What are you talking about?Evil Tim said:Yeah, I hate the parts in an FPS where you move an avatar with a gun around and shoot things, those parts are stupid and should be removed.HUBILUB said:Vehicle sections on the other hand are not necessary to have in an FPS or the like. Just like mandatory shooting sections in Need for Speed would be stupid.
Yeah, probably an extreme example I made there.davidboring said:It's not really like that though is it? The vehicle sections in most FPS/action games are at least partially linked to the story. They may not be "neccessary" but they're what the developers have chosen to put into the game that they have made. It's not like putting guns in Forza or MMA in Viva Pinata or whatever else.HUBILUB said:Vehicle sections on the other hand are not necessary to have in an FPS or the like. Just like mandatory shooting sections in Need for Speed would be stupid.
Well duh, of course the snowmobile went off course when you hit a tree or a big rock, thats what happens in snowmobiles. Plus its not called "Call of Shooty" its Call of Duty, in military duty a lot of the time there is a big involvement of vehicles as transportation so it is just natural that vehicles would be implemented in the game.Iron Mal said:MW2's snowmobiles had terrible handling, you couldn't really aim and pretty much everything knocked you wildly off course, HL2's driving segments were crippled by terrible steering, awkward physics and a repetitive sense of pointlessness (I know Valve try to avoid cut-scenes like the plague but there are some instances where it is simply more fun and conveinient to just 'assume they arrive there' without making the player have to do it themself, you didn't have to drive/run/fly to every area in Halo and it still made sense and was still fun).
I err... I didn't say any of that. Mis-quote.fuzzball said:Well duh, of course the snowmobile went off course when you hit a tree or a big rock, thats what happens in snowmobiles. Plus its not called "Call of Shooty" its Call of Duty, in military duty a lot of the time there is a big involvement of vehicles as transportation so it is just natural that vehicles would be implemented in the game.Woodsey said:MW2's snowmobiles had terrible handling, you couldn't really aim and pretty much everything knocked you wildly off course, HL2's driving segments were crippled by terrible steering, awkward physics and a repetitive sense of pointlessness (I know Valve try to avoid cut-scenes like the plague but there are some instances where it is simply more fun and conveinient to just 'assume they arrive there' without making the player have to do it themself, you didn't have to drive/run/fly to every area in Halo and it still made sense and was still fun).
It's OK. For the purposes of the discussion, assume that Half Life 2 is even remotely as good as Halo. It's hard, but try. It'll make everything better. Start with the fact that not every character reaffirms who you are in Halo and work from there. (Although, just for a bit, that could be funny - imagine every time you entered a room in Halo, a marine turned round and went "MASTER CHIEF!")Woodsey said:3. If you ever try and compare HL2 and Halo again, you will be lynched. And I will be behind it. They're not even in the same league, nor are they out to achieve the same thing.
So, when do you start seeing your psychiatrist?Chipperz said:It's OK. For the purposes of the discussion, assume that Half Life 2 is even remotely as good as Halo. It's hard, but try. It'll make everything better. Start with the fact that not every character reaffirms who you are in Halo and work from there. (Although, just for a bit, that could be funny - imagine every time you entered a room in Halo, a marine turned round and went "MASTER CHIEF!")Woodsey said:3. If you ever try and compare HL2 and Halo again, you will be lynched. And I will be behind it. They're not even in the same league, nor are they out to achieve the same thing.
Evil Tim said:Although, upon reading it, mandatory shooting sections WOULD be pretty cool in Need for Speed. Think about it. You're racing, and you lose, and the other team starts to laugh at you, and you shoot them. And take their cars.HUBILUB said:Vehicle sections on the other hand are not necessary to have in an FPS or the like. Just like mandatory shooting sections in Need for Speed would be stupid.
I dunno, I guess it would save me a lot of frustration.
How long have you been going to these forums? Everyone knows I like taking out frustration on people who even jokingly claim that one game/system is better than another game/system. They're both great games, and they provide enjoyment for millions of people worldwide, so I'd say they're about equal. That said, personally I could get through Halo 1 and 2, which is more than I can say for Half Life 1 and 2...Woodsey said:So, when do you start seeing your psychiatrist?Chipperz said:It's OK. For the purposes of the discussion, assume that Half Life 2 is even remotely as good as Halo. It's hard, but try. It'll make everything better. Start with the fact that not every character reaffirms who you are in Halo and work from there. (Although, just for a bit, that could be funny - imagine every time you entered a room in Halo, a marine turned round and went "MASTER CHIEF!")Woodsey said:3. If you ever try and compare HL2 and Halo again, you will be lynched. And I will be behind it. They're not even in the same league, nor are they out to achieve the same thing.
Manhattan2112 said:That would make the entire game feel more "gangsta"... For maximum realism, you should fire your gun sideways, nearly break your wrist and barely hit the brick wall behind them.Evil Tim said:Although, upon reading it, mandatory shooting sections WOULD be pretty cool in Need for Speed. Think about it. You're racing, and you lose, and the other team starts to laugh at you, and you shoot them. And take their cars.HUBILUB said:Vehicle sections on the other hand are not necessary to have in an FPS or the like. Just like mandatory shooting sections in Need for Speed would be stupid.
I dunno, I guess it would save me a lot of frustration.
"How long have you been going to these forums?"Chipperz said:How long have you been going to these forums? Everyone knows I like taking out frustration on people who even jokingly claim that one game/system is better than another game/system. They're both great games, and they provide enjoyment for millions of people worldwide, so I'd say they're about equal. That said, personally I could get through Halo 1 and 2, which is more than I can say for Half Life 1 and 2...
Sorry but you did seem like a fanboy in your lynch post. Musta been taken that way by the other fellow.Woodsey said:And if you enjoy it so even when a person makes a joking reference (my lynch line clearly was), maybe you should take the dildo out your arse and learn to joke a little?
Lulz, got a pretty dry wit sometimes.Sulu said:Sorry but you did seem like a fanboy in your lynch post. Musta been taken that way by the other fellow.Woodsey said:And if you enjoy it so even when a person makes a joking reference (my lynch line clearly was), maybe you should take the dildo out your arse and learn to joke a little?