So, I'm an old bastard... I played Pong and Frogger as a kid. They were mind blowing then, now they're interesting for historical reasons. I've seen the evolution of games first hand and make no mistake, it HAS BEEN an evolution!
Progressive improvements have been made and flaws that "just come with the territory" are no longer permissable. So, now that games are a a certain height of techincal ability, how important is the immersive nature of modern games?
I can't abide weak arse programming in games any better than I can poor continuity in my cinema. Why? Because it disrupts the effect of the media. I love a good media experience, be it a book, a movie or a game. For me, even as an old bugger who had to be thrilled and awed when King's Quest came out... I think the industry needs to lift its game relative to it's capabilities...
How 'bout you?
Progressive improvements have been made and flaws that "just come with the territory" are no longer permissable. So, now that games are a a certain height of techincal ability, how important is the immersive nature of modern games?
I can't abide weak arse programming in games any better than I can poor continuity in my cinema. Why? Because it disrupts the effect of the media. I love a good media experience, be it a book, a movie or a game. For me, even as an old bugger who had to be thrilled and awed when King's Quest came out... I think the industry needs to lift its game relative to it's capabilities...
How 'bout you?