I'd let him shoot me, then catch the bullet with my teeth and put HIS bullet into MY gun killing HIM with HIS own bullet.
Something much like this.MasterSqueak said:I shoot him with my concealed Glock 10mm.
Why do you think I have it, and my concealed weapons liscense?
Making your self a human shield or using some one else as a human shield isn't has effective has you would think. Tests on Mythbusters confirms that a Bullet can pierce through Fat and Muscle very easily your best bet would be if he's just carrying light ammunition so and hits a bone, larger ammo or ammo used in a M16 or AK-47 would just tear you and the shield to shreds.EisBaron said:Yeah, cause jumping at him is the safest thing I can think of.....deadman91 said:I'd probably jump at him, or stand in front of a loved one as a shield, whichever's safer at the time.
Oh, just the fact that I haven't for an instant argued "that such a thing can't be done." I've argued that it all depends on the someone though, and not as much you. This makes it a bad idea to do if your option is to just wait to see what the hell he wants. That doesn't necessarily mean compliance (though it can, if it's something incidental.) That doesn't mean cowering. That doesn't mean getting raped (apparently in the middle of a busy supermarket???) It can mean talking and deescalation. It can mean other things too. But forcing someone into the position of shooting you or losing control of the situation is not the kind of rational choice of which you want to be on the losing side.hoopyfrood said:If you had the skill to disarm an armed attacker you would not be arguing that such a thing can't be done. Obviously.Seanchaidh said:It's ironic that you're talking about defense mechanisms while pointlessly insulting a person whose mental and physical toughness you have absolutely no idea about.
And what exactly have I ignored?It's also ironic that you talk about 'straw men' while blithely ignoring what I've said to try to fit it into your little argumentative caricature.