Poll: Fallout 3 Review

Recommended Videos

Snuggle

New member
Apr 28, 2009
417
0
0
Fallout 3 Review
(There may be spoilers)​


Fallout 3 is, as the more vigilant reader may have noticed, the third game in the highly successful Fallout series. It was developed and published by Bethesda Softworks, creators of the Elder Scrolls series, most recently Oblivion, which I was not a fan of. It was developed for Xbox 360, Playstation 3 and PC. This review is based on the PC version. Fallout 3 was released in 2008.

When your father leaves the Vault where you were born and have spent all your life, hell breaks loose as the Overseer, the leader of the Vault, goes to extreme methods to prevent any other escapes. You manage to escape the Vault and you step into the sunlight for the first time. After the temporary loss of sight from the bright sunlight, you are greeted by the ravaged ruins of Washington DC, the Capital Wasteland. From here on you are pretty much free to do what you want. Will you try and find your father? Or will bring terror to the already suffering inhabitants of the Wasteland? The choice is yours.

Fallout 3 is different from the other games in the Fallout series, (None of which I have played) mainly in the sense that you now play from a first-person perspective, (There is also a third person view, but I never used it) and that the combat is now real-time instead of turn-based. Fallout 3 has, on gameplay terms, more in common with Oblivion than with the previous Fallout games. Fallout 3 has sometimes been dubbed ?Oblivion with guns?.
The combat is the same as in most FPS's, but you have the option of using the VATS system, which enables you to pick out a specific part of the enemy that you want to fire at. This, however, uses action-points, so use it carefully as the action-points take a little while to regenerate.
The weapons aren't very varied, but you'll find some use for all of them (i.e. some are very powerful, but you won't find much ammo for it, or some are good at long range, but lose their edge on short range.).
Like the other games Bethesda has made, Fallout 3 features a fast-travel in the map. This is a good thing, as the fun of exploring goes somewhat away when you have visited the place once.


The setting is simply fantastic and you'll want to keep exploring, as there is bound to something more out there. Life in the Wasteland is tough, and every time (Especially in the beginning) you find a safe-haven, you'll let out a sigh of relief. The game takes place 200 years after a nuclear war that has devastated the US and probably the world, and the way life in post-apocalyptic America is portrayed makes you feel genuinely sorry for all the beings you encounter in your travels.
The cities and settlements you encounter feel very unique, and they all have a very different history. This was one of the problems I had with Oblivion. The cities seemed very generic and there wasn't that feeling that this was a unique place. That there definitely is in Fallout 3, from Rivet City, which is actually an abandoned carrier ship, to Little Lamplight, where all the inhabitants are children.
One thing that I, unfortunately, encountered was invisible walls. Well, not exactly invisible walls, but place where there is some much debris, that apparently you can walk over it. This can be very annoying when you are traveling in central DC and you have to go long shortcuts just to get to place where you're supposed to be. This also takes focus away from the non-linearity of the game, but in the end it's just annoying.
The quests are generally very interesting with some interesting characters and locations, although one quest, Rielly's Rangers, was a drag. It was too long and nothing really happened except killing Super Mutants, and while that's fun enough, you can get tired of it.


The graphics of Fallout 3 are very good. The character animations are a bit samey though, I've encounter the same woman about 30 times, yet for some reason she has a different name. The scenery is amazing, although again it gets a bit samey, but then again, it works well to create the desolate feeling of the Wasteland. The colors are a mix of brown and brown, with a bit of yellow and gray. In other words, not the most colorful game, but it works. It adds perfectly to the mood of the game.
The sound of the weapons is quite good, no problems there. The soundtrack is amazing, from ?Civilization? to ?I Don't Want to Set the World On Fire? you'll be humming along.
The voice-acting is definitely an improvement from Oblivion, and Liam Neeson is very good in his role as the father. Still, you often encounter the same people in different locations (And by the same people, I don't mean the exact same people, but people that are basically clones of each other).


Fallout 3 is a game you don't want to miss out on, it has its flaws, but most can be overlooked. Whether it will appeal to a longtime fan of the old Fallout games, I can't say. But to a newcomer, this is a fantastic game.

Pros:

Fantastic setting
Great soundtrack
Unique cities
Engaging story
Fun exploration

Cons:

?Invisible? walls!
Generic voice-acting
A few boring quests
Samey character animations

Graphics: 8
Gameplay: 9
Sound: 8
Lasting Value: 9

Overall, Fallout 3 gets 9/10

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please give some feedback so I, hopefully, can improve.

EDIT: Now with centered pictures.
 

oliveira8

New member
Feb 2, 2009
4,726
0
0
I find that the voice acting(apart from the great Liam Neeson, but that happened with Oblivion to with Patrick Stewart and Sean Bean(Professional actors make a huuuuuuuuuge difference.)), is still equally bad compared to the rest of Bethesda games.

And Moriaty Lucky Charms accent doesnt help eiher.
 

scotth266

Wait when did I get a sub
Jan 10, 2009
5,201
0
0
Try using center with pictures, it is really useful. Other than that, some of your paragraphs were a bit short, which can make the review feel disjointed.

NUMBERS ARE BAD. It's better just to give a simple recommendation like "Try the demo" or "Buy it now" or "Avoid at all costs." This gives people a better impression of your opinions.

But I like the review. I wrote one as well, if you'd care to take a look.
 

oliveira8

New member
Feb 2, 2009
4,726
0
0
scotth266 said:
Try using center with pictures, it is really useful. Other than that, some of your paragraphs were a bit short, which can make the review feel disjointed.

NUMBERS ARE BAD. It's better just to give a simple recommendation like "Try the demo" or "Buy it now" or "Avoid at all costs." This gives people a better impression of your opinions.

But I like the review. I wrote one as well, if you'd care to take a look.
I have mixed feelings about numbers, if they pulled right it adds more to the review, but this is not the case and they feel tacked on.

I like the Pros and Cons system tho. More people should use them, gives a nice feeling of "wrap up" to it.
 

scotth266

Wait when did I get a sub
Jan 10, 2009
5,201
0
0
oliveira8 said:
I like the Pros and Cons system tho. More people should use them, gives a nice feeling of "wrap up" to it.
I like pros and cons, but they tend to be a bit listy, so I skip on them. Personal preference.
 

Snuggle

New member
Apr 28, 2009
417
0
0
scotth266 said:
Try using center with pictures, it is really useful. Other than that, some of your paragraphs were a bit short, which can make the review feel disjointed.

NUMBERS ARE BAD. It's better just to give a simple recommendation like "Try the demo" or "Buy it now" or "Avoid at all costs." This gives people a better impression of your opinions.

But I like the review. I wrote one as well, if you'd care to take a look.
Thank you. I think I'll skip the numbers for my next review then. Also, how do you center the pictures?
 

scotth266

Wait when did I get a sub
Jan 10, 2009
5,201
0
0
Snuggle said:
Thank you. I think I'll skip the numbers for my next review then. Also, how do you center the pictures?
Quote this, then you'll see. Works with images!​
 

oliveira8

New member
Feb 2, 2009
4,726
0
0
scotth266 said:
oliveira8 said:
I like the Pros and Cons system tho. More people should use them, gives a nice feeling of "wrap up" to it.
I like pros and cons, but they tend to be a bit listy, so I skip on them. Personal preference.
In this case it comes in the end and recaps the reviewer thoughts.

Also to note Fallout 3 and Oblivion are the only Bethesda games to feature Fast Travel.

There wasnt fast travel in Arena/Daggerfall/Morrowind, but there was a transportation system in which you payed and you travelled to the nearby town.

Fallout 3 and Oblivion got alot of flak for featuring Fast Travel from old time Bethesda fans and hardcore RPG players cause it caters to more mainstream players(or so its told).
 

scotth266

Wait when did I get a sub
Jan 10, 2009
5,201
0
0
oliveira8 said:
In this case it comes in the end and recaps the reviewer thoughts.

Fallout 3 and Oblivion got alot of flak for featuring Fast Travel from old time Bethesda fans and hardcore RPG players cause it caters to more mainstream players(or so its told).
It fits his style, just not mine. I tend to have a short conclusory paragraph anywho that sums up my thoughts.

Why the hate on the Fast Travel? All it does is shorten the amount of time it takes to perform a task you were gonna do 1,000,000 times anyway. Then again, Oblivion had you be able to go to the other end of the map at the start of the game... I wanted to explore to get there. Another reason why FO3 > Oblivion for me I suppose.
 

oliveira8

New member
Feb 2, 2009
4,726
0
0
scotth266 said:
oliveira8 said:
In this case it comes in the end and recaps the reviewer thoughts.

Fallout 3 and Oblivion got alot of flak for featuring Fast Travel from old time Bethesda fans and hardcore RPG players cause it caters to more mainstream players(or so its told).
It fits his style, just not mine. I tend to have a short conclusory paragraph anywho that sums up my thoughts.

Why the hate on the Fast Travel? All it does is shorten the amount of time it takes to perform a task you were gonna do 1,000,000 times anyway. Then again, Oblivion had you be able to go to the other end of the map at the start of the game... I wanted to explore to get there. Another reason why FO3 > Oblivion for me I suppose.
Hence the hate. Lots of people like to get imersed in the game and explore the florest and stuff, but fast travel removes that.

I think I use fast travel only one time per game in Oblivion..and that is for teh stupid escort quest from Kvatch to Prior...the damn dude doesnt have a bloody horse to keep up!! urg!
 

Sparrow

New member
Feb 22, 2009
6,848
0
0
"Generic" voice acting?

OMFG. Don't diss Liam or I'll come round your house and make you watch Star Wars 1 fifty times.

I rather did love the game though.
 

Snuggle

New member
Apr 28, 2009
417
0
0
I actually wrote "The voice-acting is definitely an improvement from Oblivion, and Liam Neeson is very good in his role as the father. Still, you often encounter the same people in different locations (And by the same people, I don't mean the exact same people, but people that are basically clones of each other)."

So apart from Liam the voice acting generic.
 

ryai458

New member
Oct 20, 2008
1,493
0
0
great game not so great review but i assume this is your first so keep working and they could be good
 

balimuzz

New member
Apr 15, 2009
596
0
0
Not so great, but good, and if this is your first review, keep at it! This shows promise. You felt a little bit like a telegraph at certain points, with your sentences stopping and starting, and overall, the writing mechanics could be improved. Still, the overall gist of the review got across quite well, and I think that you should keep at it.
oliveira8 said:
scotth266 said:
Try using center with pictures, it is really useful. Other than that, some of your paragraphs were a bit short, which can make the review feel disjointed.

NUMBERS ARE BAD. It's better just to give a simple recommendation like "Try the demo" or "Buy it now" or "Avoid at all costs." This gives people a better impression of your opinions.

But I like the review. I wrote one as well, if you'd care to take a look.
I have mixed feelings about numbers, if they pulled right it adds more to the review, but this is not the case and they feel tacked on.

I like the Pros and Cons system tho. More people should use them, gives a nice feeling of "wrap up" to it.
I agree with both of these statements as well. The pros/cons thing was great, but the numbers are dumb. Just give your overall verdict (Good/Bad or Buy/Rent/Ignore/Burn).
 

RebelRising

New member
Jan 5, 2008
2,230
0
0
Good review; a bit on the factual side, and, like some others have said, number-based scoring tends to marginalize the weight of the purchasing decision. Aside from that, it was concise and some relatable observations. Thumbs up.
 

Clashero

New member
Aug 15, 2008
2,143
0
0
oliveira8 said:
scotth266 said:
Try using center with pictures, it is really useful. Other than that, some of your paragraphs were a bit short, which can make the review feel disjointed.

NUMBERS ARE BAD. It's better just to give a simple recommendation like "Try the demo" or "Buy it now" or "Avoid at all costs." This gives people a better impression of your opinions.

But I like the review. I wrote one as well, if you'd care to take a look.
I have mixed feelings about numbers, if they pulled right it adds more to the review, but this is not the case and they feel tacked on.

I like the Pros and Cons system tho. More people should use them, gives a nice feeling of "wrap up" to it.
Ditto on the pros and cons. I also like Gamespot's merit system, where they have these little badges for things that a game stand out for, like "Great Sound Design", "Pulls You In", "Great Dialogue", "Great Art Direction". There also some negative badges like "Been There, Done That", which every Madden game gets, invariably.
 

scotth266

Wait when did I get a sub
Jan 10, 2009
5,201
0
0
Hmmm. It seems as if you've been trolled a bit with your poll, as the only people who criticized you said that you still did good for your first job. That's a real shame.

That reminds me: some of the people in the game have the same voices as the guards from Oblivion. It gave me game shock: I thought I was about to be arrested :D

Clashero said:
Ditto on the pros and cons. I also like Gamespot's merit system, where they have these little badges for things that a game stand out for, like "Great Sound Design", "Pulls You In", "Great Dialogue", "Great Art Direction". There also some negative badges like "Been There, Done That", which every Madden game gets, invariably.
Oooh, I like those too. They serve as a nice summation of stuff.
 

StuRob

New member
Apr 27, 2009
1
0
0
At first, I absolutely adored this game just because I tend to love any game that gives me a large, open space to explore. Then the rot started to set in, what with VATS and the fact that the first-person combat just doesn't feel right.

Other little things like the way you can hit level 20 in no time at all and the massively stupid ending just added insult to injury .... no, good effort, I guess, but just another massive disappointment in the gaming calendar along with Far Cry 2 and STALKER:Clear Sky.