Ben Yahtzee Star-Gate Croshaw?slightly evil said:I'd go for Orcs, elves etc. but the chosen one thing gets to me above all the others. to paraphrase the great B.Y.S.G. Croshaw, there shouldn't be a 'standard fantasy setting'
and a small point, but fantasy and scifi are pretty much the same thing. (I prefer science to magic, or better yet, both)
I have the exact opposite opinion from you.rockyoumonkeys said:Honestly, I have no problem with any of those cliches. What bores me in fantasy is when it tries to be too "realistic". When there are large-scale battles and armies and political maneuvering. When things like magic and monsters are toned down or eliminated entirely and replaced with gritty battle-hardened men going to war. Those things don't interest me at all.
dont forget the elves....those oh so supior elves who are totally awsome and better than human scumRatRace123 said:The "Humans are dicks" stereotype.
Present in all forms of fiction that feature multiple sentient races.
I get that we can be assholessometimesmost of the times, but I'd like to think that in an entire country, there would be some decent humans outside of the protagonists.
yeah Ive always thourght it would be interesting to have a story basically middle earth in moddern dayChrinik said:A named doom? Hm, how about Sauron, how´s that for a name?Grouchy Imp said:The worst stereotypes (coincidentally Tolkien inspired) are the axe wielding dwarf and the longbow wielding elf. Oh, and the human scion who uncovers his destiny.
Other stereotypes include the eccentic, possibly senile wizard and of course the unnamed doom looming over the land. What is it with unnamed doom? Can't we have named doom for a change?
EDIT - Buttered toast.
To be clear on the Fantasy thing, I voted all of the above, simply for a fact that THESE elements MAKE UP fantasy, so excluding any of it will not make people recognize it as a fantasy story...
But to be fair, Orcs, Elves, Dwarfs and co, Magic and or "medival" setting, make the most appearance.
Hey, how about a fantasy story, which is set not in a fictional 11th century, but in a fictional 21st...I mean, common! Elven snipers, Orcs wielding RPGs and MGs, Dwarfen shock troopers...that would be AWESOME.
If it has been done, and it is any good, please point me in the direction, thanks.
Benjamin Yahtzee Sebastian Godzilla CroshawTheIronRuler said:Ben Yahtzee Star-Gate Croshaw?slightly evil said:I'd go for Orcs, elves etc. but the chosen one thing gets to me above all the others. to paraphrase the great B.Y.S.G. Croshaw, there shouldn't be a 'standard fantasy setting'
and a small point, but fantasy and scifi are pretty much the same thing. (I prefer science to magic, or better yet, both)
i deem this the only question i shall answer for now, with Jam and vegemite, the toast of the (slightly insane) Gods!TheIronRuler said:And lastly, Do you spread Jam, Butter or Chocolate on your bread or toast? (six options are available therefore I couldn't fit that in my poll).
I think there is another reason why many put Tolkenian races in their fantasy story. (Though for many of them laziness is the reason.)BobDobolina said:Tolkienesque "races" are a drag and proof positive of laziness. I give props to the occasional authors who at least make the minimal effort of disguising their elves, dwarves, hobbits, orcs and trolls with different names or surface appearances -- most can't even be bothered to do that -- but it's still not hard to identify them. (Plagiarized Tolkienesque or D&D monsters are a related cliches; any use of "wight" to denote "monster," for instance.)
Like the fundemental law in FMA, the alchemy.loc978 said:My biggest fantasy pet peeve in fantasy isn't up there...
Powerful, abundant, convenient magic with no drawbacks that can easily replace all conventional technology... yet doesn't replace any of it. If there must be magic, I say write it the way George R. R. Martin does in A Song of Ice and Fire. Smallish effects that come at an incredibly high price to the caster.