Poll: Fallout 3 or New Vegas

[Sizzle Montyjing]

NV is better is practically every way. Gameplay, characters, quests, plot, environment, DLC, arsenal, etc. The only thing F3 did better was the intro and the initial wow factor.

Completely wrong. Lest we forget... Three-Dog? F3 radio shat massively on F:NV, god, after a radio host that involved in the world in F3, it was kinda embarrassing to have a radio host that plain and boring, well, at least in my opinion.

OP: F3 is better if you're looking for a game set in the remains of an old world for the most part, whereas I'd say that F:NV feels a lot more like a game set in the early stages of a new world, at least the bits in the mojave are. [DLC pretty wicked-rad, y'know?]

So, I'm completely wrong, and to back up your claim, you present... a radio station? If it's the interaction that amazes you, don't forget Three dog only gave you a quest to repair a dish and gave you information about your dad. That was it.

Also, Fallout 3 takes place 36 years after Fallout 2. Fallout 1 was a wasteland with the beginnings of civilization. Likewise, Fallout 2 had made significant progress, with multiple large settlements. Then came Fallout 3 that, 116 years after the events of Fallout 1, was somehow less advanced than the people in Fallout 1.

I know this is a little late, I've been very busy doing fuck-all, after-all. Me saying you were completely wrong was sarcastic...kind of... surely only one exact thing could be right and everything else wrong, but this is all subjective anyway so whatever. But generally, I felt three dog was a lot more fun, and stroked my ego far better. Basically, I vastly preferred F:NV in every-way apart from the radio station [and i felt that F3 kinda did the post-apocalyptic feel a little better, maybe?].