Poll: Fallout1 or Fallout2

Recommended Videos

if_then_else

New member
Apr 28, 2005
66
0
0
Fallout 2.

I think is the better one. It has all elements the first one has and it adds some polish like better inventory management (although it still sucks), better companions management, better quest log, a bit more content. Plus it has my favorite weapon: the Gauss Rifle.

I like the way the story unfolds in Fallout 2, it's not lineal but I find it easier to follow and to understand what's happening. Fallout 1 fells a bit more free-roaming, which I understand some people prefer, but I just like games that guide you a bit more. Also, I don't like the time limit in Fallout 1 (I know you can "buy" more time, but still).

I played Fallout 2 several times, but I played the first one only once.
 

ultrabiome

New member
Sep 14, 2011
460
0
0
fallout 1. i liked the story and the premise of the vault dweller in the post apocalypse.

i didn't like fallout 2 all that much. maybe because i didn't mod it to not be broken, or that i had to play the factions against each other and i wasn't into that. maybe i didn't like the origin story as much. maybe i liked exploring more than building a new civ from the ashes.

i guess for the same reasons i like fallout 3 to NV (although admittedly i haven't played NV).
 

Indecipherable

Senior Member
Mar 21, 2010
590
0
21
ultrabiome said:
i guess for the same reasons i like fallout 3 to NV (although admittedly i haven't played NV).
It's so great to have an opinion to mouth off and tell everyone about when you admit in your own post that you are clueless. Keep at it!
 

Canadamus Prime

Robot in Disguise
Jun 17, 2009
14,331
0
0
Start with Fallout (the first one), and then play 2. That's what I'd suggest. Although personally I found 2 to be more than a little frustrating esp. at the start.
 

ultrabiome

New member
Sep 14, 2011
460
0
0
Indecipherable said:
ultrabiome said:
i guess for the same reasons i like fallout 3 to NV (although admittedly i haven't played NV).
It's so great to have an opinion to mouth off and tell everyone about when you admit in your own post that you are clueless. Keep at it!
i would have to say it was informed opinion due to doing enough research on the game to know what the core story and gameplay revolves around and after playing 1 and 2, knowing which i preferred. opinionated yes. clueless no. fallout 1 is still better.
 

keiji_Maeda

New member
May 9, 2012
283
0
0
Silver said:
keiji_Maeda said:
THat in a ´nutshell is one of the biggest point of critique against F1 it's more difficult to play a Social/INT char, which is (according to one of the devs) the idea, they wanted to clear out the gene-pol in the vault so the big/dum person got sent out, according to one version anyway ^^
But in the second one if you fail at one dialogue in the beginning and you don't have good combat skills you're automatically dead. In the first one all you have to do is clear out some rats, and then you're good, at least for a while.

In the second my easiest playthrough was as a social characater though, with maxed out science. That was pretty cool.


I'd get the first one. It's the first in the series, the second one has a lot of references to it, you'll meet characters from the first, you'll see places from the first changed and you won't get as much of an introduction to the world. And your character in the second one makes a lot less sense. (I'd get the second one too, and play through that several times as well, and then I'd get Fallout Tactics despite it being slightly worse, but still fun (if in another genre of game), and then I'd reluctantly play the third one and Obsidians game, and be sad and miss the real Fallout games, because sure, they're not entirely horrible, but it's just not Fallout).

Good point, there is a sense of accomplishment in seeing certain towns, people and events growing and being firmly entrenched in canon. But i think the second game fares a lot better on it's own, partially because of the structuring but also because of the (then definetly, now FIRMLY) entrenched pop-culture references, even the simple Dune taunt that took me a couple of years to "Get", there's more of it, and while more is not definetly better. In this case it works very well IMO.
 

Silver

New member
Jun 17, 2008
1,142
0
0
I liked that the first one took itself more seriously though (she says about the game where you can aliens with a picture of Elvis). The pop-culture references, and the jokes were either very clearly not part of the main game, or just worked out smoother, and more of the game kept a straight face. Sure, many of the encounters are hilarious (time travelling back to the first game anyone?), but you lose some of the immersion.

Also many of the most emotional encounters lose some weight when you haven't played the first one (investigating Vault city closely for example), and the beginning makes no sense.