Hey guys! Just a quick survey, note I'm not a google representative. Do you think when Halo Reach comes out, Google should put up a banner dedicated to Reach itself?
Poll: Halo Reach Google Bannner
- Thread starter toecrusher9009
- Start date
Recommended Videos
I do not think Google would do that, since it normally does things that involve something more positive than games...
But whatever...
But whatever...
No. God no. If they do it I will never use Google again. It's Reach, seriously why would they do that?
EDIT: Btw OP Welcome to the Escapist.
EDIT: Btw OP Welcome to the Escapist.
Nah, no real point.
It's a big game release but it doesn't really have the significance of a famous persons birthday, does it?
It's a big game release but it doesn't really have the significance of a famous persons birthday, does it?
Well, it is Bungie's last Halo game, then 343 industries is going to take over. So i think it would be pretty neet if they did that.Sassafrass said:
No. No no no, a thousand times no. Now, I'm an incredible Halo fanboy, but even I can see this is a bad idea. I generally look to the Google banners to say "Oh hey, that's something I haven't seen or heard of before, oh boy!" This would not work for Reach. For anyone.
Pacman is Pacman. Pacman is gaming legend. It was for Pacman's 30TH aniversay. That's a big thing. Halo is nice, but no. They won't and shouldn't.Starkiller8965 said:
Uhhhh, no.
Google banners are dedicated to rare occasions, and if Google put up a banner every time a big game came out than we would see one everyday.
Google banners are dedicated to rare occasions, and if Google put up a banner every time a big game came out than we would see one everyday.
Your avatar is awesome.Sassafrass said:
OT: I think they should, it would be a cool thing to do.
It would be neat, sure. But it would just seem a bit...odd, compared to the other banners.toecrusher9009 said:
Thanks.Benmonkey7 said:
Furburt made it for me and TheNumber1Zero added the images on it.[footnote]Always added when asked about avy, just to give credit.[/footnote]
Sure, but they didn't did a Halo 3 one, a MW2, a SC2 one, and Uncharted one, a MGS one, etc, etc, etc.Starkiller8965 said:
And no, I am not a fan of those games BTW (except SC2), but I doubt that Halo Reach has as much opportunity to get a banner like these other games.
That was to celebrate the anniversary of one of the most influential games in history.Starkiller8965 said:
Reach is not going to be one of the most influential games in history. Maybe Halo will get a banner in 20 years, but as for now...
NO.
Someone doesn't like Halo.LooK iTz Jinjo said:
OT: Meh. I don't pay attention to those, although I wouldn't disapprove if they did do it. I doubt they would anyway.
No, it would just be a right mess. Not only is it undeserving compared to some of the actually interesting things they put on the Google Banners, but then what next? A killzone 3 banner, Gears of war 3, the first kinect game that isn't a replication of a mundane activity? Plus, they didn't do one for Starcraft 2 and that had all of that immense anticipation from a huge, loyal fanbase.
Dude, I've got the Legendary Edition pre-ordered and even I know that it isn't nearly important enough to merit a Google banner. The only time I've ever seen Google do anything with games was Pac-Man a few months ago, and, y'know, that was freakin' Pac-Man, the most famous game of all time.