Poll: Have you preordered call of duty 4 modern warfare 2 yet?

Chrissyluky

New member
Jul 3, 2009
985
0
0
Crazzee said:
Chrissyluky said:
stabnex said:
No because I boycott any game that causes a $40 rise for all new games for the sake of greed.
what...? im confused when did the game that sold over 13m copies become so hated? and where did this hate ignite from???
Activision decided to hike up the price just because.

Anyway, no. The first Modern Warfare was terrible, generic, and not even mildly entertaining. The campaign was average at best, and the multiplayer that was held in such high regard is a horrible grind-fest. I refuse to pay for more of the same.
well thats your opinion and btw it only takes 1 day to hit max level. so much for grinding it simply used the leveling system as a reason to keep playing. and they hiked up the price because they realised it was a goldmine perhaps? thats not just because thats just a good buisness sense. if you see something you have selling that people want in high demand you hike up the price thats how it works... thats how you make money. thats boycotting someone for being a prosperious company
 

Chrissyluky

New member
Jul 3, 2009
985
0
0
stabnex said:
Chrissyluky said:
stabnex said:
No because I boycott any game that causes a $40 rise for all new games for the sake of greed.
what...? im confused when did the game that sold over 13m copies become so hated? and where did this hate ignite from???
Read this thread [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/7.126628] and find out. It's all there. Activision's evil plot for the sake of greed and greed alone raising the game in the UK from 30 Pounds (that's $50 - $60 American Dollars) to 55 Pounds ($90 - $100 American Dollars) and if it sells at expected rates than it'll stay at the new price hike.
seems the uk got ripped off :p im sorry? just buy the us version as long as you speak english i dont think theres a large difference(as long as you buy pc you wont have to connect to american servers).
 

theultimateend

New member
Nov 1, 2007
3,621
0
0
Chrissyluky said:
Crazzee said:
Chrissyluky said:
stabnex said:
No because I boycott any game that causes a $40 rise for all new games for the sake of greed.
what...? im confused when did the game that sold over 13m copies become so hated? and where did this hate ignite from???
Activision decided to hike up the price just because.

Anyway, no. The first Modern Warfare was terrible, generic, and not even mildly entertaining. The campaign was average at best, and the multiplayer that was held in such high regard is a horrible grind-fest. I refuse to pay for more of the same.
well thats your opinion and btw it only takes 1 day to hit max level. so much for grinding it simply used the leveling system as a reason to keep playing. and they hiked up the price because they realised it was a goldmine perhaps? thats not just because thats just a good buisness sense. if you see something you have selling that people want in high demand you hike up the price thats how it works... thats how you make money.
Yes because making money is the only admirable desire in this world. That's exactly why medication costs in the US have doubled in the last 10 years. They realized that people will come to them regardless and started stripping people of even more money.

Except in the case of this game they are only hurting retards who don't understand how capitalism is supposed to work (I wonder who I'm talking about here).

"There is one rule for the industrialist and that is: Make the best quality of goods possible at the lowest cost possible, paying the highest wages possible." - Henry Ford

That is how it is supposed to work and that is how you are supposed to make money. Fucking people in the ass just because you can is not what you are supposed to do. It is in fact the reason there are so many laws against monopolies and various other shady practices. The problem is that people get pounded in the ass so often they get loose and figure its supposed to be like that.
 

-Seraph-

New member
May 19, 2008
3,753
0
0
nah, there are other games coming out that deserve my money even more than another stock FPS. I hated the first one so there is little reason I'd enjoy it's sequel.
 

The Rockerfly

New member
Dec 31, 2008
4,649
0
0
No and chances are I won't buy it until it hits £20 because I as much as I love Activision for making Guitar Hero games
It doesn't give them the right to be cocks and I won't encourage them
 

SquirrelPants

New member
Dec 22, 2008
1,729
0
0
Chrissyluky said:
Crazzee said:
Chrissyluky said:
stabnex said:
No because I boycott any game that causes a $40 rise for all new games for the sake of greed.
what...? im confused when did the game that sold over 13m copies become so hated? and where did this hate ignite from???
Activision decided to hike up the price just because.

Anyway, no. The first Modern Warfare was terrible, generic, and not even mildly entertaining. The campaign was average at best, and the multiplayer that was held in such high regard is a horrible grind-fest. I refuse to pay for more of the same.
well thats your opinion and btw it only takes 1 day to hit max level. so much for grinding it simply used the leveling system as a reason to keep playing. and they hiked up the price because they realised it was a goldmine perhaps? thats not just because thats just a good buisness sense. if you see something you have selling that people want in high demand you hike up the price thats how it works... thats how you make money. thats boycotting someone for being a prosperious company
Or you could do the sure thing and release it for the average price, and sell more copies. Hiking up the price might make them more money at once, but less people are going to buy copies. I think it would be better for the company to sell ~6 million copies at 50-60 bucks a pop than it would be for them to sell ~2 million copies at $90. Assuming those numbers are correct:

2,000,000*$90=$180,000,000

6,000,000*$60=$360,000,000

They'd be making more profit in that fashion.

Also, being able to grind to max level in one day doesn't make it any less of a grind.
 

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
I pre-ordered it months ago along with my planned purchases for next year. I'll probably sell it after beating the single-player on veteran - CoD's multi-player is terrible.
 

bodyklok

New member
Feb 17, 2008
2,936
0
0
Chrissyluky said:
bodyklok said:
No, I'm going to wait for the price to go down before I buy it.
um good luck. the original cod 4 still sells for 50 dollars.
Well then I'll have to wait for a very long time, no matter.
Chrissyluky said:
and why wont you buy it? its going to be a very very good game unlike world at war(which was done by treyarch who likes to ruin the series every other year for stock purposes).
I will buy it, just not right now.
Chrissyluky said:
i dont know why any fps fan wouldnt pick it up really.
The price? Don't get me wrong, I can afford to pay for it, I just refuse to.
Chrissyluky said:
and by some of the responses im getting its starting to make me wonder if any of you have even gotten to max level >.> let alone tried different game modes besides the uber mindless team deathmatch. and what is so bad about the modern warfare fanbase...? why the hate people? i really would like a genuine reason ive only seen one that made sense so far...
I haven't gotten to any level, nor have I tried any of the game modes. For some retarded reason my modem won't connect to my PS3 (the only console I own COD4 for) and I can't go online.
 

bodyklok

New member
Feb 17, 2008
2,936
0
0
joe182 said:
bodyklok said:
No, I'm going to wait for the price to go down before I buy it.
Good luck with that.. you'll be waiting a while.
Mehh, it really doesn't matter to me that much, MW2 will be a great game but that doesn't mean I absolutely have to buy it.
 

Whistler777

New member
Nov 14, 2008
529
0
0
Crazzee said:
Chrissyluky said:
stabnex said:
No because I boycott any game that causes a $40 rise for all new games for the sake of greed.
what...? im confused when did the game that sold over 13m copies become so hated? and where did this hate ignite from???
Activision decided to hike up the price just because.

Anyway, no. The first Modern Warfare was terrible, generic, and not even mildly entertaining. The campaign was average at best, and the multiplayer that was held in such high regard is a horrible grind-fest. I refuse to pay for more of the same.
Alright, here's someone that's obviously trying to hate Call of Duty 4. Just because it's cool to hate popular things doesn't make CoD4 a bad game.

The campaign was generic? I don't seem to see multiple changes in environment and high-action modern warfare generic. Add to that the fact that you can shoot through walls (a feature every FPS game should have) and a story that's heaps better than most FPS (that's not saying much), and you have absolutely no right to call the game generic.

The multiplayer can't really be called a grindfest, as there's more than just Deathmatch mode. Customizable classes, perks, and incentive to unlock new weapons through leveling up make it about the freshest multiplayer experience since Perfect Dark.

If you don't like FPS games, just say so. ;)
 

Zeraki

WHAT AM I FIGHTING FOOOOOOOOR!?
Legacy
Feb 9, 2009
1,615
45
53
New Jersey
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Chrissyluky said:
stabnex said:
Chrissyluky said:
stabnex said:
No because I boycott any game that causes a $40 rise for all new games for the sake of greed.
what...? im confused when did the game that sold over 13m copies become so hated? and where did this hate ignite from???
Read this thread [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/7.126628] and find out. It's all there. Activision's evil plot for the sake of greed and greed alone raising the game in the UK from 30 Pounds (that's $50 - $60 American Dollars) to 55 Pounds ($90 - $100 American Dollars) and if it sells at expected rates than it'll stay at the new price hike.
seems the uk got ripped off :p im sorry? just buy the us version as long as you speak english i dont think theres a large difference(as long as you buy pc you wont have to connect to american servers).
I think regional codes would make that a little difficult to do.
 

SquirrelPants

New member
Dec 22, 2008
1,729
0
0
Whistler777 said:
Crazzee said:
Chrissyluky said:
stabnex said:
No because I boycott any game that causes a $40 rise for all new games for the sake of greed.
what...? im confused when did the game that sold over 13m copies become so hated? and where did this hate ignite from???
Activision decided to hike up the price just because.

Anyway, no. The first Modern Warfare was terrible, generic, and not even mildly entertaining. The campaign was average at best, and the multiplayer that was held in such high regard is a horrible grind-fest. I refuse to pay for more of the same.
Alright, here's someone that's obviously trying to hate Call of Duty 4. Just because it's cool to hate popular things doesn't make CoD4 a bad game.

The campaign was generic? I don't seem to see multiple changes in environment and high-action modern warfare generic. Add to that the fact that you can shoot through walls (a feature every FPS game should have) and a story that's heaps better than most FPS (that's not saying much), and you have absolutely no right to call the game generic.

The multiplayer can't really be called a grindfest, as there's more than just Deathmatch mode. Customizable classes, perks, and incentive to unlock new weapons through leveling up make it about the freshest multiplayer experience since Perfect Dark.

If you don't like FPS games, just say so. ;)
The formula they used is tried and true. I don't hate it because it's popular, I hate it because it isn't fun, and it didn't interest me. You have no right to say that my opinion is null and void because they had a few new features. Sure, shooting through walls is nice, but that doesn't make it any less of a copy-paste shooter that is mostly about hyperpatriotic American soldiers running around with an ego the size of the whole damned country. The SAS parts were rather interesting, but the whole "enemy spawnpoints are here, the enemies will stop spawning when you pass this place" thing really ruined a lot of firefights. I would have preferred shooting one at a time, and slipping through the shadows, killing them off one at a time, then moving on to the next objective. That seems more like something the SAS would do anyway.

The story itself wasn't generic, but it wasn't all that interesting, either. The point of having a story is to pull you in, not to connect one firefight in one city to another firefight in another city. It certainly helps when it does that, but you're supposed to care about characters or at the very LEAST about what you're doing in the story.

The multiplayer was all about grind. In every game mode, it boiled down to "Get kills, complete objectives, level up, get new weapons."

Admittedly, the game was rather good on a single playthrough, and for a few hours of multiplayer fun, but it all just fell apart shortly afterward. Everything in the game feels very samey, and pretty much everything from it has been done before, from mowing down terrorists as Americans to stealthing around and stabbing people in the butt(probably not as the SAS, but the gameplay's been done.)

I do NOT hate FPSes, I hate that all of them feel like exactly the same game these days. There's no hook, nothing to really pull you in and keep you interested in newer games.

But I'm sorry, I'm entitled to my opinion, and you can't say that I have no right to think that a game is pretty generic and not fun.
 

Spygon

New member
May 16, 2009
1,105
0
0
boycotted until it drops to £40 because i dont get told how much i should pay for things
 

khaimera

Perfect Strangers
Jun 23, 2009
1,957
0
0
Psychosocial said:
What? Call of Duty 4 Modern Warfare 2? Lulz.

I wouldn't get the game even if it was free. People keep bashing Halo for it's fanbase, but fuck me, the Call of Duty, especially Modern Warfare fanbase is by FAR worse.

I also don't really see what's so good about the games, I always found games like Battlefield to be far better FPS.
Here Here. I couldn't stand the muliplayer on Modern Warfare.
 

AvsJoe

Elite Member
May 28, 2009
9,055
0
41
Hate to be the ignorant one, but is this the game that features both the Nazi zombies and zombified Nazis? If so then there's a glimmer of hope that I may one day purchase it.
 

clicketycrack

New member
Apr 6, 2009
1,034
0
0
Nope. I never pre-order anything, but I'm probably going to get it for Christmas. If I hear that it sucks, I'll just get L4D2 instead.
 

FinalHeart95

New member
Jun 29, 2009
2,164
0
0
I'll probably get it. I'm in the States, so it's a normal price.

Also, not to nitpick, but I believe the game is called Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 now, but I'm not positive.