Poll: Kinsey scale, where are you?

[RatRace123]

I'd say 1, under the right circumstances I could see myself getting with another guy.
Those right circumstances being the exchange of money, naturally.

I'm of the belief that for the right price anyone would go outside their sexual comfort zone.

 

[Jonluw]

I wouldn't claim to be 100% heterosexual in the sense that I'm immune to homoromantic thougts and such, but I don't exactly find it appropriate to describe myself as "incidentally homosexual".

0.5, I guess.

Is just about where I am. I can be emotionally attracted to men easily and wouldn't give a flat-out "No" to a guy who was interested in me if they were really something special, but it's just much easier for me to be romantically and sexually attracted to women.

If so you're further up on the scale than me.
I would definitely turn down any man who was interested in a romantic or sexual relationship with me.

I forgot to add that I gravitate a little bit towards X as well by the way.

 

[Broady Brio]

I think it's changed constantly my life.

I'd like to think I'm a 0. But maybe 1? Though I tell my friends I'm a X so they will leave me the hell alone about relationships.

 

[Nimcha]

It's odd to see the Kinsey scale is so popular on the internet. It has a fascinating history, Kinsey practically coined the term bisexuality in the professional sense and was perhaps one of the most progressive psychosocioligists ever, but his work is crude and prudish by today's standards. Still a big hero of mine though.

Same here! Some people seem to be under the impression that it's the be all end all of sexuality scales, but it's clearly not. It's just a little more detailed than the usual 'straight-bi-gay' scale. And people forget it's highly personal, some people are more capable than others to move around on the scale a bit while others are just pretty much in the same position for most of their lives.

Incidentally I'm a 6 myself, if anyone cares.

 

[mplantinga]

I picked 6. While there were some moments in my life that seemed otherwise, in retrospect they seemed like embodiments of straight society's expectations rather than anything true to myself.

 

[EeveeElectro]

I'd say either 2 or 3. There's a few ladies I have fancied and I've experimented with both sexes and enjoyed it, but I lean more towards the guys.

Also I don't want to be like a lot of people I know who love the attention they get from being bisexual. :/ I'm putting it down to hormones to be honest.

 

[chaosyoshimage]

Although I think it's kind of funny that you assumed it would be a man to pick, and it ended up being me instead.

Lol, I figured that would happen, I should have went with "someone gayer than me".

 

[Atmos Duality]

I'm a 3.14159265. Only sexually attracted to irrational numbers. So long and hard to calculate.

Cheer up! By degrees of infinity, there are more potential irrational numbers than integers!
You're bound to find a match eventually!

 

[Atmos Duality]

It would take forever to get to really know a single one of them though. We can barely scratch the surface of a number that never ends much less one so unpredictable as an irrational number...

Think of it this way: That represents endless potential for a relationship!
There's so much to explore in each other! You'll never get bored!

 

[Risingblade]

I'm probably a .999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999998

 

[ShindoL Shill]

uhhh... Y? where's pansexual on this scale?
and if you really wanted to be accurate, it would need gynosexual and androsexual.

 

[Phlakes]

1, because Nathan Fillion, David Tennant, etc. exist, but also because being completely exclusive to either is impossible.

 

[WhyBotherToTry]

1 or 2 but I haven't done anything with a guy for a while

 

[Griffolion]

I'm a 0
I don't have anything against homsexuallity but I am only interested about women.

Same.

Also, I love how after your declaration of your heterosexuality, you had to almost justify it by clearing your name of any potential homophobia due to your heterosexuality.

I'm not saying that against you or anything, so don't take it offensively. It was more of a poke at the state of our culture today.

 

[someonehairy-ish]

I'm a one. I joke about a lot of stuff, but the thought of actually doing anything with another guy repulses me. Although I could quite happily spend a while stroking Matt Bellamy's face...

 

[Tiger Sora]

3, I'm right on the fence waiting to be invited over to one side for awhile. Inevitably I'll be back on the fence, again awaiting for someone.

Bi and I like it.

 

[thom_cat_]

uhhh... Y? where's pansexual on this scale?
and if you really wanted to be accurate, it would need gynosexual and androsexual.

If I wanted to be accurate, I wouldn't be using an internet poll with 8 limited options on a gaming forum. Think about it.

 

[Kanatatsu]

Sittin' on the ol' #4 spot over here. I'd prefer to be a bedfellow or be in a relationship with another guy, but I wouldn't shy away from being with a woman at all.

Personally, from what I've seen from my own experiences with other people I'd say that there's truly no such thing as a person who's 0 (completely heterosexual) or 6 (completely homosexual). We all have that one person[footnote]If you consider yourself mainly hetero or homosexual that is. Obviously, if your bi- or pan- there are a hell of a lot more than just one...[/footnote] we'd go gay/straight for, and if you don't you either are lying or just haven't found them yet. Thus, I'd go so far as saying most people who consider themselves heterosexual are actually sitting at 1 on the scale and most people who consider themselves homosexual actually are 5's.

"We all have that one person we'd go gay/straight for, and if you don't you either are lying or just haven't found them yet."

This is not true for many people.

 

[Ersanven]

Thanks to some weird events in the pool at sports camp I'm going to go one.

 

[Cette]

Umm like 87.39 percent straight so....... 1 I guess?

Kinda factor dudes into the same area I would an unattractive woman. Not actively repulsed but not really interested either.