Poll: Let's finish this.

[Da Orky Man]

>Implying there was ever a conflict over which genre was preferred.

I like good shooters.

Doesn't matter what I'm shooting and in which location in the Omniverse I'm shooting them.

We need to settle this dammit! *thumps table*

OT: I'm with Daystar, I just like good shooters. Doesn't matter what they are. Also COD is realistic? LOL

CoD is super realistic.

Doesn't matter how far away someone is, bullets will always hit what you're aiming at with no deviation whatsoever.

Just like real life.

Oh right yeah I forgot. And I forgot that you can heal bullet wounds by hiding behind a table. It's a wonder anyone dies from bullet wounds.

People who die from being shot are just noobs who can't dive behind a wall quick enough.

Real pros jump off of ledges, do a 360 turn and no scope dudes using aim assist.

Just like in real life.

And the magical knife that can instantly kill someone by stabbing their small toe.
Standard issue in any army.

 

[dexxyoto]

What if you just don't like shooters period? I tend to think Mass Effect is more interesting to watch but I gotta admit listening to my ex get the squeakers all riled up in COD was always hilarious.

 

[Sam Warrior]

Neither Modern warfare or battlefield are particularly realistic, cant speak too much for battlefield having not played it but all of the MW's are arcade shooters at best. If you meant set in present day then fair enough but they are by no means realistic shooters. I enjoy both, though lately I've enjoyed SciFi more like Vanquished (awasome game) for example. The best "realistic" shooter I've played is Flashpoint, the original or dragon rising. Where one bullet can kill or injure you to a state which the mission is uncompletable and where firing from the hip without cover will get you killed almost instantly.