Poll: Jiggle Physics on Man Parts

ItsNotRudy

New member
Mar 11, 2013
242
0
0
torno said:
I remember Lucifer's wang from Dante's Inferno having some physics to it.
You know, that had to be somebody's job, giving it physics. Somebody had to sit there, and make the devils dick swing to-and-fro properly. And then a QA tester had to make sure it still swung proper during gameplay. And they got payed for it.
I don't know if that's a good or bad thing.
/Credit roll


MALE GENITAL PHYSICS
Bob X
John C
Etc


Man I would be ashamed to be on a credit roll.
 

The_Echo

New member
Mar 18, 2009
3,253
0
0
I don't think men generally... jiggle.

I mean, if his dangledung was half the size of his leg, I could see it moving around and having a grand ol' time. But most of the time that isn't really the case.

Also, can someone give me a link, or something, to explain what this Dragon's Crown deal is all about? As is, I don't see why people would be upset that boobs are subject to gravity and happen to be of a bouncy nature.

EDIT: Alright, I'm all caught up, and I still don't see why it's even a fucking issue. Of the three ladies present in Dragon's Crown, we see three separate body types: petite, voluptuous and hypermuscular. Of course all of these are archetypal designs but they fit into the style of the game and are all very well animated. Conversely, we see three male archetypes present: the slim wizard, ironclad knight and burly I-don't-need-armor dwarf. The game's basically covering its bases with these designs.

Whether these characters need to be designed this way is out of the question. They were designed this way, they are designed this way, the designs fit the aesthetic and if you don't like one, don't use it! (I myself probably wouldn't use the Amazon, for example.) That's how the artist wanted those characters to look.

And for the Kotaku guy to say "oh this is such a childish design because boobs" is childish in and of itself.

You know what I do when I see a well-endowed character for the first time? I notice the tits, and then get over it because the character is more than that.
 

Sherokain

New member
Jan 11, 2013
62
0
0
The_Echo said:
I don't think men generally... jiggle.

I mean, if his dangledung was half the size of his leg, I could see it moving around and having a grand ol' time. But most of the time that isn't really the case.

Also, can someone give me a link, or something, to explain what this Dragon's Crown deal is all about? As is, I don't see why people would be upset that boobs are subject to gravity and happen to be of a bouncy nature.
Jim's video explains it, (http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/jimquisition/7196-Boob-Wars-and-Dragon-Crowns)
as well as the general subject of the jiggling there was also backlash when one side insinuated, the art direction was derived from the brain of a 14 year old. While the other side retorted by seemingly inferring that because their detractors didn't like the large jiggling breasts, they must therefore be gay. This is just my take on the matter, feel free to correct me if i have missed the point.
 

Combustion Kevin

New member
Nov 17, 2011
1,206
0
0
equal treatment and all that jazz, but usually you only get to see man parts when you're actually in an explicitly sexual or erotic situation, pants has a way of hiding things.

unless we count pecks, pectoral physics would be funny.
 

UniversalRonin

New member
Nov 14, 2012
240
0
0
Honestly, fair is fair. If we are going to keep on making female jiggle physics fairly unrealistic, then the other side of the coin is we should do the same to males. In my case, that would include the man-boobs.
 

Teoes

Poof, poof, sparkles!
Jun 1, 2010
5,174
0
0
mbarker said:
That's ridiculous, how would you be able to move and fight properly in a banana hamock with a huge bouncing shlong?
Now, sarcasm and irony can be difficult to communicate in written form so I can't tell if you're being serious with this; but I hope you realise the exact same argument can and should be leveled at the Sorceress' stupendous balcony.


Voted: 'Sure, why not?'. With no small measure of OLOLOLOL. That would be hilarious to see, please please someone make it happen.
 

Goro

New member
Oct 15, 2009
234
0
0
Country
Australia
Abso-freakin-lootly hilarious! I would love to see it! Turn about is fair play.
 

Ferisar

New member
Oct 2, 2010
814
0
0
Yuuki said:
Firstly, there is nothing men have to "jiggle" on the same scale as female breasts that protrudes openly from their body (unless they're completely naked and have an erection, but then you're talking about a porno flick, not a video game). Basic biology.

Secondly, most women are actually turned OFF by nuclear-missile-sized packages because trying to imagine getting pounded by something that size will either rip you in half or leave you critically wounded. Not fun.

Thirdly, and this is me stepping way back and taking a look over the grand picture - the majority of the world is still in a mindset that a man is judged by his deeds while a woman is judged by her beauty. Feminine beauty has been one of the biggest "markets" throughout the history of mankind, as far back as the freaking caveman days...and today that market is bigger than ever - what you see in videogames is just a tiny portion of that market. Don't get me wrong, there is also a rising market for male handsomeness (that's where you'll find your "jiggle physics on man parts" lol)...but that market completely shrivels in comparison to the feminine beauty one, just take a look at most advertisements found in any facet of life.

I've been told that everyone loves to see a beautiful woman and/or her figure - including other women!. Now don't chuck rocks at me because I don't fully believe that, but it's what I've been told and it's what the world seems to be hinting at.
There is simply something "graceful" about the female figure, 'tis a work of art.
You're taking this thread way too seriously.

It's not about being turned on or off, it's about the ludicrous nature of oversized gender-specific bits and how it would be AMUSING to see the same treatment be done to a male, not how it needs to attract the "loves giant ripped men with huge schlongs" crowd.

Anyway...

Yes.
Dante's Inferno has taught me the power of the twisting package.
 

Moonlight Butterfly

Be the Leaf
Mar 16, 2011
6,157
0
0
As long as he grinds it right up in the camera.

It's only fair :p

(But seriously we don't need to start making male characters look ridiculous as well do we?)
 

Moonlight Butterfly

Be the Leaf
Mar 16, 2011
6,157
0
0
Yuuki said:
I'm sure the women with eating disorders would disagree with you on the merits of the high value of female beauty.

It's not a good thing we are judged by what we look like. Unless you think massive tits should be the prime qualification in looking after the safety of nuclear power plants. etc etc.

As for those of you saying 'male bits don't work that way' Tits don't work that way either.
 

kailus13

Soon
Mar 3, 2013
4,568
0
0
Teoes said:
mbarker said:
That's ridiculous, how would you be able to move and fight properly in a banana hamock with a huge bouncing shlong?
Now, sarcasm and irony can be difficult to communicate in written form so I can't tell if you're being serious with this; but I hope you realise the exact same argument can and should be leveled at the Sorceress' stupendous balcony.


Voted: 'Sure, why not?'. With no small measure of OLOLOLOL. That would be hilarious to see, please please someone make it happen.
A dick that big would actually get in the way of a mans legs. Just playing devils advocate.
 

Yuuki

New member
Mar 19, 2013
995
0
0
Ferisar said:
You're taking this thread way too seriously.

It's not about being turned on or off, it's about the ludicrous nature of oversized gender-specific bits and how it would be AMUSING to see the same treatment be done to a male, not how it needs to attract the "loves giant ripped men with huge schlongs" crowd.

Anyway...

Yes.
Dante's Inferno has taught me the power of the twisting package.
Oh sorry, that's me digging too deep into things :S
If the question was truly about it being AMUSING then of course it would! It would be amusing as hell, very much giggle-worthy.
I'm sure Indie developer will have the balls (no pun intended) to just go ahead with such a thing and see what it fetches them :D

Moonlight Butterfly said:
As long as he grinds it right up in the camera.

It's only fair :p

(But seriously we don't need to start making male characters look ridiculous as well do we?)
Of course we do! Where's your imagination?

It's just that the market for such a thing is very small, so it'll ultimately end up being not very popular in mainstream. But it can and should be done if an artist/developer feels like it, I really have no reason to object.

With game development costs being as absurdly high as they are, I eagerly await for someone to take a leap of faith with such an idea! I'm all for variety.

(He can grind it into the camera as much as he likes, yeeeah baby do it :p)
 

Iron Criterion

New member
Feb 4, 2009
1,271
0
0
mad825 said:
Yes, your wife.

I don't think many girls could imagine what it's like to have something dangling in-between their legs. Testes are designed to absorb shock or movement to prevent them A) getting twisted - a catastrophic condition which cuts off the blood supply B) Falling off. Quite frankly, it would be an unsightly thing to see because of the pain that the character may be experiencing.

Breasts are just fat tissue with small glands inside to produce milk when the time comes, fat is known to be "wobbly". Sure, the girl might get a bad back because of the size but who doesn't have a bad back? Bad backs aren't as bad as people say.
Wow. What you've essentially said here is that it'd horrible to see a man suffering from oversized genitalia, but a woman suffering due to MASSIVE breasts should quit her bitching. Thanks man, I needed a laugh. Pathetic.
 

MeChaNiZ3D

New member
Aug 30, 2011
3,104
0
0
It would make me far more uncomfortable than breast physics do, and breast physics are slightly offputting. The other problem is that breasts actually move more than dicks do in standard attire under...non-aroused...conditions. If it was subtle and clearly satire I might cope. I don't know, a female character having massive breasts is almost standard fare while a male character having a massive visible dick makes him some sort of freak.

Why am I even...

...I'm going.

Captcha: "not yet". No fuck you Captcha, I'm going right now and not contemplating this any longer.
 

Teoes

Poof, poof, sparkles!
Jun 1, 2010
5,174
0
0
kailus13 said:
Teoes said:
mbarker said:
That's ridiculous, how would you be able to move and fight properly in a banana hamock with a huge bouncing shlong?
Now, sarcasm and irony can be difficult to communicate in written form so I can't tell if you're being serious with this; but I hope you realise the exact same argument can and should be leveled at the Sorceress' stupendous balcony.


Voted: 'Sure, why not?'. With no small measure of OLOLOLOL. That would be hilarious to see, please please someone make it happen.

A dick that big would actually get in the way of a mans legs. Just playing devils advocate.
Oh I know and I'm not denying it - my point was that jugs of the size the Sorceress is packing would get in the way or restrict a lot of her movement in a similar, if not identical, manner. The wordage used was 'being able to move and fight properly' and we're kidding ourselves if we don't think she'd suffer restrictions. I just found it funny that the argument was only being levelled at the male version.

EDIT: Sorry to go off-topic. Let us resume the discussion and imagining of giant bouncing meat-and-two-veg.
 

generals3

New member
Mar 25, 2009
1,198
0
0
Firstly i find it funny people compare genitalia with breasts. The equivalent would be a men having such pecs that you could make them move under command and it being very visible. But let me guess, that would be a male power fantasy and thus not be "fair"? *rolls eyes*

My answer would be "lolololololol" because that would be my reaction. I can't take games with wobbling tits seriously either. For me all this over the top nonsense is "lolololol"
 

A Weakgeek

New member
Feb 3, 2011
811
0
0
Well, in loadout you can buy a speedo where one of your hairy nuts is hanging out. I believe there might even be some jiggle there.

But then again the game is FTP so youre gonna have to pay like 5 dollars for the pants.
 

Yuuki

New member
Mar 19, 2013
995
0
0
Moonlight Butterfly said:
Yuuki said:
I'm sure the women with eating disorders would disagree with you on the merits of the high value of female beauty.

It's not a good thing we are judged by what we look like. Unless you think massive tits should be the prime qualification in looking after the safety of nuclear power plants. etc etc.
Just because it drives a market doesn't make it mandatory. It doesn't mean people aren't allowed to be fat, or not-so-pretty. It just makes it known as a sign of good health and beauty - something everyone desires to an extent.
Judging from what you said, I don't think you understand the idea of markets. Go to PirateBay right now, disable adblock, search for ANYTHING, and tell me the first advertisements you see on the sides. Alright it's not the most healthy site, but it's proof of what gets a shit-ton of clicks. Or just look up the last 50 years of advertising everything from motorbikes to TOOTHPASTE, right up till today. Women, women, occasionally men, more women. They're everywhere, advertising everything! Why? I'll tell you why, it's very simple - because it's effective.


Moonlight Butterfly said:
As for those of you saying 'male bits don't work that way' Tits don't work that way either.
I tried to find something that didn't involve watermelons or bra/bikini, it's hard on Youtube :S
I think you can agree that that particular woman doesn't exactly have HUGE breasts, yet they do move around quite freely if she even jiggles a little bit.
Hell you only need to step outside in the morning to catch a female jogger wearing a sports bra, as tight/secure as those are even they get a fair amount of jiggle with every step (but don't look too hard or they might get the wrong idea :S).
If you're going to bring up Dead or Alive for the millionth time then please don't, everyone and their cat knows boob physics in that game are hyper-exaggerated.
But tits DO flop around assuming the female isn't flat-chested and sports an "average" size...they're made of skin and soft tissue, not goddamn concrete.

I can find countless more videos if you like, though I'm not finding this particularly fun with my cousin wandering around -_-

Ferisar said:
Aaaand I'm going to go not be in this thread anymore. People can't have fun on this forum. It's not possible.
Amen.
 

kailus13

Soon
Mar 3, 2013
4,568
0
0
Teoes said:
kailus13 said:
Teoes said:
mbarker said:
That's ridiculous, how would you be able to move and fight properly in a banana hamock with a huge bouncing shlong?
Now, sarcasm and irony can be difficult to communicate in written form so I can't tell if you're being serious with this; but I hope you realise the exact same argument can and should be leveled at the Sorceress' stupendous balcony.


Voted: 'Sure, why not?'. With no small measure of OLOLOLOL. That would be hilarious to see, please please someone make it happen.

A dick that big would actually get in the way of a mans legs. Just playing devils advocate.
Oh I know and I'm not denying it - my point was that jugs of the size the Sorceress is packing would get in the way or restrict a lot of her movement in a similar, if not identical, manner. The wordage used was 'being able to move and fight properly' and we're kidding ourselves if we don't think she'd suffer restrictions. I just found it funny that the argument was only being levelled at the male version.

EDIT: Sorry to go off-topic. Let us resume the discussion and imagining of giant bouncing meat-and-two-veg.
Yes, but the sorceress fights with magic so she doesn't need to move her arms that much. A beefcake warrior dude would need to be mobile. A better example for the OP to use would have been a wizard. Again, just playing devils advocate.