Poll: Is New Vegas a rip off?
- Thread starter darkkan2125
- Start date
Recommended Videos
While that's reasonable for mods, it's no excuse at all for bugs. Releasing a buggy game is unacceptable, Bethesda has yet to learn that.Sleekgiant said:
It's fairly similar, but it actually has a character. FO3 was pretty good but sort of lacked it.
I will be honest I am a little underwhelmed with the new Fallout. It is fun (don't get me wrong) but compared to 3 it lacks a little bit. There are things that I really like that were added such as factions and concocting new and fun things (reminds me of my time playing oblivion 
)
But in terms of quests I am a bit "meh" on the subject. the side quests do not (so far....I will admit I have not yet finished the game so who knows my opinion may change later down the road) give me that accomplishing feeling that I had when I beat the side quests in Fallout 3. The Story line is pretty neat though.
Like I said I have not yet finished the game and who knows maybe it will blow me away.......so anywho just my personal thoughts
High Fives and Booty Bumps
Goochman
)But in terms of quests I am a bit "meh" on the subject. the side quests do not (so far....I will admit I have not yet finished the game so who knows my opinion may change later down the road) give me that accomplishing feeling that I had when I beat the side quests in Fallout 3. The Story line is pretty neat though.
Like I said I have not yet finished the game and who knows maybe it will blow me away.......so anywho just my personal thoughts
High Fives and Booty Bumps
Goochman
That said:
While this is generally true, saying all sequels are like their predecessors is garbage. Most recent example would be Dragon Age 2, but things like Master of Orion 3 and, more obviously, Duke Nukeum: Manhattan Project plays quite a bit differently than their predecessors.Sleekgiant said:
Strange but very true. Vampire: The Masquerade as well. They're all so awesome, yet so buggy. How can we teach them their lesson? Not buying the games is clearly impossible.Sleekgiant said:
Well guess I should have said most.Delusibeta said:
That said:While this is generally true, saying all sequels are like their predecessors is garbage. Most recent example would be Dragon Age 2, but things like Master of Orion 3 and, more obviously, Duke Nukeum: Manhattan Project plays quite a bit differently than their predecessors.Sleekgiant said:
Also nice pics
I say we just wait and not buy it till its fixedCowabungaa said:
Well I started playing it and noticed it hasn't changed much from the old one,the "setting" is changed thats for sure and the gameplay is more improved than the previous Fallout.
Also tends to bring more of a "western" approach,which some people might not enjoy.
That said,it is a decent game to pass up the time
Also tends to bring more of a "western" approach,which some people might not enjoy.
That said,it is a decent game to pass up the time
But they're so awesooooome.... *whispers* I must have them.Sleekgiant said:I say we just wait and not buy it till its fixed
See my dilemma? How can we make them learn!
Strange how with New Vegas, no one agrees with him. But if it was Left 4 Dead 2 he was talking about, I could safely say over half of you would be agreeing. Funny how that works.
