fair enough, i'll give you that one. you're still a dick thoughtraceur_ said:Pseudo-science is not science, and you should learn the difference between a theory and a hypothesis.Archer147 said:wow. you seem friendly.traceur_ said:Absolutely not, it's physically impossible, not to mention fucking retarded.
there are multiple theories for the existence of ghosts. look them up before you go calling scientific theories fucking retarted.
Island said:your confusing my open-mindedness with the pointlessness of absolutes given by the intellectually arrogant. the foolishness of anyone thinking they know anything absolutely is absurd, annoying, and to be laughed at. its merely convenient for you to dismiss the fact that anything is possible even the unprovable and convenience isn't intelligence as snobby as some convenient thinkers may be its just easy.
Alright fair enough. You did answer the questions.PrototypeC said:OK, OK, Antlers. All flaming aside, I do have some answers for you.Antlers said:Care to actually answer any of the questions no?
One, I did answer your question about whether I actually believe. I had to think about it, but yes, I do. Why do I have to decide one way or the other anyway? Mainly I believe that emotions have lasting effects on the environment. I'm a little leery of quantum mechanics, but they do seem to confirm my belief. If emotions really do have an effect on the surrounding environment, then there's a lot of energy being left behind. I think that may be what people see as ghosts.
Two, I don't really think people should hunt ghosts. I'd like to see universities give serious scientific looks at these sorts of phenomena and see if there really is a link between all the various things believers state to be evidence of the existence of ghosts. Then we might get an answer... but I'm not sure if we have the tech right now to make unbiased scientific conclusions about all purported supernatural activity.
I'd like to go ghost hunting myself, but mostly because I like old buildings and photographing them. Ghost hunting is a fun thing to do; but it is NOT SCIENTIFIC. I'm so bored of this thread though... it's too depressing to think about. I guess it's one of those things up there with religion and politics.Antlers said:Alright fair enough. You did answer the questions.
Just for extra clarity for me though, are you saying that ghost hunting is the wrong way to go about things? And that's where your problem lies? I thought from your first post that you were saying the methods they use for ghost hunting are all just made up for the camera. I think I may have misunderstood.