you could call them "these islands", which is what they're called in official documentation, or you could call them the "Anglo-Celtic Islands" if you were feeling fancy.
Or, even more intelligently, they could be called the "British-Irish Isles", which would eliminate the problem entirely. Hmm?
No such thing as either. Britian consists of Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and England. Four countries that have completely different accents. And within these countries there are many more accents. There isn't a "British" accent and there isn't an "English" accent.mirror said:As an American who's never met someone from the U.K., and I've been having trouble lately deciding whether to refer to it as an english accent or a british accent. Which one do you tend to say?
No. Northern Ireland is part of ``Great Britain and Northern Ireland''.Kortney said:Britian consists of Northern Ireland, ...
Nope. If I said "Great Britain" consists of that, you'd have a point. But I said "Britain". Britain is a very commonly used synonym for the UK.Lukeje said:No. Northern Ireland is part of ``Great Britain and Northern Ireland''.Kortney said:Britian consists of Northern Ireland, ...
I'm welsh and it's time to raaaaageeeeee!!Dags90 said:no one really cares for the Welsh[footnote]This is just a joke for demonstrative purposes, I swear.[/footnote].
British covers more area, so you're less likely to piss off the Welsh
Ah, you see, that's a logical assertion that doesn't follow.scumofsociety said:Why would I do that? They've been the British Isles since the Romans were around.bobknowsall said:And, you see, that's where we run into a little problem. You could call them "England and Ireland", you could call them "these islands", which is what they're called in official documentation, or you could call them the "Anglo-Celtic Islands" if you were feeling fancy.
Or, even more intelligently, they could be called the "British-Irish Isles", which would eliminate the problem entirely. Hmm?
No matter how much I may or may not want to be part of the EU, England and the rest of the British Isles are part of Europe. When I am refering to Europe as a whole I say "Europe", not "England and Europe".
There aren't any countries called Britain either. The British Empire came out of the British Isles, not the other way round.bobknowsall said:Ah, you see, that's a logical assertion that doesn't follow.
Europe has been around for ages, and England has quite happily been a part of Europe since it formed. And the last time I checked, the English proved very fond of Europe. Great deal of attempted (and some successful) conquests.
The "European Union" is a political construct. The continent's name inspired the organisation, not the other way around. But the whole "Europe-EU" thing is irrelevant, because it's got little to do with the actual problem.
The salient question is this: Are there any countries called Europe? Was there a "European Empire"? Is there any reason why being part of a continent is offensive? Because that's something I'd really like to see you elaborate on.
Well, the "country" and "empire" bits were meant to be kept separate, but I didn't state that. Were this a formal debate, you would have won. Good on ye.scumofsociety said:There aren't any countries called Britain either. The British Empire came out of the British Isles, not the other way round.bobknowsall said:Ah, you see, that's a logical assertion that doesn't follow.
Europe has been around for ages, and England has quite happily been a part of Europe since it formed. And the last time I checked, the English proved very fond of Europe. Great deal of attempted (and some successful) conquests.
The "European Union" is a political construct. The continent's name inspired the organisation, not the other way around. But the whole "Europe-EU" thing is irrelevant, because it's got little to do with the actual problem.
The salient question is this: Are there any countries called Europe? Was there a "European Empire"? Is there any reason why being part of a continent is offensive? Because that's something I'd really like to see you elaborate on.