No. Nothing ever will.Daystar Clarion said:Especially since Braid wasn't very artistic to begin with.remnant_phoenix said:I agree. If someone believes that Braid is the only truly artistic video game, they have a very narrow-minded approach to artfulness.Hero in a half shell said:It just frustrates me that they completely disregard all other games as art because they are primarily designed to be fun, or to turn a profit, that doesn't stop them also having meaningful themes that can be explored, or deeper messages about philosophical subjects.
Oh Journey, will anything ever beat you?
ever
OT: Don't suppose someone can give me the cliff notes? I got as far as: "?It just drives home how fictional money is,? Blow said, squinting against the unseasonably bright December sun." and then stopped because I thought I'd be reading a generalising and insulting article. Not a generalising and insulting attempt at a shitty biography.
I'm guessing it's just Blow tooting his own horn again yeah? Fuck sake....Braid was bloody mediocre at best.
EDIT: Skimmed over the first page, got to the Tai-Chi bit. Is it just me or does the writer of the article seem to have a creepily high level of hero worship-or something along those lines-for Mr. Blow?
EDIT the second: Start of the second page...slagging off Skyrim? Really? I didn't think if was possible for me to take this tripe any less seriously.
(I'll stop making new entries whenever something in that article pisses me off. Otherwise I'll be here all bloody night ^_^)
EDIT 3 (Couldn't help myself): Braid is a more apt example of an artistic game than Flower? Bullshit of the highest degree right there!