Poll: Injustice of the Permaban

Recommended Videos

Joccaren

Elite Member
Mar 29, 2011
2,597
3
43
Yes and no.

I like the strict moderation keeping trolls and spambots out, but at the same time its making me use these forums less and less, and start actually hating them. These days I honestly don't want to post all that much, and I have to put it down indirectly to the moderation on the site.
Now, its not because I'm scared I'll get warned. Think I've got two warnings, one was definitely for a low content post that I'm somewhat against [It answered the question in the OP. Yeah I could have added on "That series really needs another installment" and been fine, but I'm not seeing how that adds any more content than my answer TBH] but W/E, moderators discretion and I'll add in that extra line from now on, just to keep them happy. Other one I think was also a low content post, not entirely sure though. Might have posted something that someone got offended by, but I generally stay pretty safe with that.

That does, however slightly preface my larger problem; moderation is somewhat flawed thanks to the rules. As I said above, I generally stay pretty safe when posting something someone may get offended by. How? Instead of saying "You're an idiot and a troll" I write something more along the lines of "You are acting like a troll" or "I feel like you're acting intentionally dense". Rather than outright calling someone something, you put in a "It looks like", "It feels like" or some other qualifier and it gets passed off as you're not insulting them, you're saying that they are acting/looking like someone who you would insult, or they come across that way to you. Basically, you're putting it as an implied "I'm not calling you this, but its how you're acting". This, along with all the "STRAWMAN!", "FALLACY!" and other inflammatory responses that don't get moderated as they're not directly insulting make these forums unpleasant a lot of the time.

I've seen people in this thread, and in others, say things like "Just stay away from topics on...", "I only post if a thread is less than 3 pages long" and other assorted "Just stay away from certain threads and you'll be fine" types of posts. Do you not see how WRONG that is. Forums are for discussions. If you have to stay away from discussions in order to avoid getting banned, there is something wrong. Really, the only reason you have to stay away from those threads is that someone in those threads will be passive aggressive towards you, or indirectly offensive, and you'll come out and be obvious about it rather than hiding behind what could be considered loopholes in the forum rules, and you'll get a warning whilst they get off scott free. TBH I'd gladly take a bunch of warnings for all the times I've posted something like that, and probably get banned in the process, if it'd set a precedent for everyone else receiving the same sort of punishment, as it'd IMO make the forums a better place.

The rules really focus on the wrong things, or are too vague in some areas, for the moderation to make this place a really pleasant place to be. Honestly the post Vault got banned for was nowhere near as insulting, hostile or offensive as half the posts I've replied to in gaming discussions. Hell, I'd struggle to call it any of them at all, but subjectivity and all that I guess. Really, this forum is a place of "So long as you're careful about how you do it, and don't do it openly, you can insult people as much as you want!". Its as unpleasant to post in as the Sins of a Solar Empire forums are to read. I remember when Skyrim was released, and I got into a massive 3-4 page argument with someone over whether the Stormcloaks or the Imperials were better [God knows there's a repeat of that thread around now too], and I enjoyed it. Neither of us were aggressive, we bought up lore and had a long discussion before deciding to put aside our differences in order to fight the greater threat of the Thalmor. The long arguments I've gotten into since then makes it feel like, were I to have the same argument again, it'd be implied that I'm a neo-nazi who supports the oppression of minorities, and that I consider non-white races less important than myself, and that's why I'd choose the Stormcloaks. Whether that'd happen or not IDK, with discussions about games its a bit more of a flip of the coin as to whether you'll get insulted for your opinion as opposed to general discussion where its normally a 9/10 chance of that happening, but every time I go to post it feels like I'll be attacked for what I post instead of getting a reasoned and logical response.

Recently its been happening less to me, but I'm not sure whether that's because most of the passive-aggressive posters have finally been banned, or because I've stopped myself from posting in a lot of threads that I normally would post in because I know I'll get a passive aggressive response and I don't want to have to deal with that because the person won't get banned. Really, I don't care to find out either, I'm not up for making that sort of gamble.

TBH there's probably 4-5 posters around ATM that make me like these forums. Once they're gone... I'll probably disappear. No offence to anyone else, most people generally aren't offensive or aggressive in their posts, but the interesting posters are disappearing, and the people who do make these forums unpleasant have left a bad taste in my mouth.

I'd also like to point out that its not necessarily the moderators I have a problem with. They're all nice people who are generally fun and I'd probably enjoy the forums more if they participated in more discussions, as they are often interesting posters, they just don't seem to appear very often, but the fact that the rules make it possible to write offensive or aggressive posts, and then not receive any sort of warning for them because you really haven't broken any rules, makes this place rather unpleasant at times.
 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,569
0
0
TimeLord said:
Leaving aside that you are attempting to bribe completely the wrong person, you are only 3 1/2 months away from losing a notch from your bar.
Question for you...

If you get an infraction, and that infraction is overturned on appeal, is your 6 month counter reset to 6 months? Or does it revert to whatever it was before the infraction?
 

major_chaos

Ruining videogames
Feb 3, 2011
1,313
0
0
JoJo said:
I myself have close to 8000 posts and no infractions.
Probably because in all my time here I have never even seen the text equivalent of you raising your voice. Nothing wrong with that mind you, just some people *points to self* have a hard time remaining 100% neutral. dammit sometimes people on the internet are WRONG and I feel the need to criticize them -_-.


maddawg IAJI said:
When has a moderator ever been an asshole to you exactly?
Jumping in on this conversation. To me personally? Never. But just in general I feel Grey and Marter can be a bit on the smug and prickish side occasionally, and Sky sometimes comes across a bit victimized and whiny on the mod chat, but the emoticons make me suspect that most of that is just playing. Also I seem to remember on review (don't remember which sadly) where someone who questioned the review got ganged up on by like three Goldnames.


Susan Arendt said:
So your enjoyment of R&P is more important than someone else's desire to not have to deal with Danyal's particular bullshit? Sorry, but that's a very selfish point of view.
Just a quick question, can I go into the ten billionth inane "TEH INDUSTRY IS DYING GUIES/ EA IS EBULL" threat and tell the repeat offenders that I'm "sick of their particular bullshit" without getting modded? I'm kinda assuming not.

OT: I have some small gripes but my 2 biggest issues with the moderation (other than the one in my avatar) are
1. The permabanned avatar. Its smug, vindictive, immature and pointless, and it needs to go.
2. It seems to me sometimes that you can be as much of an asshole as you want, as long as you are either a. passive aggressive or b. pseudo-intellectual about it. Example would be how long it took Katori-kun to get banned even though he was extremely hostile and condescending from day one. There are other, active users who I would say seem to exploit this as well.
inb4 I get warned for "modsass".
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,756
0
0
Drathnoxis said:
I feel that the ten strike warning system is bound to take out most of the frequent posters eventually, or at least the more interesting ones because, really, everybody slips up now and again and depending on how much they post it may be more often than within *six months* of their last mistake.
Look, I post her a lot in a day. More than I should. In three years of regular posting, I've received two warnings, and I managed to work one off. I think one of those warnings was questionable, but whatever, that's not exactly my point here. I've managed three years of routine posting. Interesting, of course, is debatable, but for some reason people keep responding to me and agreeing with me and even friending me. Maybe not the great camaraderie of a lifetime, but I'm not exactly worried about it, either.

And in my time, I've seen a lot of people with high post rates and similarly long careers manage to not get themselves banned. Meanwhile, I've seen people permabanned within the year. I really doubt it's time. I think it's attitude. Some people are bound to hit it because they don't play well with the rules of the site.

Since Vault 101 has already been brought up, let me say this: she was well aware she was breaking the rules. She had said so multiple times in the past. She refused to stop doing the things that got her moderated, so she got banned. I get that people like her, which seems to be the only time the system is really brought up, but there's a reason she's gone. And it's not a particularly unjust one.

This, I believe, makes her a good example of the phenomena.

I don't think prolific posters are more prone to being banned, because "slipping up" is relatively easy to avoid. If you follow the basic tenet of "don't be a dick," you've already covered like 95% of slipping up.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,305
0
0
TimeLord said:
snip for attention
One really quick question, by the way... What's the official mod stance on "Stupid and pointless threads done in good humor for the entertainment of all"?

Like, say, the Brovengers/Injustice League threads?
 

Marter

Elite Member
Legacy
Oct 27, 2009
14,268
19
43
BloatedGuppy said:
Question for you...

If you get an infraction, and that infraction is overturned on appeal, is your 6 month counter reset to 6 months? Or does it revert to whatever it was before the infraction?
I believe, and see no reason to believe otherwise, that if the appeal is successful the time until the next period of amnesty would remain the same, just like if you hadn't gotten the wrath at all.

lacktheknack said:
One really quick question, by the way... What's the official mod stance on "Stupid and pointless threads done in good humor for the entertainment of all"?

Like, say, the Brovengers/Injustice League threads?
As long as there's something to discuss, they're fine. Most of them have been, from what I've seen.
major_chaos said:
But just in general I feel Grey and Marter can be a bit on the smug and prickish side occasionally
Aww. :/
 

xDarc

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2009
1,333
0
41
I was just going through my warnings/probation messages and because I post in R&P mostly it's never something as simple as don't attack other users.

One of my system messages for a 7 day probation has a mod message of "That's garbage and untrue."

Ok... Excuse me and my opinion then.

Katatori-Kun's recent ban was particularly concerning as his discourse was very adult, hell it ought to have been, guy was in his 40s. He makes one comment about fast food workers which most adults wouldn't even flinch at and he's gone for what seemed like no reason. I personally would love to find a more adult web site with a gaming community that is not dead.

Before here I was at MMORPG.com forever, before that I was on a website where anyone could create their own message board, and you could link them together in a "web ring" (defunct 90's term). insidetheweb.com, if you go there now it's just a stub site as the domain has long since been sold.

Forums come, forums go, it's the cycle of life on the net- and yes moderation does help kill it, and it's always funny because most people never have a problem... until the same topics are trending on page 1 for several days when they used to not last an hour.

But, whatever. I'm just a nomadic forum grazer, eating the grass until it's gone. I'm David Banner at the end of an episode of the incredible hulk, walking down the series of tubes trying to hitch a ride.
 

major_chaos

Ruining videogames
Feb 3, 2011
1,313
0
0
Marter said:
Well when you put it like that I feel bad -_- although I kinda assumed you had me on ignore anyway. Nothing personal though, I just disagree with some post you have made, and I feel at least one would have gotten a warning for anyone else.
 

Marter

Elite Member
Legacy
Oct 27, 2009
14,268
19
43
major_chaos said:
Well when you put it like that I feel bad -_- although I kinda assumed you had me on ignore anyway. Nothing personal though, I just disagree with some post you have made, and I feel at least one would have gotten a warning for anyone else.
I don't have anyone on ignore.

And it's cool. I can be condescending and a bit smug/prickly (though I do try not to be). You're not necessarily wrong. I try to be fun most of the time. That likely doesn't come across on the forums all that often anymore. You should've been in here in 2010. =D
 

Darks63

New member
Mar 8, 2010
1,562
0
0
The system is much better that it used to be I lurked here from 2008 till 2010. When i finally joined up one of the reasons i delurked was because it got much better.
 

CardinalPiggles

New member
Jun 24, 2010
3,224
0
0
Eleuthera said:
Really you don't just accidentally make 8 low-content posts. One or two before you understand the rules, maybe.
I can vouch for this.

One low content post and one sassy and unjustified response was enough for me to learn the freakin rules.

2500 or so posts later and I have a clean record. It's not difficult.
 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,569
0
0
Marter said:
I believe, and see no reason to believe otherwise, that if the appeal is successful the time until the next period of amnesty would remain the same, just like if you hadn't gotten the wrath at all.
Any way you can tell me what the delay until my next "amnesty" is?

Marter said:
If it helps, I've never found you smug nor prickish in the slightest.

Indeed, thanks to your old avatar I spent a few months picturing you as Anna Kendrick. =\

Loved you in 50/50.
 

Marter

Elite Member
Legacy
Oct 27, 2009
14,268
19
43
BloatedGuppy said:
Any way you can tell me what the delay until my next "amnesty" is? Just under a month and a half, assuming my math is right.

If it helps, I've never found you smug nor prickish in the slightest.

Indeed, thanks to your old avatar I spent a few months picturing you as Anna Kendrick. =\

Loved you in 50/50.
Lol! I wish I was Anna Kendrick.
 

Pebkio

The Purple Mage
Nov 9, 2009
780
0
0
I've cussed, ranted, poked fun at the Escapist's sponsors, spoke ill of their features, mentioned naught things, and briefly spoke of pirating in a positive light (not that I've done it, just that I can understand why it' done). I've only ever been slapped with a warning:

When I outright insulted a fellow forum member. Not insinuated, I actually called him an insulting label. That's it.

---

I also understand that admitting or boasting of illegal activity is another thing for which to be slapped. Unclever trolling and harrasing I'll wager gets you flying up the forum meter. Yadda yadda.

This board, to me, has been quite lenient. I was once on a forum that got up in arms because I didn't cite a source for something as innocuous as "more people pirate movies than books". I certainly don't post as often as some of the regulars, but if you happen to think the most interesting people are the people getting punished, then maybe you're on the wrong forum. Even if I did post 100 times a day, I'd avoid a lot of mod ire because of one simple, last-second-before-I-push-post, edit: "Does this piece of hate really need to be said publicly?" If the post would get me in trouble, the answer is usually no.

...except that one time because the guy really was . :p
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,485
0
0
I'm going to say yes. The fact of the matter is that the mods are passionate people about what irks them, not coldly logical. they might hold on over what doesn't directly affect them and punish normally (maybe), but then you take an incident where thery go and take it personally and it gets blown out of proportion. The reason why is simple: They're human. They'll try to justify that it was the right action, because humans do that, but LIKE humans...they also have a big problem with admittance of a flaw in their actions. This is a severe problem with people in power.

So, there was an incident where I received a hefty punishment that seemed too strong for the issue involved (because by god I don't like the new site layout, but oh shame they can't take a tomato to the face like everyone else), and I had a 3-day suspension. Top this off with the fact that the editor called me a dick, and you can see where passion played into the thing. But hey, it doesn't end there. Fast forward to my communicating with one of the most decent users on the forum and he getting grumbled at with veiled threats when he tried to help me, and THEN I found out that a random user - nobody I knew, just one of you random guys out there - defended me and got banned.

This all happened, and you can make the argument that I might've deserved punishment if you like...but the name-calling, the threats to someone trying to help me, and the banning of an innocent is NOT right. That's needless colateral. Hardly any of my anger gets poured into the internet. I can't get more than mildly irritated at the goings-on of a forum unless I spent time getting invested in the lives of the people I talk to on a personal level. So, to put that in perspective, I will NEVER forget those who were shot in the head when they tried to help another. Never...
 

Canadamus Prime

Robot in Disguise
Jun 17, 2009
14,331
0
0
TimeLord said:
Forgive the dead horse I'm about to brutally chainsaw but as stated by several mods and Susan in this thread, if you don't learn your lesson after 8 (!) opportunities then it's not our fault you can't follow the rules which are always available to read under the 'Forums' drop down menu above.
That's great and all, but some of us weren't given the benefit of the same 8 chances that everyone else was (yes, still bitter and very angry about that).

EDIT: No rudeness or jerkishness intended.
 

Eri

The Light of Dawn
Feb 21, 2009
3,626
0
0
Honestly, the infraction bar has only made me post less, not magically make more "polite" posts.

If I have something to say such as calling a poster a complete moron, because, they clearly are, I just won't post anything despite the fact what I would post would be wholly true. Being rude doesn't make something less true.

A common argument used against being abrasive is that there is no reason for it, but nor is there reason to act like a moron/idiot/bigot etc and yet people do. So why is it allowable to act like a dumb ass?

A, perhaps, perfect example is in the Chinese man-rape thread. A poster, whose name I shan't type, was spouting blatantly wrong things disprovable by science in every regard. Despite this, it still would not have been allowed to call him "a total fucking idiot". Again, despite all evidence to support this accusation.

Another issue is the complete lack of consistency across the mod-team-board. But alas.
 

zehydra

New member
Oct 25, 2009
5,029
0
0
No. Permabanning after several warnings is justified.

Ultimately, this is a totally voluntary website to begin with, and not a place that someone is entitled to. If moderation sees it fit to remove a member they deem offending, then so be it. "Justice" is not part of this equation at all.
 

BathorysGraveland2

New member
Feb 9, 2013
1,386
0
0
I think the moderation is mostly fine. The only glaring problem I have with it is the "perma-banned" avatar. It just reeks of a juvenile "ha, you're in trouble" remark. It seems a little hypocritical to me that users cannot insult one another (for good reason), yet mods can insult the banned users with that avatar.
 

GrimTuesday

New member
May 21, 2009
2,488
0
0
I think that the health bar is a good thing because you know exactly where you stand and what you will get if you step out of line. Of course, it can also lead to you getting screwed over by a bunch of little things.

I think that the moderation in R&P, while better, still needs to be refined. I've said from the beginning there should be more leeway within the context of discussing issues due to the level of passion these subjects bring out in people. I'd rather it be abused than lose a quality voice in the discussions.