They and them are perfectly fine as singular pronouns, people use them correctly all the time in the singular when they don't know a person's physical sex. For some reason this only becomes an issue when a person's physical sex is discovered when physical sex is conflicting to gender identity. Their, them, themselves, and they are all correct in singular use as gender neutral pronouns.F-I-D-O said:My only issue with the They/They're "pronouns" is plurals.
I don't like saying "They are doing xyz" if it's one person.
And "They is doing xyz" just feels dirty in a purely grammatical manner. At least the various Xim/Xir type wording works with normal sentence structure. If someone wants the They pronoun family, I'll just try extra hard to remember their name to make everyone happier.
MarsAtlas said:Did everybody except me miss the class in second grade where we all learned about pronouns and that they is indeed a pronoun that can be used to describe a singlular noun?
I think this is an excellent method. Serves you well in most situations.crimson5pheonix said:If you use the wrong pronoun, apologize and move on. If they're so offended that they can't accept an apology, they're not worth dealing with.
Well then it seems you ran into a person who just happens to be a total areshole. Trans folk, both binary and non-binary, like every other group of humans are not immune from being aresholes. If they're going out of their way to harass you, then they obviously have issues deeper than just the fact that you misgendered them. Some people do use being trans as a shield for having aPolitrukk said:"They" made it clear "they" wished to further the interaction, would not leave me alone afterwards, would not stand for it untill the entire world knew I misgendered "them" going as far as to carry the conversation to and stalk my twitter for it whilst citing every tweet in the thereafter twitter part of the conversation with a cry for help or outrage and referring to me in manners of disrespect themselves.
(The only thing that bothers me about they/them is that it also implies plural Xhe/hir was it? those may look a bit strange but I can totally get behind, but that wasn't what put me off it was this persons reaction.)
So yeah it started from a normal conversation with a person I barely knew and turned into a barrage of online hate.
The problem with using "it" for any non-binary person is because "it" is used as a dehumanizing slur, generally by people who also call trans folk "freaks", "tranny", "trannies", "perverts" and insinuate mental illness. Mostly because transphobes like to describe trans men and especially trans women as "it", using the word "it" as a means of exclusion and dehumanization. We're not going to change the attitude on the word "it" used in the context of referring to a trans person, just like how we're never going to change the attitudes towards the word "******".Creator002 said:EDIT - Oh, you all realise English DOES have a singular gender-neutral pronoun, don't you ("it")? However its use to refer to a person is generally considered offensive and towards a non-binary/trans/whatever person, it'd be even more offensive. I don't see why we can't change that attitude towards "it" though.
Could not have asked for a better opportunity. Here:Creator002 said:EDIT - Oh, you all realise English DOES have a singular gender-neutral pronoun, don't you ("it")?
I know. I said that, but in not as many words nor with further clarification. Didn't think I had to.KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime said:The problem with using "it" for any non-binary person is because "it" is used as a dehumanizing slur, generally by people who also call trans folk "freaks", "tranny", "trannies", "perverts" and insinuate mental illness. Mostly because transphobes like to describe trans men and especially trans women as "it", using the word "it" as a means of exclusion and dehumanization.Creator002 said:EDIT - Oh, you all realise English DOES have a singular gender-neutral pronoun, don't you ("it")? However its use to refer to a person is generally considered offensive and towards a non-binary/trans/whatever person, it'd be even more offensive. I don't see why we can't change that attitude towards "it" though.
Well, I guess we shouldn't even try then.We're not going to change the attitude on the word "it" used in the context of referring to a trans person, just like how we're never going to change the attitudes towards the word "******".
What? It may be because I already call babies "it," but beyond it being an offensive term to a human (which I said), I don't get what you're saying.DoPo said:snip
Being that I'm trans and generally pass, I only get misgendered by people who know I'm trans, when it's a stranger it's because I was outed. Generally strangers who misgender me because I was outed, do so as a method of refusing my gender identity, as a means of insulting me for having the sheer gall to be myself. When someone starts using misgendering as a weapon it is most certainly not the problem of person being harassed, it's the problem of the person doing the harassing.GalanDun said:Someone wants to be known as non-binary? No thanks, I'm not putting up with that.
Misgendering is an irritation, but in the end, that's that persons problem. I'm a man, I've been a man my whole life, and some people used to think I was a girl because of my long hair, and that bugged the crap out of me when I was a kid. Then I hit puberty and nobody mistook me for a girl again. Sometimes people need to be corrected, other times the person correcting them is being stupid. The latter is usually true when people start using made-up words and insisting you do the same in order to not offend them.
Well apparently I had an issue gleaning that from your post, so the clarification there might help others.Creator002 said:I know. I said that, but in not as many words nor with further clarification. Didn't think I had to.KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime said:The problem with using "it" for any non-binary person is because "it" is used as a dehumanizing slur, generally by people who also call trans folk "freaks", "tranny", "trannies", "perverts" and insinuate mental illness. Mostly because transphobes like to describe trans men and especially trans women as "it", using the word "it" as a means of exclusion and dehumanization.Creator002 said:EDIT - Oh, you all realise English DOES have a singular gender-neutral pronoun, don't you ("it")? However its use to refer to a person is generally considered offensive and towards a non-binary/trans/whatever person, it'd be even more offensive. I don't see why we can't change that attitude towards "it" though.
That's possibly a valid solution, because trying to change attitudes to a word that's universally hated in a some contexts, or sometimes all contexts... That's not gonna please most people, nor will they appreciate your stance.Creator002 said:Well, I guess we shouldn't even try then.KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime said:We're not going to change the attitude on the word "it" used in the context of referring to a trans person, just like how we're never going to change the attitudes towards the word "******".
My issue is that I structure sentences about singular people with "is." It's a habit. I can say "she is doing x." But if I focus on using the right pronount, I'm so happy that I use "They" instead of she I forget the following "...is doing x." So I say "They is doing x." Notice I never said that "They" can't be used as a singular pronoun.KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime said:They and them are perfectly fine as singular pronouns, people use them correctly all the time in the singular when they don't know a person's physical sex. For some reason this only becomes an issue when a person's physical sex is discovered when physical sex is conflicting to gender identity. Their, them, themselves, and they are all correct in singular use as gender neutral pronouns.F-I-D-O said:My only issue with the They/They're "pronouns" is plurals.
I don't like saying "They are doing xyz" if it's one person.
And "They is doing xyz" just feels dirty in a purely grammatical manner. At least the various Xim/Xir type wording works with normal sentence structure. If someone wants the They pronoun family, I'll just try extra hard to remember their name to make everyone happier.
Quote because of relevance and because this really is grade school grammar:
Well I must have misread the previous post, being I thought you were specifically saying that it was entirely bad grammar.F-I-D-O said:My issue is that I structure sentences about singular people with "is." It's a habit. I can say "she is doing x." But if I focus on using the right pronount, I'm so happy that I use "They" instead of she I forget the following "...is doing x." So I say "They is doing x." Notice I never said that "They" can't be used as a singular pronoun.
I said I don't comfortably use them due to my habits of dialogue. The example sentence "felt" strange to say.
"They" also feels impersonal to me, and I don't use it when referring to singular people unless they specifically ask.
In addition, I never liked the vagueness of "they". In writing, it's irritating because it's unclear and requires extra context to clarify. In speech it works better because of dialogue context, but again, it feels impersonal to me, and missing a sentence in the conversation causes issues. For the same reasons, I don't describe people as "it." When I think "they" I think two+ people. For my usage, it's 99% a plural pronoun (which is the primary usage). As a gender neutral pronoun, I felt it was a cop out to use the "just vague enough" plural pronoun as a single pronoun. Using "They" for singular organizations make more sense because those inherently represent a group of people.
The topic was about how we feel about various pronouns/naming conventions and using "They" for any individual, regardless of identity, doesn't make sense to me. Something in my head doesn't connect when a person says "refer to me as they/them/etc," leading to wonderful crimes against spoken language. As someone who already had issues speaking, I learn names instead.
If they ask you to address them a certain way, and you don't, then you're just being rude. It's like if I decided to arbitrarily start calling you "Kelly" if your name was "Joseph".Politrukk said:Let alone accept that I should be shamed and hated for reffering to them as a "she".
Well, no, you generally can't tell that someone is non-binary just by looking at them. It's common to make a mistake if you define gender only by looking at their clothes and body shape. If you make a mistake and the person corrects you, you apologize briefly and continue referring to them in a correct way. That's literally it. I have never seen someone lose their mind over an honest mistake or an accidental slip.Politrukk said:I find it difficult to understand how I should find out that someone who has the physical aspects and aesthetic of a female (Breasts,bodily shape,wears makeup,dresses feminine)
Is gender fluid/non-binary.
I wait until I see them and decide whichever pronoun comes most naturally to my mind, and I don't worry about how common english parlance is going to make them crack and fall to pieces like sugar glass.MarsAtlas said:So do you wait until you see somebody's genitals before you refer to them with any particular sort of pronouns?MHR said:Whenever I'm speaking in pronouns, I'm concerned about the sex, not your arbitrarily redefined gender.
*shrug* Just saw an opportunity to quote Jerome K. Jerome and I took it. I'd take any but there is seldom a chance.Creator002 said:What? It may be because I already call babies "it," but beyond it being an offensive term to a human (which I said), I don't get what you're saying.