well, considering how often people die to prove they have a better imaginary friend then everyone else, no not really.xmetatr0nx said:Ok thats a bit much dont you think?Lullabye said:be part of the cause of another war or something
What faith in humanity...Lullabye said:well, considering how often people die to prove they have a better imaginary friend then everyone else, no not really.xmetatr0nx said:Ok thats a bit much dont you think?Lullabye said:be part of the cause of another war or something
Not really as there are companies out there who will go to extremes to protect of enforce their genetic licenses. For example Monsanto, who genetically modified a type of Canola seed started to ruin farmers in Canada and the US because Monsanto fields would be planted next to non Monsanto fields and the crops would cross pollinate. The superior Monsanto crop would take over and then the farmer would have to either pay restitution to Monsanto, or burn his crop and his seeds as they were now altered with the genes that Monsanto patented. The courts backed Monsanto on this one.xmetatr0nx said:Ok thats a bit much dont you think?Lullabye said:be part of the cause of another war or something
faith is the problem in this case. Honestly you should read my post before you reply. I think if we learn from our past mistakes then we have an honest shot at becoming artificially superior beings. But we are in the middle of an economic crisis, america is involved in at least 2 major wars, and then there is the stupid swine flu that everybody is hyperventalating over. So, forgive me for having no faith. Oh right, and how many world wars have we had in the last century? 2? really? good for you humanity. now try NOT being retarded and see how that works.sirdanrhodes said:What faith in humanity...Lullabye said:well, considering how often people die to prove they have a better imaginary friend then everyone else, no not really.xmetatr0nx said:Ok thats a bit much dont you think?Lullabye said:be part of the cause of another war or something
i mean not like "set 2 different kinds of dog and let them breath"Lullabye said:Many of you would be suprised at how much is already being genetically altered.
think bread.
canada is ready, we have guns now.xmetatr0nx said:My god youre right, the US should totaly attack canada...Torian_Kel said:Not really as there are companies out there who will go to extremes to protect of enforce their genetic licenses. For example Monsanto, who genetically modified a type of Canola seed started to ruin farmers in Canada and the US because Monsanto fields would be planted next to non Monsanto fields and the crops would cross pollinate. The superior Monsanto crop would take over and then the farmer would have to either pay restitution to Monsanto, or burn his crop and his seeds as they were now altered with the genes that Monsanto patented. The courts backed Monsanto on this one.xmetatr0nx said:Ok thats a bit much dont you think?Lullabye said:be part of the cause of another war or something
So what happens when a genetically altered species of something cross breeds or cross pollinates with something of another nation and wipes out that nation's ability to produce said species? It would not be good I can promise you that.
Otherwise, I am for genetic manipulation as long as it does not infringe on the rights of others.
So a lawsuit equals war here? Look no wars will be started over GMOs, lawsuits yes not wars. There are more trivial things that get people wanting to kill like jesus.
uh, yeah, thats what i meant to.......uh...why did you quote that part of my rant? like two pieces of bread are gonna get it on?massau said:i mean not like "set 2 different kinds of dog and let them breath"Lullabye said:Many of you would be suprised at how much is already being genetically altered.
think bread.
i mean "lets change the DNA of a mouse so he will glow in the dark"
maybe we can become all super smart and evolve even faster but i know there is no good without evilNeoDeath90 said:Think yin and yang. You cannot have one without the other, there can be no good without evil and all that. sure, we could increase the size of food and put a slow on world hunger, or we can give immunities to animals, but there will always be some one who wants to test on humans.
Genetic mutations in humans can certainly bring about another sort of conflict, and eventually we'd end up with oversized veggies and untainted animals, but we'd also end up with a bunch of failed experiments and insane humans.
Messing with genetics is fine in my book, but like everything else, in moderation.
I was not insinuating that the US should attack Canada or that Lawsuits equal wars.xmetatr0nx said:My god youre right, the US should totaly attack canada...Torian_Kel said:Not really as there are companies out there who will go to extremes to protect of enforce their genetic licenses. For example Monsanto, who genetically modified a type of Canola seed started to ruin farmers in Canada and the US because Monsanto fields would be planted next to non Monsanto fields and the crops would cross pollinate. The superior Monsanto crop would take over and then the farmer would have to either pay restitution to Monsanto, or burn his crop and his seeds as they were now altered with the genes that Monsanto patented. The courts backed Monsanto on this one.xmetatr0nx said:Ok thats a bit much dont you think?Lullabye said:be part of the cause of another war or something
So what happens when a genetically altered species of something cross breeds or cross pollinates with something of another nation and wipes out that nation's ability to produce said species? It would not be good I can promise you that.
Otherwise, I am for genetic manipulation as long as it does not infringe on the rights of others.
So a lawsuit equals war here? Look no wars will be started over GMOs, lawsuits yes not wars. There are more trivial things that get people wanting to kill like jesus.
Allah ackbar boom!sirdanrhodes said:What faith in humanity...Lullabye said:well, considering how often people die to prove they have a better imaginary friend then everyone else, no not really.xmetatr0nx said:Ok thats a bit much dont you think?Lullabye said:be part of the cause of another war or something
how come when i said that i got rebuted? at least we have a few realists here.Torian_Kel said:I was not insinuating that the US should attack Canada or that Lawsuits equal wars.xmetatr0nx said:My god youre right, the US should totaly attack canada...Torian_Kel said:Not really as there are companies out there who will go to extremes to protect of enforce their genetic licenses. For example Monsanto, who genetically modified a type of Canola seed started to ruin farmers in Canada and the US because Monsanto fields would be planted next to non Monsanto fields and the crops would cross pollinate. The superior Monsanto crop would take over and then the farmer would have to either pay restitution to Monsanto, or burn his crop and his seeds as they were now altered with the genes that Monsanto patented. The courts backed Monsanto on this one.xmetatr0nx said:Ok thats a bit much dont you think?Lullabye said:be part of the cause of another war or something
So what happens when a genetically altered species of something cross breeds or cross pollinates with something of another nation and wipes out that nation's ability to produce said species? It would not be good I can promise you that.
Otherwise, I am for genetic manipulation as long as it does not infringe on the rights of others.
So a lawsuit equals war here? Look no wars will be started over GMOs, lawsuits yes not wars. There are more trivial things that get people wanting to kill like jesus.
What I am saying is that there is the possibility because people go to war over stupidest shit like religion that they could go to war over something more rational such as watching their GDP plummet when a bacteriophage was modified to protect a plant, mutates, and kills a nations cattle. If said bacteriophage was traced back to a nation, and the company that created gives the other nation the finger...
i get it but why make bacteria if you could make the plant immune?Torian_Kel said:I was not insinuating that the US should attack Canada or that Lawsuits equal wars.xmetatr0nx said:My god youre right, the US should totaly attack canada...Torian_Kel said:Not really as there are companies out there who will go to extremes to protect of enforce their genetic licenses. For example Monsanto, who genetically modified a type of Canola seed started to ruin farmers in Canada and the US because Monsanto fields would be planted next to non Monsanto fields and the crops would cross pollinate. The superior Monsanto crop would take over and then the farmer would have to either pay restitution to Monsanto, or burn his crop and his seeds as they were now altered with the genes that Monsanto patented. The courts backed Monsanto on this one.xmetatr0nx said:Ok thats a bit much dont you think?Lullabye said:be part of the cause of another war or something
So what happens when a genetically altered species of something cross breeds or cross pollinates with something of another nation and wipes out that nation's ability to produce said species? It would not be good I can promise you that.
Otherwise, I am for genetic manipulation as long as it does not infringe on the rights of others.
So a lawsuit equals war here? Look no wars will be started over GMOs, lawsuits yes not wars. There are more trivial things that get people wanting to kill like jesus.
What I am saying is that there is the possibility because people go to war over stupidest shit like religion that they could go to war over something more rational such as watching their GDP plummet when a bacteriophage was modified to protect a plant, mutates, and kills a nations cattle. If said bacteriophage was traced back to a nation, and the company that created gives the other nation the finger...
xmetatr0nx said:Im sure jesus thought the same thing.Lullabye said:Well its simple really, i just plain dont like you...also rebuted isnt a word!!Torian_Kel said:how come when i said that i got rebuted? at least we have a few realists here.xmetatr0nx said:My god youre right, the US should totaly attack canada...Torian_Kel said:Otherwise, I am for genetic manipulation as long as it does not infringe on the rights of others.xmetatr0nx said:Ok thats a bit much dont you think?Lullabye said:be part of the cause of another war or something
I was not insinuating that the US should attack Canada or that Lawsuits equal wars.
What I am saying is that there is the possibility because people go to war over stupidest shit like religion that they could go to war over something more rational such as watching their GDP plummet when a bacteriophage was modified to protect a plant, mutates, and kills a nations cattle. If said bacteriophage was traced back to a nation, and the company that created gives the other nation the finger...
Or i was getting bored with this subject and decided that, while yes there is a far off chance that wars maybe started over this matter its highly unlikely.