Poll: Fast zombies.

brighteye

New member
Feb 5, 2009
185
0
0
farmerboy219 said:
i think it makes sense, if the rest of the body (except brain) works fine why should they be able to run.



Fniff said:
Starting in 28 days later,
strictly speaking 28 days later weren't normally zombies, they didn't die then rise they stayed living and arent really zombies
Well, they were "infected" but to all means and purposes they were "zombies".
Just look at Left 4 Dead to get my point.

BTW, fast zombies is way scarier, there were always a portion of sillyness when you are chased by an enemy that ...shuffles forward.
 

Zand88

New member
Jan 21, 2009
431
0
0
Fast zombies are the natural evolution that the genre needs.

Now, "infected", non-cannibal, non-undead zombies are the problem, and the ones I really hate.
 

Twilightruler

New member
Jul 3, 2009
167
0
0
Ok well here's the issue. In movies with fast zombies like 28 days later, they weren't actually zombies, they didn't die then come back. It's kind of like left 4 dead in that it was an infection, kind of like super rabies, that's why the people are like that. So yes, slow zombies make more sense in a ZOMBIE movie. However fast "zombies" make more sense in a movie about an infection. Personally I prefer fast ones, although easier to kill, they just really scare people since slow zombies would really not even be remotely difficult to avoid in a real life scenario.
 

mkg

New member
Feb 24, 2009
315
0
0
From a strictly scientific point of view it makes no sense, if your skin is rotting, why is there no additional muscle degradation? But yea, it definitly makes for more tension filled movies.
 

albear

New member
May 18, 2009
242
0
0
farmerboy219 said:
i think it makes sense, if the rest of the body (except brain) works fine why should they be able to run.



Fniff said:
Starting in 28 days later,
strictly speaking 28 days later weren't normally zombies, they didn't die then rise they stayed living and arent really zombies
thank you :D
 

Cowabungaa

New member
Feb 10, 2008
10,806
0
0
In a game, no because they're at least a slight challenge to kill. In real life I would rather have an enemy I can just casually stroll away from.
 

teisjm

New member
Mar 3, 2009
3,561
0
0
I don't hate em.

"Zombie" covers a kinda large group of enemies nowdays.

The most common of them beeing the slow limbing re-animated corpse, but other stuff such as fast zombies, infected zombies (which isn't re-animated corpses, but infected living people) cursed zombies (like infected) and all sorts of other zombies.

I'm not gonna get angry because someone is using the Z word about other stuff then my favourite kind of zombie.
 

L4hlborg

New member
Jul 11, 2009
1,050
0
0
Depends.

In movies, Dawn of the Dead remake worked really well with fast zombies. Slow zombies work well too, so it's more a matter of the guys making the movie than the type of zombies.

In video games, fast zombies actually work better, because otherwise you could probably just run away from the zombies. I like L4D and it's one of my favorite games, because on harder difficulties, you can fear the zombies purely because of their attack power and speed, not being ridiculously overhealthed or overpowered with weapons.

If the zombie apocalypse would come right now, I would hate fast zombies because.... THEY ARE FAST. They could catch up with me and freakin kill me. So irl, I would prefer slower zombies.
 

MortisLegio

New member
Nov 5, 2008
1,258
0
0
No because one unaimed shotgun blast kills about 8 of them while slow ones pretty much can only be killed by a well aimed headshot
 

Heliros

New member
May 30, 2008
44
0
0
I won't lie. I hate them with a passion.
Nothing I will say here hasn't probably been said before in the thread, but I'll reinforce those statements nonetheless.

Slow moving zombies. They are creepy, resilient and they WILL get you. That's the whole point of them, and the horrific, terrible truth of it. You can build a supreme fortress of admantinium alloys and have a solar powered super granary that sprouts food forever. It won't matter. Eventually, one of them will come shambling about, spot your little piece of heaven, open it's mouth and moan. If you don't dispose of it, more will come. And more. And more. Eventually, when you realise that they're a problem, there will be enough for them to climb over the corpses of their 'fellows', and get over your indestructible wall.
Even if you DO manage to stay quiet and kill all stragglers, would you be able to live on in a world where zombies are a constant, never ending threat? Every new corpse needs to be burned. You will always be watching over your shoulder. And make note, no man is perfect. You WILL mess up, eventually. Maybe not now, maybe not in five, ten years. But mess up you will, and they will get you.
That's why I love them. So inescapable. As someone said earlier, very chutulu-esque. The fear of death, and the fear of finality.

The new running zombies however. Yes, they make me crap my pants, but they are a very in-your-face kind of monster. They run up and scare you, but, also as stated before, they are generally weak as fuck. Poke them with a stick and they transform into a pile of gore. They have no lasting threat to them. Get a big enough army, or enough firepower and entrenchment, and you're all set. They are a problem you can overcome, and I won't have zombies that can be defeated once and for all. They are not scary over time. Sure, it might not matter, they might get everyone in the first wave and leave the planet humanless, but then what? They will deteriorate and dissipate, and life will eventually return.

That's my view of it.
 

Kinguendo

New member
Apr 10, 2009
4,267
0
0
Cos' it f*cks up the plan! :D

But seriously though I guess they would be able to run for a short period after their death and then undeath, until the rigimortis sets in... then they would find it hard to move let alone move fast.
 

Me55enger

New member
Dec 16, 2008
1,095
0
0
Think about it this way:

Would Left 4 Dead be as fun/challenging/scary if the zombies/rabies infected humans had a maximum speed equal to an athsmatic sloth?

Its merely an evolution in the concept of the undead.
 

destroyer383

New member
Mar 23, 2009
83
0
0
Evil Jak said:
Cos' it f*cks up the plan! :D

But seriously though I guess they would be able to run for a short period after their death and then undeath, until the rigimortis sets in... then they would find it hard to move let alone move fast.
exactly that :D
 

Akai Shizuku

New member
Jul 24, 2009
3,183
0
0
Fast zombies are unrealistic in fiction due to necrosis damaging the muscles too much for them to run. HOWEVER. Scientifically speaking, both types of zombies are a very real possibility. See link, and prepare a second pair of pants.

http://www.cracked.com/article_15643_5-scientific-reasons-zombie-apocalypse-could-actually-happen.html

This is absolutely terrifying, I thought I should mention that. Zombies (in both fast and slow forms) are, as I've said above, a very real possibility. I personally dislike the fast zombies. I don't consider them zombies because they're not really undead, for one. Two, they're a lot easier to kill because you don't necessarily need a headshot. Three, well...I just like the Romero rules, okay? Read the Zombie Survival guide.
 

thebrainiac1

New member
Jul 11, 2009
150
0
0
In games = good challenge, fast-paced gaming.
In films = good action sequences.
In life = Don't care, I'm locked up in the saferoom I had installed in the basement L4D style.(with food)