Poll: Interpretive Endings

Recommended Videos

Last Bullet

New member
Apr 28, 2010
537
0
0
Seems to be search bar approved.

NO ACTUAL SPOILERS, I KEPT IT AS VAGUE AS HUMANLY POSSIBLE But skip it regardless if you're paranoid. Sorry for that, should have put it farther up.

Well, after seeing Inception last night I got into a conversation with a friend on the way home. I won't say what you're deciding about, just know that it's an open ending, and the audience is free to determine what they think happened. There's even a fair amount of evidence for both sides.

I can understand, and appreciate to some degree, the point of doing that. It can be fun to consider, to talk about, and of course that spreads the word about the movie. But it kind of annoys me, like my friend said, "It's YOUR story, YOU tell me what happened." So, after seeing a few threads about Inception itself, I figured I'd make this thread out of curiosity.

How do you feel about interpretive endings? Do you like letting the ending be in your hands, or are you like me and would prefer to hear the "correct" answer from the storyteller?
 

child of lileth

The Norway Italian
Jun 10, 2009
2,248
0
0
It depends for me. There''s plenty of games, light novels, and movies that had open ending left to the audience to decide, and I have a different feeling about each one. It mainly depends on how well done the rest of it was.
 

Radeonx

New member
Apr 26, 2009
7,012
0
0
It's completely dependent on what the story is, how it was told, and how well the story was executed.
So I'm on the fence.
 

RatRace123

Elite Member
Dec 1, 2009
6,649
0
41
I guess it depends on the movie, and how they set up the ending, if it's well made and the interperative ending was clever then yeah. But if not, then no. And I only really like it in very intelligent, mindy-screwy movies, in movies like Star Wars I feel much better to actually know the ending.
 

atombeast707

New member
Dec 8, 2009
307
0
0
check it out, my friend and i were discussing the same thing, and we got this:

dont say i didnt warn you. this spoils the ENTIRE FUCKING MOVIE

[spoiler: OMG ITZ MASSIVE SPOILER TIME]The idea of ?Inception? is to be a story crafted in the architecture of the mind ? Cobb?s mind. What people perceive to be real isn?t necessarily so, because the mind can make things appear to be as real as ever. An important thing to remember is the start of the film. Dom Cobb wakes up in a place that we later find out to be limbo ? more importantly, Saito?s limbo.

What happens next is something that is meaningless the first time a viewer watches the film. Saito is seen handling Cobb?s totem (which was a top that he took from Mal while in limbo). At first, this is meaningless. Upon a second viewing, the viewer should realize that everything that happens after this scene (the jump cut to Cobb?s attempt at extracting information from Saito, and so on) is something much deeper.

Saito promises to give Cobb the one thing that he wants, and that?s to find the way back home. How does he convince Cobb to do this? He tells him to ?take a leap of faith.? This is another line that goes unnoticed at first. On a second viewing, the viewer should remember that line as something that Mal told Cobb when she jumped off of the building. Is the picture becoming clearer yet?

Cobb seems to appear wherever he needs to go, whether it is Paris, or Mombasa, just like it were a dream. While in Mombasa, Cobb gets chased by anonymous agents (which he perceives to be Cobol agents) through a fantastic action sequence where Cobb escapes the dream-like narrow tunnel and is rescued by none other than Saito. A bit later, Cobb and Saito visit Yusef who brings them into a basement with various figures connected to the dream machine. The idea was for Cobb to experiment with the deep sedative. He does, and when he ?wakes up? he tries to use his totem only to be interrupted by Saito. Cobb never does find out if he is in the real world or not. In fact, he hasn?t been yet. He?s been in limbo ever since he got there with Mal. Ever since then, he?s been going deeper and deeper to the point where he created Saito as a projection to help him ?get back home? ? Did you really think Saito can just pick up the phone and make murder charges disappear? No. But, Cobb believes it and thus Saito is used to thrust Cobb further and further into a state of limbo ? where at the end of the journey, Cobb truly believes he is with his children after confronting and getting over his projection of Mal.

While in the limbo, Cobb, using Mal?s totem, put the idea in her head that she was in the dream world. She was, she just hadn?t realized it yet. What the viewer forgets is that all knowledge of limbo comes from Cobb?s character. To think that Cobb is 100% accurate about it is absolutely wrong. He wouldn?t know dream from reality ? not in the limbo that he describes to people ? and definitely not if inception were performed on him to believe that limbo truly was the real world.

Mal and Cobb never really left limbo ? at least, not that layer of it. When Mal jumped off the building, she gave herself the very same ?kick? that Ariadne improvised later on in the movie. Mal was right about still being in the dream world. Cobb was still engulfed in limbo and didn?t realize it. Cobb believed that if you die in limbo once the sedative wore off, you would simply wake up in the real world. That may be true, but it only happens if the sedative wore off. When Cobb and Mal had killed themselves with the train, the sedative was not worn off yet and they simply moved one layer deeper (this happens again at the end of the film when Saito picks up the gun in front of Cobb).

Cobb, deep in limbo, unknowingly uses the projections of his team to keep going deeper and deeper until the idea of inception is performed on his mind, and he truly believes he was able to find a way back home. Saito?s promise to Cobb was kept - in the form of Saito (a projection from Cobb) making sure that Cobb ended up in limbo, so that he could live his "life" with his kids (who are still wearing the same clothing as they did throughout the film).

The team were projections in Cobb?s mind the entire time. It?s how he was able to go to Miles in Paris and find an architect named Ariadne (a name which comes from a Greek mythology story about a labyrinth) who improvised the ?kick? at the end of the movie the same way that Cobb had seen (but not accepted as a dream) Mal do previously when she jumped off the building. It?s how Eames happened to know of Yusef, and so on and so forth. Everything Cobb needed to make this inception work happened to work out for him. It?s even how Cobb?s lawyer knew so quickly that Mal had gone to 3 different shrinks to be declared ?sane? and how he happened to have two tickets for Cobb to be able to get out of the country before the police would have arrested him.

The movie ends with Cobb appearing from place to place, going from limbo with Saito, to the plane where Saito magically makes one phone call to free Cobb from his problems, to walking through the airport, to meeting Miles who is with Cobb?s children. Cobb spins his totem and it spins just like it was a dream. He fixes his eyes on his children and the totem begins to lose speed ? this is because inception has worked ? Cobb truly believes he is in the real world. His totem will not spin like it did in the dream, not as long as he has his kids. The title of the film is now shown to us, making complete sense because the title was really Cobb?s journey through his own mind: INCEPTION [/spoiler]
 

WestMountain

New member
Dec 8, 2009
809
0
0
They can be good, I liked how they executed it in Shutter Island

Where they gave you all answers in the end but then I started wondering if it wasn't so that he really was a marshall that arrived to the island and then the doctors messed with his mind and drugged him into believing that he was an intern who had murdered his wife.
 

Asturiel

the God of Pants
Nov 24, 2009
3,938
0
0
Demented Teddy said:
Not reading the OP....

Is there ANY spoilers in it?
If so a spoiler alert in the title would be nice.
Aside from the discussion were having about a certain aspect of the end (that isn't specific to the movie) yes it's clean.

OT: I would really have to say it depends on how its done, if it's just a cliffhanger then I feel like strangling them, however an ending that isn't quite decisive is nice from time to time. Frankly though I have no preference.