Poll: Modern Warfare 3: Would You Buy It If...

[Jabberwock xeno]

If it's half as good as mw2, then yes.

Let me tell you, i'm a halo fanboy, but even I thoughtg mw2 deserved every 10/10 score it got.

Great singleplayer, good story, great multiplayer, large amounts of weapons and customization, it even had a 3rd person mode.

If my country were the enimey, then i'd want to play it even more. It's a POV that simply is nigh impossble to find these days.

 

[Captain Pirate]

Yes, easily. That sounds badass. No language barriers anymore, making me actually 9If only very slightly) connect with the AI I'm about to kill. Before they were so alien that they may as well have BEEN aliens. Talking in a language I don't understand, with AI easily distinguishable against a real human, it wouldn't have made much fo a difference if they had two arms or six.

Plus, I'll likely only be getting MW3 mainly to tie up the Soap/Makarov/Price/Shepherd storyline.

 

[LiftYourSkinnyFists]

An enemy in a video game is just an enemy in a video game... I would double bop goombas if they were NATO or US soldiers same as I'd shoot any video game enemy.

 

[gmaverick019_v1legacy]

I'll buy it. Why would I car who the enemy is? In a few of the MoH games you play as the Axis and the Allies so it doesn't really bother me who I play as as long as the game is good.

this by far.

what is with the massive angsty hate on "america fuck yeah" attitudes as of late? first off i hardly ever see someone say it, and they are 99% of the time trolling or making fun of the stereotype when it is mentioned, and furthermore the call of duty campaigns really don't give that kind of vibe off, hell in mw2 the american general ends up being the bad guy and the british end up being the badass cool guys to save the day in the end of mw1 and mw2

but regardless, any game, anywhere, as long as the game is fun and is slightly interesting, i couldn't care who the enemy/allies are really.

 

[Kevlar Eater]

I wouldn't buy the game no matter what. I've grown weary of the CoD series after World at War, and my god, that was a waste of money. Plus, I've grown sick of the cash cow franchise as a whole.

 

[razelas]

Honestly I wouldn't buy the game if I'm fighting space ninja pirates and the game gives me free blowjobs (alright, maybe then).

Anyway, I see nothing wrong with gunning down some NATO countrymen. Wtf do I care? I like shooting people, I don't really care what color they are or what nationality.

The nationality of the enemies wouldn't really affect my decision in the slightest.

It won't really affect my decision. If someone is evil, I'll kill them. If someone is trying to kill me, I'll kill them. If someone is shown from a suspicious looking camera angle, I'll kill them. In the game of course.

Who gives a fuck if your country are the bad guys.

If I were to buy it the fact that enemies being people from my country wouldn't bother me.

An enemy in a video game is just an enemy in a video game... I would double bop goombas if they were NATO or US soldiers same as I'd shoot any video game enemy.

I'll buy it. Why would I car who the enemy is? In a few of the MoH games you play as the Axis and the Allies so it doesn't really bother me who I play as as long as the game is good.

this by far.

what is with the massive angsty hate on "america fuck yeah" attitudes as of late? first off i hardly ever see someone say it, and they are 99% of the time trolling or making fun of the stereotype when it is mentioned, and furthermore the call of duty campaigns really don't give that kind of vibe off, hell in mw2 the american general ends up being the bad guy and the british end up being the badass cool guys to save the day in the end of mw1 and mw2

but regardless, any game, anywhere, as long as the game is fun and is slightly interesting, i couldn't care who the enemy/allies are really.

Just to clarify, I'm not suggesting using anti-nationalism against the US/NATO countries as a gimmick, but rather as political commentary to critique the US/NATO. I'm sure you've all heard of the wikileaks incident, involving US Army intelligence analyst, PFC (formerly SPC) Bradley Manning. Are you aware of his incarceration? [http://socialistworker.org/2011/03/08/torturing-bradley-manning]

MANNING HIMSELF is now experiencing the savage behavior of the Pentagon.

Manning has been in solitary confinement for more than seven months at a Marine brig in Quantico, Va. During that time, he has been subject to ongoing harsh treatment that, according to many experts, would rise to the level of torture under the Geneva Conventions (which Manning is not subject to, as he is not a prisoner of war).

This includes being confined to a 6-by-12-foot cell for 23 hours each day, constantly watched on video cameras, denied physical exercise and articles of clothing and bedding, denied sleep during the day and repeatedly woken by guards throughout the night.

The military claims Manning's treatment is standard for "prevention of injury" watch and that he is treated the same as any other detainee at Quantico--but these punitive measures are clearly designed to break his spirit.

Just 24 hours after being informed that he now faces a potential death sentence, Manning was reportedly forced to strip in his cell, and then left naked for more than seven hours overnight. When it came time for his "morning inspection" at 5 a.m., Manning was forced to stand, naked, outside of his cell and submit to inspection. He has had to undergo this humiliation every day since.

According to lawyer David Coombs, Marine spokesperson 1st Lt. Brian Villiard said "the decision to strip him naked every night is for Pfc. Manning's own protection. Villiard stated that it would be 'inappropriate' to explain what prompted these actions."

Let's face it: the US/NATO do shady, morally ambiguous things that could be arguably war crimes. And if this is what the Pentagon is doing to save face over a few leaked diplomatic cables, how far would they go to cover up corruption (i.e. Gen. Shepard) in the military leadership? I would be fairly interesting if MW3 would be able to criticize the US military and nationalism.

 

[gabe12301]

I'll buy it when George Washington slays a dragon on the back of a flying pig with the help of King Leonidas.

 

[JoshGod]

Depends on if the game is good, which is very unlikely, so i'll leave it as no.

 

[King Toasty]

I have a particular fondness for FPS games, but even so. Unless the game is colorful, massive, immersive, slightly openworld, customization-packed and legitimately FUCKING AWESOME, it wouldn't be worth the $300,000,000 Activision will make.

Captcha: 1997 Orodati. Ninja Master Orodati will be killed in 1997, as you command, Lord Inglip.

 

[2xDouble]

No. Because the game's content has nothing to do with why I don't own it.

I might rent or borrow it to see how the new perspective plays.

 

[zaiggs]

It would still be shit and still end in a "Fuck Yeah, America!" scenario.
So no.

Seriously. You'd think Activision could have made a better ending. It was decent till that last little bit. One of the characters at the end of Black Ops should have just said "Fuck yeah... America". It didn't need that and the game was more about the characters than the country.

I think if the story is written well and can justify it, the enemy won't really matter. Anyways, in the end, the game's mostly about shooting dudes.

 

[jawakiller]

Sure why not? Just because I'm from the U.S. doesn't mean I'm over sensitive or something. It'd be like fighting the Empire of Star Wars but I like a challenge.

 

[Zaik]

No, but I wouldn't buy it if it wasn't.

It would have to be an actual good game with more than a 3 hour campaign and latency check multiplayer for me to buy it.

 

[Jesse Billingsley]

I'll buy it if it is like COD4, and has more sneaky missions, and you know what, while I'm making useless demands, lets have the main character be a chick, that'll change things up

 

[Sniper Team 4]

I'm buying it. I must know what happens in the story. I have a great idea for the first level too:

You play as either Toad or Archer. For the first few minutes, you provide sniper support--like in the mission--then you see the betrayal and the rest of the mission is spent with you two trying to escape from Sheperd's forces. I haven't decided how they'd survive, but I think they should and somehow link up with Price and Soap eventually.

P.S. Pretty sure half of the game will be spent killing Russians, as the United States isn't going to left an invasion and destruction of their country go unanswered.

 

[HapexIndustries]

Let's face it: the US/NATO do shady, morally ambiguous things that could be arguably war crimes. And if this is what the Pentagon is doing to save face over a few leaked diplomatic cables, how far would they go to cover up corruption (i.e. Gen. Shepard) in the military leadership? I would be fairly interesting if MW3 would be able to criticize the US military and nationalism.

Maybe I'm jaded but I assume EVERY political group in power to be involved in some shady shit. LIFE is morally ambiguous.

I don't really care if MW3 criticizes NATO and the US, and I would be surprised as hell if it did. I don't need my video games to spoon feed me political idealism, from one end or the other. Yeah, the whole AMERICA FUCK YEAH thing that some games have (though, I would say, not really CoD:MW games) is tiresome and stupid, but I'm playing a stupid fucking ACTION SHOOTER. If I wanted political machinations and ethical subtlety I would play... well, nothing, really, most games don't have that much depth. I guess I'd read a book or watch a film.



To summarize, I am totally ambivalent to this topic. Except that I would really enjoy a game where I shoot fat southerners. MW5: The New American Civil War! Fat southerners vs fat northerners! AMERICA FUCK YEAH!!!

 

[thelonewolf266]

I take it you mean IW(infinity ward) not IF?

 

[Fajita]

Cod 4 - One of the top 5 shooters I have ever played
MW2 - Fun at first, but eventually things like Danger Close OMA noob tubes made me stop playing. Good entertainment while it lasted, but it didn't last as long as Cod 4
Black Ops - Held my interest for about three weeks, haven't played it since.

Not a good trend. It seems like every CoD game after CoD 4 has just been banking off of Cod 4's success, not really innovating in any major way.

 

[razelas]

Let's face it: the US/NATO do shady, morally ambiguous things that could be arguably war crimes. And if this is what the Pentagon is doing to save face over a few leaked diplomatic cables, how far would they go to cover up corruption (i.e. Gen. Shepard) in the military leadership? I would be fairly interesting if MW3 would be able to criticize the US military and nationalism.

Maybe I'm jaded but I assume EVERY political group in power to be involved in some shady shit. LIFE is morally ambiguous.

I don't really care if MW3 criticizes NATO and the US, and I would be surprised as hell if it did. I don't need my video games to spoon feed me political idealism, from one end or the other. Yeah, the whole AMERICA FUCK YEAH thing that some games have (though, I would say, not really CoD:MW games) is tiresome and stupid, but I'm playing a stupid fucking ACTION SHOOTER. If I wanted political machinations and ethical subtlety I would play... well, nothing, really, most games don't have that much depth. I guess I'd read a book or watch a film.

I don't understand why your hesitant at the thought of games being more than mindless fun?

Bioshock on the subject of extreme anarcho-libertarian/unrestrained capitalism, Mirror's Edge on censorship and social eugenics...

 

[Twad]

They could be alien pirate ninjas and i woudnt buy it. Im just not interested in it.