BioRage1920 said:
The Doctor(eight doctor) in the "Eight Doctor Adventure" book series, occasionally kissed and blatantly flirted with his male companion Fitz Kreiner. It was VERY IMPLIED that they were a little more than "just friends", and in one book I recall The doctor admitting to have a crush on Shakespeare.
Also
fun fact)the Ninth Doctor's famous leather jacket was originally Fitz's.
I personally don't think he's gay, I think of him as more asexual.
That's all well and good, but it's not canon.
And see this is why this entire discussion bothers me. As someone earlier put it, "why should him being married with a family mean he isn't gay?"
Ya know what? It doesn't. But it also gives no indication whatsofuckingever that he IS gay. I mean jesus tapdancing christ. Excentric? Definitely. British? Extremely. Enjoys smoking sausage? That's a bit of a stretch.
Point of fact, I think we need a new name for this. Let's call it Dumbledore Syndrome. It's when an author for no reason what so goddamned ever starts bringing up questions of a popular character's sexuality when it's neither relevant to the story nor relevant to the character.
"Oh. By the way, Dumbledore's gay. I mean obviously. An older grandfather figure who likes hanging out with young boys? And gandalf. And frodo, I mean seriously. what was going ON with him and sam. Hello!!! And Kirk was clearly bi for spock and picard and riker were obviously going at it. And don't even get me started on sam and dean in supernatural. I mean just because there is NO INDICATION OF IT WHATSOEVER doesn't mean that without empirical proof of them shagging some bimbet on screen in front of god and everyone that they're not smoking pole the millisecond they do the next jump cut. And even if they do, well that just clearly means they're obviously bi. So yeah, there's your childhood forever ruined for you. Enjoy."
This entire discussion makes my brain hurt.