Poll: Is Biology A Science?

Recommended Videos

SckizoBoy

Ineptly Chaotic
Legacy
Jan 6, 2011
8,678
200
68
A Hermit's Cave
fates_puppet13 said:
biology is without a doubt a science
so is chemistry and physics
which are the 3 hard sciences

however
qantum physics
psychology
sociology
philosophy
taxonomy
astronomy
and geology

are all sciences in their own right in my opinion

however people will probably state that some are covered by the 3 hard sciences
are not fully considered a science yet
or that geology isn't a science
What about anthropology? Though I'm sure many people would take issue with you classifying philosophy as a science (not to mention sociology).
 

pliusmannn

New member
Dec 4, 2008
245
0
0
well i can tell you this: your girl pretty much doesn't understand what science is. and for taxonomy, it counts pretty much as variables in equasions in physics. Biology is definetely a science, and is pretty much as fundamental as physics (not ecology of course)
 

fates_puppet13

New member
Dec 20, 2010
247
0
0
SckizoBoy said:
fates_puppet13 said:
biology is without a doubt a science
so is chemistry and physics
which are the 3 hard sciences

however
qantum physics
psychology
sociology
philosophy
taxonomy
astronomy
and geology

are all sciences in their own right in my opinion

however people will probably state that some are covered by the 3 hard sciences
are not fully considered a science yet
or that geology isn't a science
What about anthropology? Though I'm sure many people would take issue with you classifying philosophy as a science (not to mention sociology).
heard of it but idk what it is
*looks it up*

interesting
yes thats a science
 

artanis_neravar

New member
Apr 18, 2011
2,560
0
0
similar.squirrel said:
Discaimer: I think it is.

Anyway. My girlfriend takes the XKCD stance, whereby she claims that mathematics and physics are the only 'true' sciences, and that all aspects of biology are more akin to an art. Strangely, she seems to think that genetics is exempt, but things like ecology and taxonomy definitely do not fall within the realm of science.
She thinks the same applies to psychology and sociology, though I'd be inclined to agree sometimes, given that those subjects don't deal with phenomena that are immediately or easily quantifiable.

I agree insofar as all biology has a chemical basis, and all chemistry has a physical basis, but still. The systematic study of any phenomena, to me, is a science. We could study anatomy in terms of physics [biophysics dabbles with this], but it seems inherently ridiculous to discredit an entire branch of science because it uses a different set of vocabulary.

Thoughts?


EDIT: Be civilized. I don't appreciate anybody being called an idiot, much less somebody I'm close to. I was asking for an opinion regards this specific question, not my choice of partner.
Biology is a science, math is not a science, at all. Math is just....math. and psychology and sociology are social sciences which I consider different then normal sciences
 

Thaliur

New member
Jan 3, 2008
617
0
0
Rascarin said:
The way I see it - if you get to wear a lab coat, you're doing science.
I have to reject your explanation, as it would mean that medicine is also a science. It's most definitely not.

Biology is, though.
 

Midnight Crossroads

New member
Jul 17, 2010
1,912
0
0
lol wut

Biology is one of the hardest sciences in the entire pantheon of science. Saying it's not because you like another field better is the type of retarded stuff students from different science departments rag each other about at lunch.
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,184
0
0
similar.squirrel said:
Discaimer: I think it is.

Anyway. My girlfriend takes the XKCD stance, whereby she claims that mathematics and physics are the only 'true' sciences, and that all aspects of biology are more akin to an art. Strangely, she seems to think that genetics is exempt, but things like ecology and taxonomy definitely do not fall within the realm of science.
She thinks the same applies to psychology and sociology, though I'd be inclined to agree sometimes, given that those subjects don't deal with phenomena that are immediately or easily quantifiable.

I agree insofar as all biology has a chemical basis, and all chemistry has a physical basis, but still. The systematic study of any phenomena, to me, is a science. We could study anatomy in terms of physics [biophysics dabbles with this], but it seems inherently ridiculous to discredit an entire branch of science because it uses a different set of vocabulary.

Thoughts?


EDIT: Be civilized. I don't appreciate anybody being called an idiot, much less somebody I'm close to. I was asking for an opinion regards this specific question, not my choice of partner.
My thoughts are not very nice, but I will try. Psychology and sociology, I can almost see being argued, although they are still conducted with scientific method and still produce repeatable quantitative results, so I cal them sciences, but I can see the argument.
However, chemistry, biology, ect, are very much true sciences and cannot be discounted.

Yes, they are based on physics, but you can study them in depth without studying the physics they are based on. Thats why people study these things instead of just studying physics.

Also, Math is not a science. There is no scientific discovery, or scientific method. Math is a very important language for science, but in and of itself, it is not a science because it has no inherent connection to the world around us and science is a study of the world around us. You need math to do any kind of advanced science, but mathematics can be used with completely imaginary scenarios and numbers, it has no inherent connection to the real world, so it isn't a science.
 

SckizoBoy

Ineptly Chaotic
Legacy
Jan 6, 2011
8,678
200
68
A Hermit's Cave
similar.squirrel said:
When the heck did this get necro'd?
About ten hours ago... you can blame a certain person in Brighton, UK for whom a penny just dropped with regard to my labcoat of pure awesome. -_-
 

similar.squirrel

New member
Mar 28, 2009
6,020
0
0
SckizoBoy said:
similar.squirrel said:
When the heck did this get necro'd?
About ten hours ago... you can blame a certain person in Brighton, UK for whom a penny just dropped with regard to my labcoat of pure awesome. -_-
You're the snappy entomologist, right? I was actually hoping to get in touch with somebody scientific. Had a great idea today..
 

SckizoBoy

Ineptly Chaotic
Legacy
Jan 6, 2011
8,678
200
68
A Hermit's Cave
similar.squirrel said:
You're the snappy entomologist, right? I was actually hoping to get in touch with somebody scientific. Had a great idea today..
'Snappy entomologist'? That's a new one... hmmm... I'll take it as a compliment.

Well... the 'snap' ain't here at the moment. *sigh* :(
 

similar.squirrel

New member
Mar 28, 2009
6,020
0
0
SckizoBoy said:
similar.squirrel said:
You're the snappy entomologist, right? I was actually hoping to get in touch with somebody scientific. Had a great idea today..
'Snappy entomologist'? That's a new one... hmmm... I'll take it as a compliment.

Well... the 'snap' ain't here at the moment. *sigh* :(
'Snappy' in the well-dressed sense. What happened to the 'snap', though?
 

SckizoBoy

Ineptly Chaotic
Legacy
Jan 6, 2011
8,678
200
68
A Hermit's Cave
similar.squirrel said:
SckizoBoy said:
'Snappy entomologist'? That's a new one... hmmm... I'll take it as a compliment.

Well... the 'snap' ain't here at the moment. *sigh* :(
'Snappy' in the well-dressed sense. What happened to the 'snap', though?
Oh, you meant 'snappy' as in my labcoat? Thought you meant the style of my posts... (if there was any). Never mind...

Though, I don't think a labcoat like mine can ever be classed as 'snappy', so I wonder: how do you know how I dress? ... you spying on me?
 

similar.squirrel

New member
Mar 28, 2009
6,020
0
0
SckizoBoy said:
similar.squirrel said:
SckizoBoy said:
'Snappy entomologist'? That's a new one... hmmm... I'll take it as a compliment.

Well... the 'snap' ain't here at the moment. *sigh* :(
'Snappy' in the well-dressed sense. What happened to the 'snap', though?
Oh, you meant 'snappy' as in my labcoat? Thought you meant the style of my posts... (if there was any). Never mind...

Though, I don't think a labcoat like mine can ever be classed as 'snappy', so I wonder: how do you know how I dress? ... you spying on me?
Teensy little cameras embedded in drosophilae. You track their genes, they track your jeans.
 

SckizoBoy

Ineptly Chaotic
Legacy
Jan 6, 2011
8,678
200
68
A Hermit's Cave
similar.squirrel said:
Teensy little cameras embedded in drosophilae. You track their genes, they track your jeans.
Hoho! I knew it... though I have foiled your plans, for I have the ultimate defence: robber flies! You'll never get anywhere near me *sneer* *sneer*
 

ashiba27

New member
Mar 14, 2011
17
0
0
I've always seen Biology as a science (and I still do) but I will point out that you can read Biology as a BA which as far as I'm aware would suggest that there are enough aspects of Biology that are more humanitarian than scientific to fill a whole degree course.
 

ironduke88

New member
Mar 20, 2010
129
0
0
GeorgW said:
Biology is science, ecology is not, just making that clear. For exaples, once it was said that all ravens are black. Then one day, a white one was seen, so they corrected it. This is not a scientific method, that is guesswork.
I missed this dicussion the first time around, and I want my say. Just so we know where am coming from, I am a behavioural ecologist investigating the meachanisms that determine host-choice decisions in parasitoid Hymenoptera. Ecology is a science, unfortunately the further away you get from Maths the less repeatable your experiments are; there is more variation and the same phenomena are less likely to occur twice. In a physics experiment everyone will observe the same thing, in a chemistry one most of the people will observe the same thing, and in a biology experiment a lower proportion of people will observethe same thing. This has nothing to do the science being soft and purely to do with the number of factors involved in the observation.
However, in ecology, unlike maths for example, what we study is highly observeable. And we can repeat our experiments until we discern which phenomena is the most likely to occur and what factors result in the different variations. Ecology is the culmination of this with most experiments taking years worth of data, as is similar for medicine, sociology or anthropology; while chemistry and physics have much faster turn-overs as they have less factors to consider and the time scale that their observations occur on at much shorter.

OT: One of my colleages, a mathetician working in the evolution department, is in fact using biological knowledge as both an art and a science. He is using mathematics, combined with the stochastic behaviour of bacteria (yes, bacteria behave), to predict and control fractal patterns in colonial expansion. He is then using the fractal patterns, and photos thereof, as part of his art portfolio.
 

SckizoBoy

Ineptly Chaotic
Legacy
Jan 6, 2011
8,678
200
68
A Hermit's Cave
ashiba27 said:
I've always seen Biology as a science (and I still do) but I will point out that you can read Biology as a BA which as far as I'm aware would suggest that there are enough aspects of Biology that are more humanitarian than scientific to fill a whole degree course.
The title of a degree has little bearing on things, I don't think, since at Oxbridge, everything studied at undergraduate level is awarded as a BA (except medicine). And at several institutions (even though no-one will deny it is a science) chemistry degrees are awarded as B/MChem instead of BSc/MSci which is just... odd.