- Dec 30, 2010
I would have to disagree. There is evidence for it, but it is flimsy, distorted, and misunderstood. Either that or is something that is evidence for Evolution and warped and bent and molested to try and fit creationism.Sidremus said:I like the way you are trying to aproach such a, well hardly debated topic, OP.
But I think you did make two rather heavy mistakes in your original post, being:
- "no debate on if evolution is true or if god exist" srsly?! you cant just right it, and hope for the best... in a forum... in the internet....
-your also comparing apples with oranges. i mean, scientific research... on creation...
there is a reason that creationist deny so much of the scientific method, its because evoltion is based on science, creationism isnt. there is nothing scientific about creationism. there are NO real scientific evidence for creation to have happened. the bible sure is no evidence, its just a book.
all creationists do is, either bring up arguments of flaws in the theory of evolution or quote the bible. there is nothing providing evidence of creation to have happened.
And for a scientific research into the theory of creation, there had to be at least some evidence. there are none.
When you actually try to break it down if falls apart faster than a house of cards, in comparison to Evolution. While it is not perfect it is incredibly solid in comparison.